Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Mr Earning Tricks

Channel

Mr Earning Tricks

@mrearningtricksyt

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

690subscribers

-19 since we began measuring on 15 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002166949482
TypeChannel
Username@mrearningtricksyt
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded15 September 2026
Last confirmed live2 October 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/mrearningtricksyt

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 2 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

690709699.515 September 2026 — 709 subscribers17 September 2026 — 704 subscribers2 October 2026 — 690 subscribers15 September 20262 October 2026
3 measurements spanning 17 days, net -19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 687–712 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Oct 2026, 11:02690-14
17 Sept 2026, 04:39704-5
15 Sept 2026, 07:22709first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 14 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

33 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1545.5%
😁618.2%
👍412.1%
🤣412.1%
😭26.06%
😴13.03%
🤯13.03%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 14 April 2025 to 22 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Oct 2025, 16:04 UTC238 views2 reactionsread 15 September 2026
Photo

🤑 FREE $100+ Loot 💰 Link: https://pplx.ai/girlcyber977301 Process: 1) Open this link in your laptop/computer https://pplx.ai/girlcyber977301 2) download comet Browser 3) install it and login with your mail id 4) do any 3 searches in this new Browser 5) now share your link with any of your friends. You get 3$ for each friend. 6) Withdrawal Option Open After 30 Day's 💥 No Need mobile number 💥

🤯1😴1

7 Jun 2025, 02:06 UTC546 views7 reactionsread 15 September 2026
Photo

Eid Al-Adha Mubarak to All... 😇

❤7

1 Jun 2025, 07:26 UTC542 views3 reactionsread 15 September 2026
Photo

LayerEdge Claiming Started on CEX.. Claim :- CLICK HERE Listing Tomorrow on 2nd June

❤3

30 May 2025, 11:29 UTC488 views2 reactionsread 15 September 2026
Photo

Blum Checker Live.... Are you Eligible 🌚

😭2

30 May 2025, 06:55 UTC444 viewsread 15 September 2026
Photo

LayerEdge Listing $ EDGEN On Binance... Listing Date 📅 :- June 2

18 May 2025, 08:13 UTC429 views6 reactionsread 15 September 2026
Poll

Are You Still Mining BLUM 👀

  1. Yes35%
  2. No65%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

😁6

18 May 2025, 08:05 UTC382 views4 reactionsread 15 September 2026
Photo

🚨 Blum Co-Founder Vladimir Smerkis Arrested For Suspicion of Fraud Official $Blum team confirms he resigned as CMO, He’s no longer involved in the project or its future plans. 👀

🤣4

18 Apr 2025, 06:51 UTC626 views0 reactionsread 15 September 2026
Photo

Treasury New Secret Code ... Tap To Copy :- Bomb JOIN 👉 TREASURY_BOT

15 Apr 2025, 16:27 UTC602 views3 reactionsread 15 September 2026
Photo

HRUM Quote of the Day April 15... Tap To Copy :- Oprah Winfrey @HRUM_BOT

❤2👍1

15 Apr 2025, 15:50 UTC458 views1 reactionsread 15 September 2026
Photo

Treasury New Secret Code ... Tap To Copy :- Rain Man JOIN 👉 TREASURY_BOT

👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @mrearningtricksyt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

18 May 2025, 08:13 UTCAnonymous Poll65 voters

Are You Still Mining BLUM 👀

  1. Yes35%
  2. No65%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Apr 2025, 09:27 UTCAnonymous Poll67 voters

Paws 🐾 Listing Tomorrow 16 April... Let Predictions... How much they gives 🌝

  1. Good Amount40%
  2. Decent Amount21%
  3. Premium Dust39%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 14 April 2025 to 22 October 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

KAS Mentor®
@KASMentor · 25,046
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 15 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mr Earning Tricks” (@mrearningtricksyt), 690 subscribers as measured 2 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mrearningtricksyt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.