Channel
@mrfarepnft
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
46subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002646614562 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mrfarepnft |
| Description | Новости из мира NFT🎁 Наш чат - https://t.me/sellbuynftx Только самое важное и интересное Предложить новость - @mrfarepov Сотрудничество - @mrfarepov |
| Created | 15 May 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mrfarepnft |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 46 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:01 | 46 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 15 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
21 reactions across 6 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 4 | 19.0% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 19.0% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 14.3% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 9.52% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 9.52% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 9.52% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 4.76% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 4.76% | |
| 😐 | 1 | 4.76% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 4.76% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 15 May 2025 to 25 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💲 Самое дорогое кольцо На Pre-Market Tonnel было выставлено самое редкое кольцо за 5000 TON (≈ 15 000$) — и уже через 30 минут его купили. Если через 21 день продавец не передаст кольцо, он потеряет 1000 ton
🎁 КОЛЬЦОМ 🎁 БИЦЕПСОМ 🎁 КОЛЬЦОМ за 500 звезд + 🎁 КИРПИЧАМИ (не предлагать овер) + кучей разных мелких подарков по типу 🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁 писать в лс @mrfarepov
💲 Самый дорогой календарь На Tonnel продан календарь с названием «Задачи взрослой жизни» — на календаре сношаются кролики, а сам фон у подарка тёмный. Сумма сделки составила 202 TON (≈ $622). 🐇 Хотели бы себе такой календарь в коллекцию?
😱2
Аккаунт с пятью NFT Sailor Moon ушёл за $10 000 (по $2 000 за штуку) выгода очевидна. Вопрос в другом: какой будет минимальная цена после апгрейда 🧐
👀1
💎 Собран список редкостей всех 2 подарков 💍 Gem Signet Models (50) 🗡️ Light Sword Models (52) — Источник @GiftChanges
Минимальный флор Pepe теперь 1600 💎 (5к$)
👍2🔥1😐1
🎉 Giveaway Finished! 🎉 Winners received the following gifts: 1. Lol Pop #169907 - Telegram Link (Internal Transfer)
📈 Подарки > $52 500 000 За последние 2 дня капитализация подарков выросла с 13 млн до 17 млн TON — это примерно $52 500 000 по текущему курсу. С 12 мая рынок показывает очень стремительный рост, тем самым на вторичном рынке за последние пару недель прошло 396 272 сделок, из которых 290 909 оказались прибыльными — больше 73%. — Источник giftstat.com
Telegram-подарки обошли OpenSea по объему торгов за 24 часа! Telegram gifts - $2 300 735 OpenSea - $2 200 000 Magic Eden - $1 800 000 Blur - $1 800 000 Dew - $603 000 OKX - $565 000
Всем спокойной ночи, до завтра!
Проект MINT набирает обороты! Сын Снуп Догга был замечен в кругу Джейсона Фаловича и Мануэля Штотца, сам рэпер обзавелся верифицированным Telegram-каналом. Это новый этап сотрудничества или просто совпадение? 🤔
небольшой розыгрыш для вас подъехал
👍2🥰2😁2
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @mrfarepnft. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“mr Farepov | NFT & GIFTS” (@mrfarepnft), 46 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mrfarepnft.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.