Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Muhammadamin's blog

Channel

Muhammadamin's blog

@muhammadaminsblog

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

129subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001312173180
TypeChannel
Username@muhammadaminsblog
Created20 January 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/muhammadaminsblog

Growth

128129128.57 August 2026 — 128 subscribers9 August 2026 — 128 subscribers16 August 2026 — 129 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 128–129 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 16:19129+1
9 Aug 2026, 01:45128no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:31128first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
76.7%
avg views ÷ 129 subscribers
Avg views / post
99.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held20 (26 February 20261 August 2026)
Views total99
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 01:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 09:26 UTC99 viewsread 9 August 2026

Xitoy va O'zbekiston Xitoydagi do'stim bilan O'zbekiston-Xitoy o'rtasidagi farqlar borasida ko'p gaplashib qolamiz. Yo'llar, binolar, infrotuzilma, xavfsizlik borasida Xitoyning qanchalar ilgarilab ketgani asnosida inson kapitali turganiga guvoh bo'lamiz. Barcha yo'llar oxiri borib ta'lim sifatiga borib taqalyapti. Qanchalik kadrlar kuchli bo'lsa, shunchalik YaIM baland bo'lishiga, qo'shimcha qiymat zanjiri yaratil

16 Jul 2026, 10:54 UTC159 viewsread 9 August 2026

Chala sotsiolog sifatida instagramdagi "millat tafakkur tarzi"ni tushunib boryapman. Instagramdan olgan xulosalarimga ko'ra, ushbu postni yozdim. ERKAK haqida "Erkak kishi oʻz holicha hech kim yoki hech narsa." Erkakni faqat unga bogʻlangan foydali xususiyatlari bilangina yaxshi koʻrishadi va qadrlashadi. Materialistik qarashda hozircha buni normal hisoblashyapti. Lekin dunyo faqat materiyadan iborat bo'lmagan ola

13 Jul 2026, 05:28 UTC179 viewsread 9 August 2026

Telefon Kecha yaqin qardonimiznikiga mehmonga bordik. Ancha dildan suhbatlashdik. E'tiborimni tortgan jihat kichkina bolakay bo'ldi. Xonadon kichik farzandi atiga 1-1.5 yosh atrofidagi bola dasturxon yoniga kelgandayoq boshqacha tuyuldi. Bilmadim nimasidur boshqacha turibdida haligi bola. Keyin so'radim, telefon o'ynamaydimi bu bola desam, mutlaqo ushlamaydiyam degan javob berishdi. Umumiy manzara oydinlashdi, dema

21 Jun 2026, 14:29 UTC291 viewsread 9 August 2026

Марғилон шеваси ажойиб. Баъзида табиат ҳодисалари ҳам "сиз"ланади: Янги ой чиқибдилар. Пешин ҳам бўпқоптилар-а? Шабадаям бўптурдилар-а? (бугун жумада эшитдим) Ёмғир ёғсалар яхши бўларди-та! Шом кирдиларми? Азон чақирдиларми? Рамазон қачонгеканлар? Davronbek Tojialiyev

15 Jun 2026, 08:01 UTC302 viewsread 9 August 2026

Bugun to'yimga 4 yil bo'libdi. O'tgan vaqtga qarab turib ba'zi xulosalarni bo'lishmoqchiman. • Marry me qilmasa ham turmush qursa bo'larkan. • Love story qilmasa ham muhabbat bilan yashasa bo'larkan. • Har hafta yoki oyning ma'lum sanasida restoranga chiqmasa ham to'liq baxtni xis qilish mumkin ekan. • Tug'ilgan kun uchun gul olmasa ham ayol kishi baxtli bo'lishi mumkin ekan. • Yil davomida sayohatga chiqmasa ham ba

15 Jun 2026, 06:31 UTC240 viewsread 9 August 2026

Ajoyib insonlar Ba'zi do'stlarimiz bor, har safar qaraganingda Allohning bandalarga yuborgan namunalarini — payg'ambarlarini shu insonlarga o'xshash insonlardan tanlagan bo'lsa kerak deb o'ylab qolaman. Hazrat Navoiy Farhod misolida bunga juda chiroyli ta'rif berganlar: Demonkim ko‘ngli pok-u, ham ko‘zi pok, Tili pok-u, so‘zi pok-u, o‘zi pok. Atrofdagilarga faqat yaxshiliging tegishi, yomonlik ko'rsang Do'stingga

28 May 2026, 11:56 UTC266 viewsread 9 August 2026

Shaxsiyat Shaxsiy kuzatuvlarimga ko'ra yaqin oylarda qarashlarim yana o'zgardi. Bir yilcha avval suhbatlashgan do'stlarim hayron qolishdi. Avvallari liberal qarashlar tarafdori edim, har bir vaziyatda oltin o'rtaliqni topishga, qarshi tarafni ham tushinishga harakat qilardim, ya'ni neytral bo'lardim, o'zimcha. So'nggi yillardagi demakratiyaning inqirozi traditsion qarashlargina insoniyatning haqiqiy o'zligini saql

28 May 2026, 11:36 UTC189 viewsread 9 August 2026

Eng optimistik joyda eng pessimistni ko'rdim. Bittasi masjid oldida qullardan narsa so'rayotgan ekan.

24 May 2026, 04:24 UTC241 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @zambarakning_oqi

Сунъий идрок фойдали иш коэффициентимизни оширишга ёрдам беряпти: матн таржимасими, программа тузишми ёки мураккаб математик ҳисоб-китобларни амалга оширишми. Яъни, битта одам СИ ёрдамида икки ёки уч кишининг ишини бажариши мумкин бўляпти. Гугл, Амазон, Фейсбук ва ҳ.к. гигантлар код ёзиш тезлиги кескин ортганини айтишяпти. Аммо одамлар камроқ ишлаб, кўпроқ пул топишлари масаласи кун тартибида йўқ. Гигантлар ўн минг

23 May 2026, 06:07 UTC178 viewsread 9 August 2026

Bir do'stimiz qoramolchilik bilan shug'ullanadilar va Instagramda kontent yuritadilar sohalari bo'yicha. Bugun reklama video qo'ygan ekanlar qurbonlikka qo'y olgani kelgandik dedilar. Chorvani ichida yurib turib "mani uncha aqlim yetmaydi" deyishlikni o'zi insonni tor sohada bilimi ko'p ekanini bildiradi shaxsan men uchun. Ba'zilar bo'ladi har sohada ekspert, har sohani past-balandini bilaman deydi. Lekin qaniydi sh

14 May 2026, 06:12 UTC257 viewsread 9 August 2026

Dunyoviy ishlarimizda husni xulqli bo'lishimiz, diniy bilimlarimizning bizga qanchalar foyda berayotganining mislicha bo'lar ekan deb o'ylab qoldim. Qancha ko'p hadis va oyatni bilganingiz bilan bandalar orasida Sarvarimiz alayhissalomdek o'zingizni tutmas ekansiz, o'zingizga taqvodorman degan nisbatni mutlaqo bermasligingiz kerak ekan. Ya'ni odam hammaga aytmasa ham o'zini boshqalarga solishtiradi, ayniqsa o'zidan

12 May 2026, 11:56 UTC223 viewsread 9 August 2026

Keldi-ketdi fikrlar O'ta oddiy narsalar bir vaqtning o'zida shunchalar murakkab ekanini o'ylab ko'rganmisiz? Inson necha ming yillardan beri yashaydi, lekin faqat bitta chizib ko'rsatilgan "baxtli bo'lish" yo'li aniqlanmagan. Har kim o'zicha baxtli ekanini o'zi belgilaydi. Kimdur chaylada baxtli, kimdur koshonada baxtsiz. Garmonlar hammada bir xil, jinsga ko'ra. Me'yorlari ham aniq, lekin shu me'yorga yetganda ba

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @muhammadaminsblog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 627,171 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Muhammadamin's blog” (@muhammadaminsblog), 129 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/muhammadaminsblog.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.