Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

MRTPHS | МОРТИ

@mrtphs

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

271subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003795523173
TypeChannel
Username@mrtphs
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mrtphs

Growth

2718 Aug 2026, 11:01 — 271 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 08:21 — 271 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 11:019 Aug 2026, 08:21
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 270–272 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 08:21271no change
8 Aug 2026, 11:01271first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 7 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
100.2%
avg views ÷ 271 subscribers
Avg views / post
272
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
21.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held14 (7 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total2,715
Reactions total571
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 04s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

825 reactions across 14 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 531902650168799209429035.2%
custom 519500647774765707617020.6%
custom 618121947530029307016520.0%
custom 524937569994856596813216.0%
custom 6181478191245303198688.24%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 825reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
131
across the posts below
Posts paid on
14
of 14 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
40
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mrtphs. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 13:29 UTC148 views61 reactions31 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤩скучали?)))) моя подруга сказала, что если бы она со мной не общалась, она бы подумала, что я впала в депрессию СЛАВА БОГУ ЭТО НЕ ТАК ну че, рассказывайте, что там в обновлениях было, там какой-то цирк вышел и рожденная луной 2 будет, да? 😳 tiktok: пошла эта конченная блядота нахуй, почему-то эдит недоступен, хотя никаких ограничений нет (p.s. если этого актера возьмут на роль циклопа - я вернусь в фд марвел)

custom 531902650168799209427custom 524937569994856596818custom 618121947530029307016

21 Jul 2026, 10:38 UTC390 views33 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

шаурмичечка, спасибо за подарок и за постоянную поддержку 💋💋💋💋 (ты прямо шугар мами среди эдиторов АХАХАХАХ)

custom 531902650168799209417custom 61812194753002930708custom 61814781912453031988

21 Jul 2026, 10:21 UTC326 views62 reactions25 Starsread 8 August 2026
Video

ебала я в рот эти попытки во флоу🤗🤗🤗 и храни господь эдди редмейна 🤩 #edit@mrtphs

custom 618147819124530319826custom 519500647774765707616custom 618121947530029307014custom 52493756999485659684custom 53190265016879920942

20 Jul 2026, 16:08 UTC284 views72 reactions10 Starsread 8 August 2026
Video

СЕГОДНЯ ДВОЙНОЙ ЗАВОЗ ib/rm artemiserid #edit@mrtphs

custom 531902650168799209433custom 524937569994856596821custom 618121947530029307018

20 Jul 2026, 13:52 UTC284 views76 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026
Video

это мой sexy back 🫥 я б с таким священником уверовала tiktok: тык sp adriscenes ac lzytte #edit@mrtphs

custom 531902650168799209432custom 519500647774765707623custom 524937569994856596821

19 Jul 2026, 00:02 UTC243 views52 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! морти, лапа моя. ты лучшая и несравненная эдиторша. твои работы - истинное блаженство, которое я бы с удовольствием набила как татушку знакомство с тобой - это та часть моей биографии, которую я не забуду. и нет, дело не в том, насколько абсурдно и внезапно мы познакомились, а в том, какое это знакомство приятное и чудесное оказалось в итоге перерывы нужны всем и каждому, главно

custom 531902650168799209425custom 519500647774765707613custom 524937569994856596812custom 61812194753002930702

17 Jul 2026, 14:30 UTC280 views86 reactions40 Starsread 8 August 2026

какой же кайф когда не НУЖНО ДЕЛАТЬ БЛЯДСКИЕ КАРТИНКИ 354654 ЧАСОВ ЧТОБЫ СДЕЛАТЬ ЭДИТ 🤩🤩🤩 tt тык ib elvatisq #edit@mrtphs

custom 531902650168799209438custom 618147819124530319823custom 519500647774765707619custom 52493756999485659686

16 Jul 2026, 21:10 UTC292 views42 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! кись, привет, это солвкс. мне просто хочется сказать, что ты то самое золото во вселенной вн. честно, не хватает таких профессионалов, как ты и я хочу вечно упоминать о тебе и равняться на тебя отдых это, конечно, важно, но я всегда буду ждать от тебя каких-либо видео, не в зависимости от того, какой это фандом будет. у тебя есть стиль и он невероятно приятный, аккуратный, качест

custom 531902650168799209422custom 519500647774765707611custom 61812194753002930709

16 Jul 2026, 21:06 UTC235 views40 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! Как вы пришли к тому, что хотите рисовать визуальные новеллы? честно? ваще случайно, никогда не думала что буду в таком учавствовать когда я начала играть в клуб романтики, я сделала фан арт с давидом (ща смотрю на него и думаю, ну и выблядок), закинула его в группу по кр в вк. там меня нашла замечательная девушка, которая позвала учавствовать в проекте по созданию визуальной но

custom 531902650168799209422custom 524937569994856596812custom 51950064777476570766

16 Jul 2026, 19:56 UTC233 views47 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! Надеюсь, что у тебя появятся силы и вдохновение, потому что я постоянно пересматриваю твои эдиты. Но всем нужно отдыхать. Всё равно я продолжу репостить и пересматривать любые твои видео на любую тему спасибо огромное 🥹❤️ для меня очень ценно, что кому-то нравятся эдиты не только из-за персонажей/самого факта наличия визуальных новелл, но и из-за самого стиля 😭

custom 531902650168799209426custom 524937569994856596815custom 61814781912453031986

10 Jul 2026, 21:19 UTC382 views74 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! привет. я влюблена в твой канал, в твоё творчество. а твои видео >>>>> как долго ты училась монтировать? если у тебя какие-нибудь советы? спасибо тебе большое, что ты существуешь 💞 во-первых, спасибо большое за такие приятные слова, мне нужно было это услышать 🥲 во-вторых, мне кажется в этом деле, как и в любом творческом, ты всегда будешь находиться в процессе обучения, поэтому

custom 519500647774765707632custom 618121947530029307021custom 531902650168799209418custom 52493756999485659682custom 61814781912453031981

10 Jul 2026, 20:14 UTC≈1,490 views98 reactions12 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

😈😈😈😈😈😈 yeah i gotta hurt you i gotta hear it from your mouth #легион@mrtphs #цепидоговора@mrtphs

custom 618121947530029307045custom 531902650168799209428custom 519500647774765707618custom 61814781912453031984custom 52493756999485659683

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @mrtphs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 126,160 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MRTPHS | МОРТИ” (@mrtphs), 271 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mrtphs.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.