Ну как там с деньгами?
- Какими деньгами?63%
- Деньги есть38%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Channel
@mtw_promo
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
40subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003077906842 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mtw_promo |
| Description | Филиал @public_thought_collection Автор @sudoku76life |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 13 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mtw_promo |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:30 | 40 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:31 | 40 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
85 reactions across 19 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👾 | 85 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 85reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 October 2025 to 11 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ну как там с деньгами?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Ну как? Уже привык к автобусам? Есть два человека: один учится экономить, другой живет на широкую ногу, стараясь увеличить свой заработок Знаешь что будет с каждым из них через 5 лет? Один будет питаться хлебом с водой, а другой жить в Москоу-Сити Будешь продолжать экономить? Нет, я достоин лучшего
👾8
Если у тебя мало денег, значит ты мыслишь как малоимущий Ты не выкупаешь, что такое информация Правильная информация - это знание о точке опоры, в которую можно опереться и перевернуть весь мир Я такой какой я есть, поскольку на последние деньги я не брезговал покупать консультации и знания о своей сфере Чужой опыт и знания дороже всего
👾9
💸 Вас псиопают на нищету Матрица хочет видеть тебя слабым
👾4
Вы вообще в курсе, сколько зарабатывают чаттеры на онлике? Что они от родителей съезжают, делают минимум тысячу бачей в месяц? Кстати, этому я тоже обучаю Этим летом сам работал чаттером и получал достаточно неплохо Это лучшая работа для старта
👾8
MWT - это не темка. Мы учим создавать стабильный доход с трафика, который можно увеличивать и масштабировать И пока вам "страшно же", пока вы думаете, что "может не получиться" - так все и будет. Вы сами себя убедили в своей слабости. Обрекли на поражение Первому, кто напишет, отдам MWT за 7000 5000р. Это будет награда за желание перестать искать оправдания и ныть
👾6
Не я все понимаю, но закидывать 7к за темку, которая может не получиться как то страшно же
👾3
14, 15, 16, 17.. Да хоть 30 лет Выйди на лёгкую сотку в месяц. Это вовсе несложно Тебе нужно определить вектор движения, получить от меня актуальный гайд по хаслу и каждый день прикладывать небольшие усилия Готов отдать 7% от своего будущего дохода чтобы потом получать 100% от него? Да? Так чего же ты стоишь как девственник у борделя?) Ты сам знаешь что делать.
👾5
Ахуенный проект, комьюнити только образуется, так что считай, что успел одним из первых запрыгнуть в вагон. Здесь тебе не стесняются прямым текстом сказать где и на чем тебя наебывают инфлюинсеры Способы работают, предлагают разные варианты, если есть вопросы — можешь обратиться в чат или непосредственно к автору, проигнорированным в конечном итоге не останешься. Продукт свежий, ждем дополнение материалов, отзывов …
👾6
Помните на что пошел Гриффит ради своей мечты?! А вот в MWT вы исполните все свои желания без всяких папиков Действуйте.
👾6
Как реально вылезти из ямы? Ну вот ты осознал что ты находишься на дне Самым глупым решением будет жёстко упарываться в плоское саморазвитие: холодный душ, книги, пробежки в 5 утра и т.д. Все эти вещи не приносят реального импакта, лишь отнимают уйму времени. Еще опасно то, что они создают иллюзию роста, которого на самом деле нет Первым делом нужно заработать достаточно денег, а потом уже добавлять в свою жизнь …
👾5
Хочешь к нам в команду?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👾3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mtw_promo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Ну как там с деньгами?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Хочешь к нам в команду?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 October 2025 to 11 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 156,415 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MWT - Твой билет в новую жизнь” (@mtw_promo), 40 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mtw_promo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.