2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 65–67 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Aug 2026, 23:00
66
no change
10 Aug 2026, 22:47
66
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 28 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
108.0%
avg views ÷ 66 subscribers
Avg views / post
71.3
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
15.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held
17 (28 November 2025 – 3 August 2026)
Views total
285
Reactions total
44
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Aug 2026, 23:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
476
Videos
38
Links
72
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
50s
Average length
50s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
166 reactions across 17 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
76
45.8%
🔥
26
15.7%
💔
20
12.0%
😁
13
7.83%
👍
9
5.42%
❤🔥
4
2.41%
🙈
4
2.41%
😢
3
1.81%
😱
3
1.81%
🤩
3
1.81%
👀
2
1.20%
🤬
2
1.20%
💯
1
0.602%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 166reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 28 November 2025 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#потік
Сьогодні нарешті забрав новий загран. Це мій вже 3й по черзі. Так дивно. Дивишся на дату до якої він дійсний, там 36 рік, він здається таким далеким... але згадую що коли отримував попеедній, то 26й мені теж здавався безмежно далеким.
Минулий раз я отримував його якраз перед тим як податись на Шенген... (Більшість вже й забули що то було за весела пригода 😅) Тоді я в перший раз їхав на закордонний зук івент. І…
#потік
Що таке не жити в країні "першого світу". Це коли можеш записатись в приватну клініку до стоматолога на наступний день. Тобі зроблять КТ зубів, фторування і поставлять пломбу (з анастезією звісно) за один підхід і здеруть з тебе шалені 50$ Жах! 😅
#програмування
Зрозумів, не те щоб лайфхак, але важливий принцип комунікації з ШІ коли він щось створює для тебе. Наприклад коли пише тобі текст чи код і коли ти йому ставиш досить велику задачу.
Приклад. В мене на роботі вже був проект в який треба було дописати новий функціонал і от я розумію що часто модель галюцинує від того що в неї є питання по ходу виконання але вона не може їх задати в процесі і через це обир…
#поток
А тим часом Колондарю вже пів рочку 😊 Насправді вийшла дуже корисна річ. Не тільки як календар і планер а і як нотатник спогадів що і коли зі мною відбувалось. А фото-стікери ще й гарно все те ілюструють і відновлюють в пам'яті 😌
#потік
Є дуже гарна і талановита, у всіх проявах, людина в якої сьогодні день народження 🥳
І в рамках подарунку (якого вона хотіла) хочу запропонувати всім хто бачить це повідомлення зайти і послухати її пісень
https://youtube.com/@kinichazla
https://open.spotify.com/album/01fvWQHmeFwnvWrygOa3ao
https://music.apple.com/de/artist/kinich-azla/1765191319
Її пісні стали для мене ковтком свіжого повітря, а деякі розчулюв…
#програмування #поток
Власне для тих хто хоче дізнатись що то був за дивний запит у попередньому пості - я почав потроху розробляти свою гру використовуючи нові технології і експерементуючи з новими можливостями.
Для техноблогу завів окремий канальчик https://t.me/cosmopolia_dev_story
#поток #програмування
Треба оце було мені запитати у ШІ його думку, а не просто думку, а глибоке дослідження (Deep Research), бо Gemini в цьому прям хорош. І дослідження то було про цікаву ідею гри, яка крутиться в моїй голові. Але не хотів він, курво, працювать. Запит був чималий, бо детальний, але не так, щоб аж дуже. Постійно викидав то помилку 1099, то 1076. Я вже почав гуглить, чи не поламали мені мій Gemini (за…
Не знаю, що тут написати в якості коментаря. Це важка пісня, яка важко мені далася, і мені іноді дуже хочеться жити в тій гілці реальності, в якій писати цю пісню не було підстав.
Але я дякую всім, хто допомагав в її створенні – особливо Ясику, який записав і звів всі партії, і Толіку, який чарівно зіграв на скрипці.
В описі відео також посилання на аніматора (чомусь коли тут пощу, то постійно це посилання збоїть), …
#поток
Нічого надзвичайного, просто сніжинки на склі мого авто ❄️
❤11❤🔥4
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @msofme. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 798,349 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Many shades of Myst” (@msofme), 66 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/msofme.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.