Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

泥中语

@muddy_cat

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

843subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001177823847
TypeChannel
Username@muddy_cat
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/muddy_cat

Growth

8438458446 Aug 2026, 20:46 — 845 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 13:13 — 843 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 20:467 Aug 2026, 13:13
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 843–845 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 13:13843-2
6 Aug 2026, 20:46845first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

117 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍9984.6%
97.69%
🙏54.27%
😱21.71%
🤔21.71%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 117reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 May 2025 to 6 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Dec 2025, 01:29 UTC≈1,180 viewsread 6 August 2026

看到很多人在听书,不知道都是用的什么app呀?

26 Nov 2025, 14:26 UTC≈1,430 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

之前在美国机场安检的经历总是非常糟糕,会被反复推回去重新扫描,安检人员也很凶会刁难我,会说什么“手举高”(看我身材)、“声音大点回答我的问题”(听我声音),女安检员推我回去的时候还会有意往我胸上推(摸我胸) 安检常常会有意造成“是你的错给我们添麻烦要重新扫描”的假象,比如让我感觉是我自己没按要求把手举高或者是我踏出来太早了,然后再带着“可知道你到底是男是女了”的得意在安检机上选择对应按钮... 我最近氪金去走机场快速通道了,省去了很多麻烦,但心里很多愤怒和不甘心,我们一定要付这个人妖税/跨子税,才能免去这些本来就不应该出现的羞辱吗?

🙏43

11 Nov 2025, 00:50 UTC≈1,450 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

朋友问我: 为什么相处长了周围人都开始假设我是性少数?明明我什么都没说? 我的回答: 我有个想法,不一定对。我的观察是,我们社会要求我们从自己的性别性向出发,去定义我们的社会关系和我们行为的意义。比如,顺直男通常不会叫关系很好的朋友“闺蜜”,顺直女通常不会叫关系很好的朋友为“女性朋友”。这些做法对顺直人来说常常下意识的,“顺理成章”的。那么,在极度性别化的语言和思考体系里,一个不是极度深柜的性少数其说话和行为的模式必然是有所不同,甚至在某些时候是突兀的,对性少数知识有所了解的周围人慢慢能猜到也很正常吧... 简而言之,有时候别人能猜到,不是因为我们做了什么,而是我们没做什么...

👍42

12 Oct 2025, 11:29 UTC≈1,320 viewsread 6 August 2026

最近看到的一条英文消息,是说加沙的民众因为 Global Sumud Flotilla 以色列的封锁减弱,几个月来第一次成功出海捕鱼。

12 Oct 2025, 11:20 UTC≈1,230 viewsread 6 August 2026

(我连 Global Sumud Flotilla 该怎么翻译比较好都不知道)

12 Oct 2025, 11:20 UTC≈1,170 viewsread 6 August 2026

关于 Global Sumud Flotilla ,有比较好的中文 介绍 + 更新 吗?

6 Sept 2025, 11:01 UTC≈1,480 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

不是“女装”一定是大佬,而是能力不够强的性少数太容易被赶出了职场,消失在公共视野之外了。

👍8

28 Aug 2025, 16:52 UTC≈1,470 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

<= 在大多数人共情心的边界之外,小心翼翼的生存

2

25 Aug 2025, 18:38 UTC≈1,370 views0 reactionsread 6 August 2026

求 mac 上放心安全的 VPN 客户端推荐~

13 Aug 2025, 03:08 UTC≈1,460 viewsread 6 August 2026

我有一位朋友好像陷入了MAGA宣传和QAnon阴谋论😭 请问有什么事实确凿、简明易懂的时政信息来源可以给她推荐吗?

1 Aug 2025, 20:04 UTC≈1,550 viewsread 6 August 2026

旧mac电脑被我用来当服务器,常常有wifi断连后不再自动连接的情况(大概一周一次),请问有什么办法解决吗?

10 Jul 2025, 19:29 UTC≈1,800 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026

从未和孩子平等沟通的家长,觉得操控不了孩子了就给孩子写长信长文 —— 写出来的不外乎是罔顾孩子真实经历真实感受,通篇“我是为你好你需听我话”的傲慢意淫

👍16

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @muddy_cat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 987,299 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“泥中语” (@muddy_cat), 843 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/muddy_cat.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.