Sticker, posted without a caption

Channel
Partnership MANSI
@mppsmansi
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
28subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001854703861 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mppsmansi |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 6 June 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mppsmansi |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:36 | 28 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:17 | 27 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:09 | 27 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 6 June 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 110.2%
- avg views ÷ 28 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 30.9
- 14 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.78%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 14
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (6 June 2023 – 30 July 2026) |
| Views total | 432 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 07:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
7 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 42.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 28.6% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 28.6% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 June 2023 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
⌜ ︵︵︵ 𓆩 lׅꪮv𝗲 𓆪︵︵︵ ⌝ ‹‹ ๋ 🍓 𝕻𝐀𝐆𝐄 𝟎𝟎7 ꪮ ! ︵୨ ୧︵ ┆🗯️┆@OFCMANSI ೀ ︵︵︵ 𓆩 𝟬𝟬𝟭 𓆪︵︵︵ 𖥔₊lׅꪮv𝗲֗ ִ〇༢ : 𝐎𝐅𝐂 𝐃𝐑𝐀𝐆𝐎𝐍 𝐂𝐀𝐒𝐓𝐋𝐄 🏰 〇༢𖥔 : @OFCDRAGONCASTLE ִ〇༢𖥔 : @MPPSDRAGOSBOT ִ〇༢𖥔 : ACTIVE ︵︵︵ 𓆩 𝟬𝟬𝟮 𓆪︵︵︵ 𖥔₊lׅꪮv𝗲֗ ִ〇༢ : 𝐇𝐘𝐆𝐈𝐄𝐓𝐇𝐄𝐑𝐀 𝐇𝐎𝐒𝐏𝐈𝐓𝐀𝐋 〇༢𖥔 : @HYGIETHERAHOSPITAL ִ〇༢𖥔 : @PartnerHGHbot ִ〇༢𖥔 : ACTIVE ︵︵︵ 𓆩 𝟬𝟬𝟯 …
Sticker, posted without a caption
⌜ ︵︵︵ 𓆩 lׅꪮv𝗲 𓆪︵︵︵ ⌝ ‹‹ ๋ 🍓 𝕻𝐀𝐆𝐄 𝟎𝟎6 ꪮ ! ︵୨ ୧︵ ┆🗯️┆@OFCMANSI ೀ ︵︵︵ 𓆩 𝟬𝟬𝟭 𓆪︵︵︵ 𖥔₊lׅꪮv𝗲֗ ִ〇༢ : 𝗩𝗢𝗥𝗧𝗘𝗫𝗜𝗥 𝗡𝗘𝗫𝗨𝗦 〇༢𖥔 : @OFCVORTEXIRNEXUS ִ〇༢𖥔 : @KawanVornex_bot ִ〇༢𖥔 : ACTIVE ︵︵︵ 𓆩 𝟬𝟬𝟮 𓆪︵︵︵ 𖥔₊lׅꪮv𝗲֗ ִ〇༢ : BΣƧMËN 61 〇༢𖥔 : @OFCVARMOER ִ〇༢𖥔 : @MITRA61BOT ִ〇༢𖥔 : ACTIVE ︵︵︵ 𓆩 𝟬𝟬𝟯 𓆪︵︵︵ 𖥔₊lׅꪮv𝗲֗ ִ〇༢ : 𝗡…
Sticker, posted without a caption
⌜ ︵︵︵ 𓆩 lׅꪮv𝗲 𓆪︵︵︵ ⌝ ‹‹ ๋ 🍓 𝕻𝐀𝐆𝐄 𝟎𝟎𝟓 ꪮ ! ︵୨ ୧︵ ┆🗯️┆@OFCMANSI ೀ ︵︵︵ 𓆩 𝟬𝟬𝟭 𓆪︵︵︵ 𖥔₊lׅꪮv𝗲֗ ִ〇༢ : VEGAVERSE HOSPITAL 〇༢𖥔 : @VegaVHospitalHc ִ〇༢𖥔 : @MppsVega_bot ִ〇༢𖥔 : ACTIVE ︵︵︵ 𓆩 𝟬𝟬𝟮 𓆪︵︵︵ 𖥔₊lׅꪮv𝗲֗ ִ〇༢ : ATRAMENTUM 〇༢𖥔 : @ATRAMENTUMOFC ִ〇༢𖥔 : @MPPSATRABOT ִ〇༢𖥔 : ACTIVE ︵︵︵ 𓆩 𝟬𝟬𝟯 𓆪︵︵︵ 𖥔₊lׅꪮv𝗲֗ ִ〇༢…
❤1
Sticker, posted without a caption
⌜ ︵︵︵ 𓆩 lׅꪮv𝗲 𓆪︵︵︵ ⌝ ‹‹ ๋ 🍓 𝕻𝐀𝐆𝐄 𝟎𝟎𝟒 ꪮ ! ︵୨ ୧︵ ┆🗯️┆@OFCMANSI ೀ ︵︵︵ 𓆩 𝟬𝟬𝟭 𓆪︵︵︵ 𖥔₊lׅꪮv𝗲֗ ִ〇༢ : ARUASIH EVENT ORGANIZER 〇༢𖥔 : @ARUASIHEO ִ〇༢𖥔 : @Arseomppsbot ִ〇༢𖥔 : ACTIVE ︵︵︵ 𓆩 𝟬𝟬𝟮 𓆪︵︵︵ 𖥔₊lׅꪮv𝗲֗ ִ〇༢ : 𝐎𝐅𝐂 𝐎𝐍𝐂𝐄𝐋𝐎𝐑𝐄 〇༢𖥔 : @OFCONCELORE ִ〇༢𖥔 : @NCRMPPSBOT ִ〇༢𖥔 : ACTIVE ︵︵︵ 𓆩 𝟬𝟬𝟯 𓆪︵︵︵ 𖥔₊lׅꪮv𝗲֗ ִ〇༢ …
Sticker, posted without a caption
⌜ ︵︵︵ 𓆩 lׅꪮv𝗲 𓆪︵︵︵ ⌝ ‹‹ ๋ 🍓 𝕻𝐀𝐆𝐄 𝟎𝟎𝟑 ꪮ ! ︵୨ ୧︵ ┆🗯️┆@OFCMANSI ೀ ︵︵︵ 𓆩 𝟬𝟬𝟭 𓆪︵︵︵ 𖥔₊lׅꪮv𝗲֗ ִ〇༢ : 𝐃𝐇𝐀𝐑𝐌𝐀𝐈𝐒 𝐂𝐀𝐍𝐂𝐄𝐑 𝐇𝐎𝐒𝐏𝐈𝐓𝐀𝐋 〇༢𖥔 : @DCHOFC ִ〇༢𖥔 : @mppsdch_bot ִ〇༢𖥔 : ACTIVE SUB UNIT 01𖥔⃝₊༢ִ : 𝐃𝐑𝐀𝐂𝐎𝐓𝐈𝐆𝐄𝐑 𝐄𝐗𝐏𝐑𝐄𝐒𝐒 𖥔₊༢ִ : @DRATIGEREXPRESS 𖥔₊༢ִ : ACTIVE ︵︵︵ 𓆩 𝟬𝟬𝟮 𓆪︵︵︵ 𖥔₊lׅꪮv𝗲֗ ִ〇༢ : ˖° 𝐂𝐀𝐒𝐓𝐋𝐄𝐕𝐈𝐄𝐖 𝐇𝐎𝐒𝐏𝐈𝐓𝐀𝐋 〇༢𖥔 : @Castleviewhospita…
Sticker, posted without a caption
⌜ ︵︵︵ 𓆩 lׅꪮv𝗲 𓆪︵︵︵ ⌝ ‹‹ ๋ 🍓 𝕻𝐀𝐆𝐄 𝟎𝟎𝟐 ꪮ ! ︵୨ ୧︵ ┆🗯️┆@OFCMANSI ೀ ︵︵︵ 𓆩 𝟬𝟬𝟭 𓆪︵︵︵ 𖥔₊lׅꪮv𝗲֗ ִ〇༢ : 𝗢𝗙𝗖 𝗩𝗔𝗡𝗭𝗘𝗥𝗢 〇༢𖥔 : @OFCVANZERO ִ〇༢𖥔 : @MITRAVZJD_BOT ִ〇༢𖥔 : ACTIVE SUB UNIT 01𖥔⃝₊༢ִ : 𝗢𝗙𝗖 𝗩𝗔𝗡𝗝𝗘𝗗𝗢 𖥔₊༢ִ : @OFCVANJEDO 𖥔₊༢ִ : ACTIVE ︵︵︵ 𓆩 𝟬𝟬𝟮 𓆪︵︵︵ 𖥔₊lׅꪮv𝗲֗ ִ〇༢ : FEMALE 〇༢𖥔 : @OfficialFemale ִ〇༢𖥔 : @MPPSFemaleBot ִ〇༢𖥔 : ACTIVE …
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mppsmansi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,274,830 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@OFCMANSI · 9,7299 postsVACUM— 𝕬𝗧𝗥𝗔𝗠𝗘𝗡𝗧𝗨𝗠
@ATRAMENTUMOFC · 2,1541 post𝗔𝗨𝗥𝗘𝗙𝗟𝗔𝗠𝗘 𝗣𝗥𝗜𝗠𝗘 𝗦𝗖𝗛𝗢𝗢𝗟
@AUREFLAMESCHOOL · 5,4631 postHIRING || ˖° 𝐂𝐀𝐒𝐓𝐋𝐄𝐕𝐈𝐄𝐖 𝐇𝐎𝐒𝐏𝐈𝐓𝐀𝐋
@castleviewhospital · 8,1241 post𝐂𝐇𝐄𝐒𝐒𝐔𝐑𝐄 𝐄𝐒𝐓𝐀𝐓𝐄 𝐄𝐎
@CHESSTAEO · 3,4061 post𝐂𝐀𝐊𝐑𝐀𝐖𝐀𝐋𝐀 𝐈𝐍𝐓𝐄𝐋𝐄𝐂𝐓𝐀 𝐒𝐂𝐇𝐎𝐎𝐋
@CIS_OFC · 1,5171 post𐚟 | FEDERΛL UИITƎD MILITΛRY ⓘ ..
@FEDERALMILITARY · 2,7711 post𝐂𝐋𝐎𝐒𝐄 𝐏𝐀𝐒𝐈𝐄𝐍 | 𝐇𝐘𝐆𝐈𝐄𝐓𝐇𝐄𝐑𝐀 𝐇𝐎𝐒𝐏𝐈𝐓𝐀𝐋
@HYGIETHERAHOSPITAL · 5,4411 postOPMEMB & HIRMIN 𝐎𝐅𝐂 𝐊𝐀𝐈𝐎𝐄𝐍𝐈𝐗
@KAIOENIX · 4,3961 post☩ ⋮ 𝐋𝐄𝐓𝐔𝐌 𝐒𝐀𝐍𝐂𝐓𝐔𝐌 𝐒𝐂𝐇𝐎𝐎𝐋
@LETUMSANCTUMSCHOOL · 4,0471 postOPLINK - 𝗢𝗙𝗖 𝗗𝗜𝗦𝗩𝗘𝗡𝗨𝗘
@OFCDISVENUE · 16,2831 post[HIATUS] 𝗘𝗡-𝗙𝗢𝗥𝗖𝗘𝗥 '⅋─𝗡Ξ𝗪 𝝨𝗥Λ
@OFCENFORCER · 21,5241 post𝐎𝐅𝐂 𝐊𝐘Ū𝐙𝐓𝐋𝐄 — 九尾の城
@OFCKYUZTLE · 7,0211 postOFC MOLOGY CULTÉ
@ofcmologyculte · 7,0091 post𝗢𝗙𝗖 𝗣𝗛𝗔𝗡𝗧𝗢𝗠 𝗥𝗘𝗚𝗜𝗠𝗘𝗡𝗧
@OFCPHANTOMREGIMENT · 5,0491 post𝗢𝗙𝗙𝗜𝗖𝗜𝗔𝗟 𝗥𝗢𝗦𝗜𝗗𝗘
@OFCROSIDE · 6,2771 post𝗥𝗨𝗕𝗥𝗜𝗫
@OFCRUBRIX · 24,5811 post𝗢𝗙𝗖 𝗩𝗔𝗡𝗝𝗘𝗗𝗢.
@OFCVANJEDO · 5,9561 post𝗢𝗙𝗖 𝗩𝗔𝗡𝗭𝗘𝗥𝗢
@OFCVANZERO · 8,3151 post𝗢𝗙𝗖 𝗪𝗘𝗦𝗧𝗔𝗟𝗜𝗦
@OFCWESTALIS · 2,4161 post光狼. KŌUGARŌ
@OFFICIALKOUGARO · 6,1361 post𝗩𝗔𝗞𝗨𝗠 // 𝐒𝐇𝐀𝐑𝐊𝐒 𝐊𝐈𝐋𝐋𝐄𝐑
@SHARKSKILLER · 17,0451 post‘⅋─𝗩𝗘𝗥𝗗𝗔̈𝗡𝗧;( ’𝗙𝗜𝗘𝗟𝗗𝗦. )
@VerdantFields · 9,5281 postBUBAR – 🛹🗯 WΣƧƬSƗĐɆ ØVΞЯĐƦƗVΣ
@WSDRIVE · 4,4961 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@mppsmansi named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Partnership MANSI” (@mppsmansi), 28 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mppsmansi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.