Channel
@muhammedkaya1221
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
640subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 29 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001514174516 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @muhammedkaya1221 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 29 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/muhammedkaya1221 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 09:16 | 640 | -3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:59 | 643 | no change |
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:01 | 643 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (8 August 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,003 |
| Reactions total | 44 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 04:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
91 reactions across 12 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 69 | 75.8% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 12.1% | |
| 💯 | 9 | 9.89% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 2.20% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 91 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
الإضافة البيانية عند البيانيين مجاز بالاستعارة لا حقيقة؛ لأن الإضافة التي وضعت لتخصيص الأول بالثاني أو تعريفه به استعملت في تبيين الثاني للأول، فصار استعارة مصرحة تبعية. هذا مما نص عليه الدسوقي في حاشيته على مختصر المعاني فقال: "المبحث الثالث: إضافة" اسم" إلى" الله" حقيقية إن أريد من لفظ الجلالة الذات، وعليه يأتى ما مر من بناء المجاز على المجاز، وأما إن أريد منه اللفظ فهى بيانية، والإضافة البيانية مجاز بالاستعارة عند…
والإضافة البيانية للبيانيين هي التي تطلق عليها الإضافة للبيان، فرق!
الإضافة البيانية الإضافة البيانية للبيانيين هي ما قصد بالمضاف إليه بيان المضاف ولا يراد بالمضاف غير المضاف إليه مع اشتراط عمومية الأول مطلقاً وخصوصية الثاني كذلك، بخلاف ما هو للنحويين؛ فإنه اشترط أن يكون بين الأول والثاني عموم وجهي؛ لما هو معلوم في محله مع اشتراط بيان الأول بالثاني مع قطع النظر عن ألا يراد بالأول غير الثاني، والإضافة اللغوية أعم مطلقا منهما. [العلامة الپنجويني: حاشية شرح عبد الله اليزدي على تهذيب الم…
Îro rojek xweş roj e ev cara ewil e di dîroka bakurê Kurdistanê da bi zimanê Kurmancî pirtûkek mentiqê hatiye nivîsandinê! Îcar çi pirtûk e Bûrhana Gelenbewî ya navdar a Seydayê Bedîûzzeman û Seydayê Qeredaxî û Seyda Mela Ebdurrehmanê Pêncwînî her yekî dewra xwe da haşiye û te’lîqatên giranbuha li serê nivîsandine. Ji vir û pêda demek nêzîng da (ez bawer im) bi Kurdî/Kurmancîkî rewan ewê li ber destê we mentiqhezan b…
❤11
Seyda Mele Abdusselam Şadi, Gelenbevinin Burhan'ını Kürtçeye çevirerek büyük bir hizmette bulundu. Allah hizmetlerini daim etsin 🤲 Not: Bu metin üzerinde Üstad Bediüzzaman (Ta'likat), Pencvini, Karadaği, Molla Bakır gibi büyük Kürt muhakkik âlimlerin haşiyeleri de vardır. Metnin ulaştığı tahkikleri siz düşünün 🌹
❤4
14 yaşında bir feqi'nin Tasrif Molla Ali kitabı...
💯9
Photo, posted without a caption
❤9👏2
https://youtu.be/jMdSVw3x_XE?si=PwfgCIZxl3XMqlJ2
❤5
https://youtu.be/xaTBxebLFUY?si=zWDYO_WyE3yiePEN
❤4
https://youtu.be/uIZMG4Lfa-w?si=vjFyHqPsRZnfXODK
https://youtu.be/e15uRlXUS6c?si=ZLWH1R3PARoJvInf
قالوا إن المجربات يحكم فيها العقل بواسطة تكرار الحس، ولا بد فيه من قياس خفي. قال الفاضل السيالكوتي: (من قياس خفي) أي قياس مرتَّب لا يشعر به صاحب الحكم مع حصوله، وذلك القياس حاصل من تكرر المشاهدة. وبهذا يمتاز عن الأحكام الاستقرائية؛ إذ لا قياس فيها.
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @muhammedkaya1221. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Muhammed Kaya” (@muhammedkaya1221), 640 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/muhammedkaya1221.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.