Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

[💊МуДАсБр0Д💊]

@mudasbrod

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

633subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001738809558
TypeChannel
Username@mudasbrod
Created23 February 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mudasbrod

Growth

6337 Aug 2026, 00:33 — 633 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 07:17 — 633 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 00:337 Aug 2026, 07:17
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 632–634 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 07:17633no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:33633first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 11 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
51.6%
avg views ÷ 633 subscribers
Avg views / post
326
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
34.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held10 (11 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total2,285
Reactions total794
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 00:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

927 reactions across 9 posts, in 35 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 535298784318458084913814.9%
💘869.28%
custom 5215725958329282459747.98%
👾646.90%
custom 5337285769167917607636.80%
custom 5404676868353826798616.58%
custom 5305574019871816195444.75%
custom 5368627927938251912424.53%
custom 5294264554937664218404.31%
custom 5273762077578635297363.88%
🕊343.67%
custom 5287411651149054673323.45%
custom 5368378751115607139313.34%
custom 5312466317100461471293.13%
custom 5361847574737205350283.02%
custom 5337064445208181192272.91%
custom 5255792776225760463242.59%
custom 5801198707365908179161.73%
custom 5323742448793433984111.19%
custom 534833611872509183970.755%
15 further kinds404.31%

Custom emoji. 17 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 927reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 10 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mudasbrod. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC102 views23 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
File

🌈🌈

custom 535298784318458084917custom 53618475747372053504custom 53483361187250918392

4 Aug 2026, 13:53 UTC110 views81 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 взрыв на заводе скитлза в бразильских трущобах👺 неприлично долго мучил этот артик...у заказчика запаса терпения на всю вселенную хватит, святой человек 🙏 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩 #комыш

💘37custom 535298784318458084920custom 536184757473720535018custom 53483361187250918395custom 53055740198718161951

30 Jul 2026, 14:39 UTC232 views97 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 для моего хорошего братишки 2.0 (на этот раз с покрасиком хехе) [🌈 @BenRozenTGK 🌈] 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 #комыш

💘49custom 525579277622576046324custom 580119870736590817916custom 53482672317446303634custom 53300274333514682652🍓1custom 54745492216862583061

28 Jul 2026, 17:34 UTC406 views143 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

😘❤️😘😘😘😘😘❤️ ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ мояшкины в виде птичек 🍋Джушико - попугай корелла 🕳Маммон - птица бородач Джушико такая типа болтушка-чирикалка красопетка, а Маммончик типа грозный ястреб падальщик уууу ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ #джушико #маммон

custom 535298784318458084966custom 527376207757863529736custom 536837875111560713928custom 53237424487934339848custom 53638453916598466634🏆1

25 Jul 2026, 15:15 UTC373 views165 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🥇🥇🥇🥇🥇🥇🥇 от Джуши Маммона для аска в ВК ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ цыганский джокир 🤡 ➿➿➿➿➿➿ 💲 #маммон 💲

custom 521572595832928245974custom 536862792793825191242custom 529426455493766421840🏆4custom 53683787511156071393custom 53436005049643978502

19 Jul 2026, 14:51 UTC443 views128 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 от Джушико для аска из ВК ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ ДЖУШИКО БЕЗ КОСМЕТИКИ!!1! вспоминаю как рисовать мою бэйбу спустя полгода нихуя не деланья (дэээм меня чуть не выпнули из аска... УЧЁБА САСИ БИБУ ТЫ ПОРТИШЬ МНЕ ИНТЕРНЕТ-ЖИЗНЬ) ➿➿➿➿➿➿ 🌺 #джушико 🌸

custom 533728576916791760763custom 528741165114905467332custom 531246631710046147129custom 53326303381516706912💅1custom 53237424487934339841

16 Jul 2026, 14:31 UTC619 views157 reactions3 Starsread 7 August 2026
Video

💫💫💫💫💫💫 НА ЛАДОШКЕ 🍌 ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ ✔️✔️✔️✔️✔️✔️ 💊 #БРОД 💊

👾64custom 530557401987181619543custom 535298784318458084935custom 53618475747372053506custom 53460513722172988934🌭3custom 53237424487934339842

11 Jul 2026, 15:53 UTC598 views129 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

КОМИКСНАЯ ЗАРИСОВОЧКА ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ с Ричем и доктором Жгутовым [📢 доктор-пейшент ау 📢] ни один уборщик не пострадал! только Ричика опять наругали😢 хотел просто пару скетчей сделать, но оно само вылилось в некий мини-комикс хех (просто я очень люблю своих осиков) ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ #рич 🩸 #жгут 🦗

custom 540467686835382679861🕊30custom 533706444520818119227custom 60506954664194921674custom 54180210139149277853🆒2custom 52219537553977664972

11 Jul 2026, 12:01 UTC373 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🧞‍♂️Чатик пиара, господа-кофеманы 🧞‍♂️ ~Все по стандарту, нужно пиарить свои чэнелы, искать мью и все в этом роде. ~ тык https://t.me/coffee_piaar https://t.me/coffee_piaar тук ждем именно тебя, баранчик)

🕊4

11 Jul 2026, 12:01 UTC307 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺 🌺🌺🌺 👅вы можете сюда репостить ваши работы, искать аудиторию и мью! 📷дружелюбное комьюнити где можно не только попиарится но и возможность найти близких людей) 📚простые и несложные правила) с вас лишь репост В самопиаре продавать адопты разрешено. @jissusyyy https://t.me/+ryvr6XCC6udmNWQy Автор рисунка: @cmorfiya

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @mudasbrod. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 269,403 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“[💊МуДАсБр0Д💊]” (@mudasbrod), 633 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mudasbrod.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.