Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for MRG Community

Channel

MRG Community

@mrgminer

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

329,067subscribers

+204,758 since we began measuring on 17 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003965869097
TypeChannel
Username@mrgminer
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 31 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded17 September 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/mrgminer

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

265,000 average views per post against 331,573 subscribers — an engagement rate of 80.0%. Across the 1,156 registered channels in the same cohort — 316,384–999,488 subscribers — the middle half sit between 1.56% and 11.2%, with a median of 4.14%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (5 October 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Posts measured21 of 21 published in the window (0 exact, 21 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled5,573,800
Mature posts only90.1% over 18 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers331,573 measured 3 November 2026
Cohortb316228 · 1,156 channels · p10 0.435% · p25 1.56% · p50 4.14% · p75 11.2% · p90 23.8%
Position in cohort99.913th percentile · 19.3× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.09% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageEnglish · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 4 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

124,309368,074246,191.517 September 2026 — 124,309 subscribers18 September 2026 — 149,574 subscribers1 October 2026 — 301,548 subscribers6 October 2026 — 315,643 subscribers10 October 2026 — 325,888 subscribers13 October 2026 — 350,544 subscribers15 October 2026 — 355,749 subscribers16 October 2026 — 359,504 subscribers17 October 2026 — 361,642 subscribers18 October 2026 — 360,420 subscribers19 October 2026 — 361,191 subscribers20 October 2026 — 362,510 subscribers21 October 2026 — 363,022 subscribers22 October 2026 — 364,108 subscribers23 October 2026 — 365,465 subscribers24 October 2026 — 366,162 subscribers25 October 2026 — 367,248 subscribers26 October 2026 — 367,649 subscribers27 October 2026 — 367,943 subscribers28 October 2026 — 368,074 subscribers29 October 2026 — 367,989 subscribers30 October 2026 — 350,353 subscribers31 October 2026 — 343,262 subscribers1 November 2026 — 339,128 subscribers2 November 2026 — 334,175 subscribers3 November 2026 — 331,573 subscribers4 November 2026 — 329,067 subscribers329,06717 September 20264 November 2026
27 measurements spanning 48 days, net +204,758. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 87,744–404,639 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 08:47329,067-2,506
3 Nov 2026, 07:16331,573-2,602
2 Nov 2026, 08:46334,175-4,953
1 Nov 2026, 07:37339,128-4,134
31 Oct 2026, 07:54343,262-7,091
30 Oct 2026, 09:31350,353-17,636
29 Oct 2026, 12:56367,989-85
28 Oct 2026, 14:06368,074+131
27 Oct 2026, 14:17367,943+294
26 Oct 2026, 16:20367,649+401
25 Oct 2026, 16:35367,248+1,086
24 Oct 2026, 18:06366,162+697
23 Oct 2026, 20:28365,465+1,357
22 Oct 2026, 16:57364,108+1,086
21 Oct 2026, 08:51363,022+512
20 Oct 2026, 06:35362,510+1,319
19 Oct 2026, 05:07361,191+771
18 Oct 2026, 02:36360,420-1,222
17 Oct 2026, 01:46361,642+2,138
16 Oct 2026, 02:27359,504first reading

Engagement

75 posts held, back to 11 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 86 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
79.8%
avg views ÷ 329,067 subscribers
Avg views / post
262,000
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.46%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 75 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 October 2026
Posts held75 (11 September 2026 – 28 October 2026)
Views total5,249,800
Reactions total233,901
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Oct 2026, 08:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 26s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

627,214 reactions across 75 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤315,71450.3%
👍103,50516.5%
🥰32,6605.21%
👏32,5675.19%
🔥28,5824.56%
😍26,5094.23%
🤯15,1932.42%
🤔7,8151.25%
🆒7,5771.21%
👀7,3821.18%
💯5,6350.898%
🫡5,3720.856%
❤‍🔥4,6990.749%
💘4,1410.66%
🤩3,7540.599%
😎3,5330.563%
🤝2,9910.477%
⚡2,7400.437%
🍓2,3730.378%
😇2,2780.363%
11 further kinds12,1941.94%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 75 of the 75 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 627,214 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 75 most recent posts we hold, published 11 September 2026 to 28 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
914
across the posts below
Posts paid on
71
of 75 we hold a reading for · 95%
Most on one post
110
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mrgminer. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 75 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 September 2026 to 28 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Oct 2026, 14:52 UTC≈64,800 views7,237 reactions4 Starsread 29 October 2026

Voting will close at exactly the same time tomorrow, and further steps will be taken for the good of the community. 👌

❤3,560👍1,760🤯473👏249👀188😍188👌186🥰160

28 Oct 2026, 14:30 UTC≈68,000 views6,524 reactions4 Starsread 29 October 2026
Poll

Vote for MRG Migration & Relaunch 🗳

  1. Yes ✅ (i vote for migration)79%
  2. No 🚫 (i don't want any changes)21%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤3,490👍1,630🥰462🤔150🤯145👀143👏131🤝94

28 Oct 2026, 14:02 UTC≈66,000 views1,841 reactionsread 29 October 2026

❤️ Important Update for the MRG Community Dear Miner Rare Gram family ❤️‍🔥 We want to be open and honest with you about where $MRG stands today. After a large wave of withdrawals, the value of $MRG, the native token of the Miner Rare Gram Mini App, has dropped sharply. We have been watching the situation closely, and we believe the token can't recover from its current state on its own. So we are proposing a token m…

❤1,010👍447🤯109😱48🙏40🆒40👀38🤝37

25 Oct 2026, 16:38 UTC≈131,000 views16,875 reactions20 Starsread 29 October 2026
Photo

⬆️ MRG Reaches 28,000+ Onchain Holders! 📱 28,000 holders, one growing community. Thank you for being part of the MRG journey. This milestone belongs to all of you, and we’re just getting started! 🏳️ Verify on TON Viewer: [https://tonviewer.com/EQDj-zlSvj4Au154XjsU7ATzt13p8JjYEs0weVv1rVbCJSn0?section=holders]

❤8,090🔥3,050👍2,380😍447🙏442🥰441👀438🤝399

20 Oct 2026, 18:44 UTC≈264,000 views22,669 reactions26 Starsread 29 October 2026
Video

⬆️ Mrg miner task rewards have increased to nearly 3x. Don't miss your opportunity to claim free daily $MRG ❤️Start Mining $MRG — LIVE NOW MRG Special Link's - YouTube |Follow 𝕏 |Buy on STONFI

❤11,200👍4,820👏1,950🔥711🥰698🤯683😍603🫡511

19 Oct 2026, 11:27 UTC≈281,000 views11,026 reactions13 Starsread 29 October 2026

We sincerely apologize for the insufficient GRAM fees in our wallet, which caused some valuable users' withdrawals to be declined and refunded. Please kindly reconsider your withdrawal. We are truly sorry for the inconvenience.

❤5,540👍2,660👀720🔥337👏300😍296🤩294🫡224

18 Oct 2026, 13:35 UTC≈307,000 views9,738 reactions2 Starsread 29 October 2026

⬆️ MRG Miners, are you happy with the current speed of withdrawal? 🍳 MRG Holders, don't miss the opportunity to take advantage of the MRG dip. Buy on STON.FI (DYOR) - https://app.ston.fi/swap?chartVisible=false&ft=GRAM&tt=EQDj-zlSvj4Au154XjsU7ATzt13p8JjYEs0weVv1rVbCJSn0 Something big coming soon. 📱

❤4,780👍2,400👏717🤯312🤔277👀270💯265🥰181

17 Oct 2026, 20:44 UTC≈301,000 views11,583 reactions7 Starsread 29 October 2026
Photo

❤️ Dear MRG Miners, We are closely monitoring the recent $MRG price decline, driven by the drop in GRAM's price and significant selling pressure from holders. 🔑 Bot Farming Investigation We are currently investigating 1,373 accounts suspected of bot farming that received withdrawals and subsequently sold their rewards, contributing to the selling pressure. Accounts confirmed to be abusing the system will be permanen…

❤5,780👍2,840👏999🫡278🤯277🤗276👀267😍221

17 Oct 2026, 10:40 UTC≈181,000 views7,000 reactions21 Starsread 29 October 2026

❤️

❤3,870🤔970👍626👀295🥰281🍓170🙏170👏169

14 Oct 2026, 15:46 UTC≈274,000 views18,043 reactions33 Starsread 29 October 2026
Video

❤️ let's send it to the 1Million milestone 😀 #mrg

❤9,530🥰2,370👏1,790👍832🔥727🤯569🆒480🍓441

12 Oct 2026, 09:27 UTC≈352,000 views17,828 reactions16 Starsread 29 October 2026

Everything has been fixed and working super smooth. Keep mining 🧚

❤8,520👍4,080👏1,470🔥635😘457🤔456🥰454🫡441

12 Oct 2026, 08:16 UTC≈404,000 views7,632 reactions6 Starsread 29 October 2026

Dear Community, Due to high traffic, the MRG Miner Telegram MiniApp is opening slowly. Our team is actively working on a fix. Please be patient and stay tuned!

❤4,160👍1,660😍486🔥247🤯203🫡194🥰187👏128

Showing the 12 most recent of 75 posts we hold for @mrgminer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@mrgminer edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
20 September 2026
Most recent edit
24 September 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @mrgminer as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
20 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
20 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
16 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Oct 2026, 14:30 UTCAnonymous Poll14,600 voters approx.

Vote for MRG Migration & Relaunch 🗳

  1. Yes ✅ (i vote for migration)79%
  2. No 🚫 (i don't want any changes)21%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 75 most recent posts we hold, published 11 September 2026 to 28 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MRG Community” (@mrgminer), 329,067 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mrgminer.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.