Channel
@mucho_kaka
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
287subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002942048721 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mucho_kaka |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mucho_kaka |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 12:37 | 287 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:18 | 289 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:29 | 289 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 10 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (10 June 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 886 |
| Reactions total | 82 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 08:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
287 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5467573516192733491 | 88 | 30.7% | |
| 💩 | 53 | 18.5% | |
| custom 5206444207585120498 | 46 | 16.0% | |
| custom 5467891257873289677 | 42 | 14.6% | |
| custom 5467867579718587715 | 33 | 11.5% | |
| custom 5469657846641610327 | 14 | 4.88% | |
| custom 5470036319159733420 | 11 | 3.83% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 287reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mucho_kaka. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 June 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
✉️ Новое анонимное откровение Как-то в детстве подруга у меня в гостях высрала мелкую какаху специально на пол рядом с унитазом. И решила переложить вину на нашу кошку.... И ей это удалось. Но потом она смеясь мне призналась...... Поделиться своим откровением
custom 54675735161927334916custom 54696578466416103273custom 54678912578732896772custom 54678675797185877151custom 54700363191597334201
✉️ Новое анонимное откровение Мяли ли вы когда нибудь свое говно? Я вот в детстве один раз так сжала его, аж до сих пор помню этот запах и консистенцию Не помню, по какой причине я захотела это сделать, ну а че, ребенку интересно, что это такое
💩18custom 54678912578732896773custom 54696578466416103273
✉️ Новое анонимное откровение Говоря о запоре, и как я поборолась с ним Я живу за городом, и тут все прелести на ладони: черника, крыжовник, щавель, малина, и другие вкусные приколы Каждый день я объедаюсь этим и знаете - стул у меня отличный стал!!! Так что всем побольше ягод и фруктов, главное мойте
custom 520644420758512049810💩6custom 54678675797185877151
✉️ Новое анонимное откровение Запор уже 2 дня. А через 4 часа поезд, сутки придется провести в дороге. Принимаю волевое решение посрать во чтобы то ни стало, а то в поезде постоянно какие-то проблемы со смывом. Ну сел, тужусь сквозь слезы, чтобы вышло хоть что-то. Но видимо были приняты усилия такого масштаба, что у меня резко скакануло давление и в глазах потемнело. На минуту будто даже отключился. Стало не хватат…
custom 546757351619273349115
Ретрит с запашком
custom 546789125787328967710custom 54675735161927334913
✉️ Новое анонимное откровение Один раз оказался в ситуации, где сильно приспичило и в туалете не было никакой возможности подтереться. Даже выкинутого клочка бумаги. Но был освежитель воздуха ультра свежая сирень. Я не придумал ничего лучше, чем брызнуть её на очко, чтобы хотя бы не вонять. Потом я весь день оставлял за собой шлейф нишего аромата сирени с говном. Поделиться своим откровением
custom 520644420758512049814custom 54675735161927334913custom 54678912578732896772
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 54700363191597334208custom 54678675797185877154custom 54678912578732896773custom 54696578466416103272
✉️ Новое анонимное откровение Спросонья утром уронил целый рулон туалетки в толчок. Можно считать, что я изобрел свою влажную туалетную бумагу? Руки в говне, пришлось доставать, чтобы не забить трубу. Мне не стыдно, но вы будьте аккуратнее. Опасность в жизни действительно подстерегает на каждом шагу. Поделиться своим откровением
custom 546757351619273349120custom 54678675797185877151custom 54696578466416103271
✉️ Новое анонимное откровение Почему никто до сих пор не поднял здесь тему шоколадной крошки в трусах? Вчера был проклятый день на эту хуйню. Пошел покакал и пришлось раз 5 подтираться. Потому что каждый раз я на бумаге видел эти микро камешки кала! Потом еще из под ногтей вымывал. Через час чесал жопу - достал еще один. Я себя чувствую бля песочным человеком, мой кал расщепляется на мелкие частицы Поделиться с…
custom 546757351619273349117custom 54678912578732896775custom 54678675797185877153custom 54696578466416103273
🖍️ В СССР не какали, а значит и туалетной бумаги не было Но был жаргон Пипифакс, коим долгое время обозначали как сам рулон, так и любую альтернативу подтирания. Слово это заморское, точной этимологии не имеет. С немецкого обозначает «Пустяк/Мелочь». В США же была настойка с одноименным названием, которую могли использовать в медицинских целях для профилактики заднего прохода. Информация из сомнительного источника…
custom 54675735161927334916custom 52064442075851204982custom 54696578466416103272custom 54700363191597334202💩1
Админ в деревенском отпуске
💩17custom 52064442075851204983
Photo, posted without a caption
💩11
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @mucho_kaka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,121,753 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“как ты покакал сегодня✨” (@mucho_kaka), 287 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mucho_kaka.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.