قناة المنصة الرسمية على الواتساب 👇🏻 فيها كل شيء جديد يومياً https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb8JkpiFXUueTyHGik25
❤2🤩2

Channel
@mrz_s1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
63,484subscribers
-1,684 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001216133157 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mrz_s1 |
| Description | القناة الرسمية لمرزوق البريك سنوات في بناء المشاريع الرقمية والإلكترونية بالخبرة والتطبيق، الذكاء الاصطناعي مساعدي الشخصي، أشارك الرحلة كاملة خطوة بخطوة - تطبيق لا كلام سنابي 👇🏻 https://snapchat.com/t/ZbswPPCf |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mrz_s1 |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 06:41 | 63,484 | -249 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 10:15 | 63,733 | -48 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 12:36 | 63,781 | -53 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 19:37 | 63,834 | -83 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 04:42 | 63,917 | -47 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 23:16 | 63,964 | -141 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 17:55 | 64,105 | -121 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 07:36 | 64,226 | -24 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 21:45 | 64,250 | -63 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 22:47 | 64,313 | -29 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 23:59 | 64,342 | -42 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:12 | 64,384 | -48 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:54 | 64,432 | -36 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:27 | 64,468 | -30 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:53 | 64,498 | -36 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 21:07 | 64,534 | -29 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:22 | 64,563 | -37 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:43 | 64,600 | -86 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:25 | 64,686 | -63 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 15:37 | 64,749 | first reading |
45 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 111 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 45 (18 July 2026 – 28 September 2026) |
| Views total | 62,540 |
| Reactions total | 134 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Sept 2026, 03:41 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
359 reactions across 42 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 203 | 56.5% | |
| 👍 | 50 | 13.9% | |
| 🔥 | 40 | 11.1% | |
| 👏 | 27 | 7.52% | |
| 💯 | 17 | 4.74% | |
| 🤩 | 17 | 4.74% | |
| 🤝 | 4 | 1.11% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.279% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 45 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 359 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 28 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
قناة المنصة الرسمية على الواتساب 👇🏻 فيها كل شيء جديد يومياً https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb8JkpiFXUueTyHGik25
❤2🤩2
🚀 أداة جديدة في المنصة حاسبة تسعير خدمتك وهذي مفتوحة للجميع بدون تسجيل أكثر سؤال يتكرر على المستقل: بكم أسعّر شغلي؟ وأغلبهم يجاوب بالنظر لأسعار غيره، فيطلع رقم ما له علاقة بوضعه هو الأداة تشتغل بالعكس: تدخل أرقامك أنت وتطلع لك: ▪️ سعر الساعة المطلوب والسعر المقترح للخدمة ▪️ ثلاث باقات جاهزة تعرضها على عميلك ▪️ شرح يوريك كيف طلع الرقم خطوة خطوة ▪️ تنبيه لو أرقامك ما تمشي مع بعض والنتيجة تنسخها أو تحفظها صورة وت…
💯2
Posted without readable text
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته مساء الخير فيه شي ألاحظه في الأعمال المحلية الصغيرة المطعم، والعيادة، والمشغل، ومحل الصيانة كثير بلا موقع والسبب اللي يقولونه واحد: الموقع مكلف، ومين بيتابعه؟ وهذا كان صحيح قبل سنوات اليوم اختلف الوضع لأن صاحب العمل الصغير ما يبي موقع فيه لوحة تحكم وحسابات ونظام حجوزات يبي شي واحد: إن الزبون يشوف خدماته، ويقدر يتواصل معه بضغطة وهذي تنحل بصفحة واحدة بنيت صفحة كاملة لعيادة أسنا…
❤1
3 مشاريع بدون برمجة، من الفكرة حتى التسليم موقع كامل لعمل محلي، وزر الحجز فيه يفتح واتساب برسالة معبأة بكل بيانات العميل وأداة تسعير تفاعلية ترفعها على متجرك ولوحة تحليل تلصق فيها أرقام مبيعاتك فتطلع رسوم وخلاصة الفيديو كامل في القناة 👇🏻 https://youtu.be/4y_BEPvwuDw?si=MOVPff2U5zFe6czv
❤8🤩1
إحصائية اليوم أمس نزل من أنثروبيك نموذج جديد اسمه Opus 5.5، وأعلنوا معه رقمين أسرع من سابقه بأكثر من ٣٠٪ وتكلفة تشغيله أقل بـ ٤٠٪ الرقمين هذي تهم اللي يشغّل أدوات على الذكاء، لأن كل طلب يمر على النموذج له تكلفة بس فيه نقطة ثالثة ذكروها، وهي اللي تفرق مع أي واحد يكتب محتوى قالوا إن النموذج صار يلتزم بقواعد الكتابة اللي تعطيه طيب ليش هذي مهمة؟ لأن أكثر شكوى من النصوص اللي يكتبها الذكاء إنها تبان مكتوبة بذكاء و…
❤3
نصيحة لأي أحد يجهز يطلق منتج لا تحكم على منتجك من مبيعات أول يوم أغلب الناس ما يشترون الشي الجديد أول ما ينزل حسب إحصاءات إطلاق المنتجات، تقريبا ١٥٪ بس يشترون في البداية وقريب النص يستنون يستنون يشوفون أحد جرّب قبلهم، ويسمعون وش قال فلو أطلقت وجاك خمسة مشترين بس، لا تزعل ولا توقف هالخمسة أهم ناس عندك في هالمرحلة لأنهم هم اللي بيقولون للباقين إن المنتج يستاهل طيب وش تسوي معهم؟ تعطيهم كم يوم يجربون المنتج على راحتهم بع…
❤6👍3👏1💯1
أكثر جملة تجي لصاحب أي منتج غالي وأغلبنا يرد عليها بطريقة وحدة، ينزّل السعر بس قبل ما تنزّل، جرّب تسأل نفسك سؤال ثاني هل الزائر أصلاً فهم كيف يشتغل منتجك؟ خلني أوضح الفكرة لما تكتب عن منتجك، أغلبنا يكتب اسمه ووش يعطيك دورة تعلّمك التسويق ملف يساعدك تنظّم شغلك نظام للمحتوى وهذا كلام صحيح، بس ما فيه شي يخلي الواحد يفهم كيف بيوصل للنتيجة والمشتري اللي قدامك غالباً دفع قبل كذا وما وصل لشي فهو ما عاد يصدق الوعد، صار يدور …
❤4
آخر مرة ترددت فيها عن شراء شي، وش كان أكثر شي وقفك؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤2👏1
وقفة صغيرة قبل ما ننام كلنا صار لنا موقف وقفنا فيه قدام شي نبي نشتريه، وفي آخر لحظة تراجعنا سعره واضح، والكلام عنه حلو، ومع ذلك ما كملنا وبعد كم يوم ننسى الموضوع كله أنا صار لي كثير، وأغلب المرات ما كان السعر هو السبب الحقيقي كان فيه شي ناقص ما قدرت أحدده وقتها، بس كان يخليني ما أثق إني بستفيد فعلاً واللي انتبهت له لاحقاً إن السبب يتكرر الشي اللي تردد فيه غالباً ما كان واضح لك كيف بيشتغل معك أنت بالذات تحسه يناسب ناس…
وهذا ملف فيه ثلاثين برومت جاهز للتصميم بالذكاء الاصطناعي كل برومت تنسخه زي ما هو، تغير فيه اللي يخصك وترسله
👏6❤2🤩2
أنت وين موقعك مع الذكاء الاصطناعي
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @mrz_s1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
آخر مرة ترددت فيها عن شراء شي، وش كان أكثر شي وقفك؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
أنت وين موقعك مع الذكاء الاصطناعي
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
سؤالي لكم، وينكم من أدسنس؟
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
سؤالي لكم، تحققتم من النموذج الضريبي في حساباتكم؟
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 28 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 21 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مرزوق البريك | الثروة الرقمية” (@mrz_s1), 63,484 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mrz_s1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.