Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Доктор Самсонов /ФОНИАТР/ЛОР

Channel

Доктор Самсонов /ФОНИАТР/ЛОР

@mrdoctorlor

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

989subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001653148700
TypeChannel
Username@mrdoctorlor
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mrdoctorlor

Growth

9899919907 August 2026 — 990 subscribers8 August 2026 — 990 subscribers8 August 2026 — 991 subscribers16 August 2026 — 989 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 9 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 989–991 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 04:37989-2
8 Aug 2026, 03:01991+1
8 Aug 2026, 00:35990no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:42990first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

641 reactions across 20 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
19430.3%
🔥15424.0%
👍599.20%
❤‍🔥507.80%
🦄446.86%
👏243.74%
🗿203.12%
🎉142.18%
🥰142.18%
🕊121.87%
😁111.72%
🖕101.56%
🙏60.936%
🤩60.936%
💯50.78%
😍40.624%
🤮30.468%
👌20.312%
💊20.312%
😱20.312%
5 further kinds50.78%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 641reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 April 2025 to 3 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Jun 2026, 07:14 UTC459 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Пока все не разбежались, посмотрите какую статью опубликовали по результатам исследования! Будут еще. С уважением, В. Самсонов.

13👏7🔥3🗿1

1 Jun 2026, 11:03 UTC443 views40 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

28-29 проходил 14 конгресс Голова и Шея. Я выступал с двумя докладами и был в качестве организатора. Получил еще больше опыта в организации больших мероприятий. На этом конгрессе была большая профессиональная команда. Была возможность взглянуть на их работу. РУДН, конечно, в виду своего «размера», очень сложная площадка в этом плане. А еще у меня, если я правильно считаю, уже 5-й конгресс на счету в плане организа

21🔥10👍7🖕1🗿1

13 May 2026, 17:17 UTC693 views61 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Черт его знает, что сегодня было такое. Могу сказать, сегодня был первый раз когда я кайфанул от… доклада😧 Не знаю, может информация от Антона Николаевича или лайфхаки от Сидорцовой, приглашенной сообществом вокальных педагогов меня впечатлили. Сам для себя не могу объяснить, но чувство какое-то хорошее. Спасибо, что пришли послушать! 💜 С уважением, В. Самсонов.

33🔥17👏7🖕1🗿1🥰1🦄1

10 May 2026, 16:12 UTC785 views42 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Кажется, что сегодня тот самый день, когда стоит прервать молчание! Хочу немного поделиться мыслями по поводу предстоящего конгресса 12-14 мая в РУДН. Это уже традиция для нас, собираться там в мае и обсуждать, и делиться своими знаниями по поводу разных голосовых проблем. По моему мнению, в этом году я действительно готов поделиться че-то особенным. Этот период затишья не прошел зря. Наконец-то, спустя столько в

🔥20🥰9👍54🖕1🗿1🤔1🦄1

8 Sept 2025, 10:17 UTC≈1,980 views48 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Добрый день, товарищи! Хочу сказать спасибо всем, кто прошел опрос. Конечно, многим пришлось отправить ссылку лично, но обратная связь того стоила. Рад, что вы делились своим мнением и многие нашли данный опрос очень интересным! Надеюсь уже скоро получится показать результаты. Также были и такие, кто совсем никак не отреагировал, даже на личные сообщения. Что тут могу сказать, я человек простой, в этом плане. Мне

🔥1512👍10💯5😁5🗿1

25 Aug 2025, 16:06 UTC≈2,090 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Товарищи! Касается тех, кто прошел у меня когда-то все 3 этапа исследования! Для получения более достоверных сведений прошу ВАС пройти опрос! ☝🏻Еще раз повторяю, только те кто прошел 3 этапа! Опрос адаптирован для людей голосовых профессий легендарным А. Н. Коваленко! НАЖМИТЕ СЮДА ЧТОБЫ ЕГО ПРОЙТИ Те кто не прошел 3 этапа или только хотел и не приходил вообще, никуда не нажимайте, для вас будет другой опрос!! С

❤‍🔥17🙏4👌2👍2🥰2🎉1🗿1😢1

13 Jul 2025, 16:15 UTC≈1,990 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Добрый вечер, дорогие товарищи! Принимаю по фониатрии последние 4 дня. Потом долго не буду (наверное до осени), кому надо пишите сейчас @entpapa. С уважением, В. Самсонов.

🦄64😱2

6 Jun 2025, 16:51 UTC≈2,260 views38 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥23👍8🦄4💊1🖕1🗿1

14 May 2025, 12:01 UTC≈2,210 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Пока большие начальники заняты😅 Мы как «взрослые» организуем и проводим конгресс 😍 Подключайтесь на закрытие конгресса!!

12🔥6😁6🦄3👏2🖕1🗿1

14 May 2025, 09:02 UTC≈1,810 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

На меня внимания не обращайте. Надо же все-таки записать кругалек с Татьяной во время доклада))

3🦄2

14 May 2025, 09:01 UTC≈2,830 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

10🦄3🐳1

13 May 2025, 10:09 UTC≈2,010 views42 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Посмотрите и полюбуйтесь! Уже в ТРЕТИЙ раз! Конгресс ISCPP в стенах РУДН! Сейчас идут секции МК по голосу, очень интересный взгляд на голос со стороны смежных специалистов. Слушаем!

🔥20❤‍🔥11👍5🦄3🗿21

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mrdoctorlor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 891,353 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Доктор Самсонов /ФОНИАТР/ЛОР” (@mrdoctorlor), 989 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mrdoctorlor.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.