1 May 2026, 06:03 UTC390 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @JobplacementsamarthPhoto
Photo, posted without a caption
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @hrfootprints/23965 Jul 2025, 06:33 UTC | @mselhr/1398 · this entry5 Jul 2025, 06:33 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @hrfootprints/239712 Jul 2025, 10:02 UTC | @mselhr/1399 · this entry12 Jul 2025, 10:03 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @hrfootprints/239824 Jul 2025, 15:47 UTC | @mselhr/1401 · this entry24 Jul 2025, 15:47 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @mselhr/1404 · this entry29 Aug 2025, 19:35 UTC | @hrfootprints/240129 Aug 2025, 19:36 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @hrfootprints/24026 Dec 2025, 17:09 UTC | @mselhr/1405 · this entry6 Dec 2025, 17:10 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @hrfootprints | 11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @hrfootprints (9–2) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 7 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 13 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 July 2025 to 18 April 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
- Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
- 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
- shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
- Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @hrfootprints. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.