Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Muhammad Annas

Channel

Muhammad Annas

@muhammadannas0

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

418subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 30 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001911353164
TypeChannel
Username@muhammadannas0
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded30 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/muhammadannas0

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

411420415.530 August 2026 — 420 subscribers30 August 2026 — 420 subscribers9 September 2026 — 411 subscribers19 September 2026 — 418 subscribers41830 August 202619 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 20 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 410–421 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 02:39418+7
9 Sept 2026, 19:38411-9
30 Aug 2026, 03:15420no change
30 Aug 2026, 03:02420first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 31 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
41.1%
avg views ÷ 418 subscribers
Avg views / post
172
1 post measured
Reaction rate
4.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026
Posts held19 (31 January 202624 August 2026)
Views total172
Reactions total7
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Aug 2026, 03:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
28s
Average length
28s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

306 reactions across 19 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10735.0%
🔥4916.0%
custom 5330439226225871946309.80%
👍237.52%
❤‍🔥175.56%
custom 5375135722514685501165.23%
82.61%
custom 536156801102094227661.96%
💯61.96%
🤣61.96%
🗿51.63%
custom 532381112102552494541.31%
👌41.31%
🏆30.98%
👎20.654%
👏20.654%
😁20.654%
😍20.654%
🙏20.654%
🤝20.654%
8 further kinds103.27%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 306 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 31 January 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
14
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 19 we hold a reading for · 21%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @muhammadannas0. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 January 2026 to 24 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

24 Aug 2026, 04:55 UTC172 views7 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Forwarded from @jakhongir_ielts_9

All shall pass - the good, the bad, and the ugly

4💯2👍1

29 Jul 2026, 11:11 UTC504 views4 reactionsread 30 August 2026

Slots updated for current weekend, folks.

custom 53304392262258719464

14 Jul 2026, 14:59 UTC734 views11 reactionsread 30 August 2026

Most people study by reading the same notes again and again. The problem is that repeated reading makes the information feel familiar, but that does not always mean you actually know it. A better method is active recall. After studying a topic, close the book and try to remember what you just learned without looking. You can do this by: ✔️answering questions from memory ✔️explaining the topic out loud ✔️writing dow

5👍2🤝1custom 53304392262258719461custom 53615680110209422761custom 53751357225146855011

7 Jul 2026, 22:58 UTC≈11,600 views12 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

‼️‼️‼️ ANNOUNCEMENT ‼️‼️‼️ MAGNUS IELTS SPEAKING MOCKS ARE NOW OPEN Your real IELTS Speaking test should not be the first time you discover your true level. Magnus Academy’s IELTS Speaking Mock is a fully personalised diagnostic session for students who want more than generic advice or another vocabulary list. Your live mock is conducted one-to-one and includes: ✔️ A full IELTS Speaking mock test ✔️ A complete rec

🔥4custom 537513572251468550131👍1👏1🗿1🤯1

3 Jul 2026, 16:40 UTC870 views11 reactionsread 30 August 2026

Happy summer folks! 🌞 While many are enjoying the break, it’s also the perfect time to reflect on your goals and make smarter improvements. So, I decided to post a little bit about the IELTS Speaking exam. 🎙 Most IELTS candidates do not need another vocabulary list. 📝 They need an honest answer to one question: Why does my Speaking score remain at Band 5.5 or 6.0 despite months of preparation? The answer is rarely

5👍2🔥1custom 53238111210255249451custom 53304392262258719461custom 53615680110209422761

22 Apr 2026, 04:47 UTC≈1,190 views23 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Need to get this printed on a shirt 😂😂

86👍2👎2👌1🔥1🤝1😁1

14 Apr 2026, 13:35 UTC≈1,330 views29 reactions7 Starsread 30 August 2026
Photo

It is funny how the smallest messages from LLMs can stay with us. They are simple. Sometimes amusing. Sometimes oddly motivating. And sometimes, they are exactly the little nudge you needed at the right moment. Maybe it is just interface text. Or maybe words do not have to be deep to make us feel seen. Strange, isn’t it, how even a short line on a screen can make you pause, smile, and continue.

11🤣6custom 53304392262258719463😍2custom 53751357225146855012👌1🗿1🤪1

10 Apr 2026, 04:33 UTC968 views9 reactions5 Starsread 30 August 2026
Video

There are days that remind me why I chose to teach. Last Sunday at the IVOK Olympiad wasn’t just about exams or results. It was a day of effort, nerves, laughter, shashlik, strawberries, and even rainbows - moments that felt just as important as the competition itself. 😳 To my students: you showed up, you tried, and you believed. That already sets you apart. I sincerely wish each of you the very best as you wait fo

🔥62❤‍🔥1

5 Apr 2026, 13:42 UTC≈1,080 views19 reactions1 Starread 30 August 2026

What is home? Where is home? Who is home? There comes a point in life when these questions stop being simple. You begin to wonder whether home is a place, a person, a feeling, or perhaps a version of yourself that feels whole. Is home where your values are understood? Is home where your heart feels quiet? Is home the place you return to, or the person you cannot forget? And what does it mean to “settle”? Is sett

7🔥7👌1🗿1😢1🙏1custom 53238111210255249451

20 Mar 2026, 10:15 UTC≈1,040 views41 reactions1 Starread 30 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

26🔥6custom 53304392262258719463👍2💯2🏆1🤪1

19 Feb 2026, 07:46 UTC≈1,330 views31 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

As Ramadan begins, may this month bring calm to busy hearts, clarity to restless minds, and barakah to every effort we make. May it be a time to slow down, reflect, reset intentions, and reconnect; with faith, with purpose, and with the people who matter most. Wishing everyone a peaceful and blessed Ramadan. 🌙 Ramadan Mubarak 🌙

17❤‍🔥5🔥32🗿1🙏1custom 53304392262258719461custom 53751357225146855011

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @muhammadannas0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Feb 2026, 07:03 UTCFinal Results68 voters

What do you think hurts your exam performances most right now?

  1. ⏱️ Running out of time29%
  2. 🤯 Overthinking simple questions24%
  3. 📉 Inconsistent scores16%
  4. 😐 Losing focus midway31%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 31 January 2026 to 24 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

IELTS Cambridge Practice
@cambridgepractice · 40,488
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 30 August 2026
Multilevel Mock C1 Achiever
@multilevel_mock_C1_achiever · 27,553
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Muhammad Annas” (@muhammadannas0), 418 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/muhammadannas0.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.