Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Мама, можно?

@mozhnooli

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

249subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001486200074
TypeChannel
Username@mozhnooli
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mozhnooli

Growth

2472492488 Aug 2026, 10:01 — 247 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 02:36 — 249 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 10:019 Aug 2026, 02:36
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 247–249 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 02:36249+2
8 Aug 2026, 10:01247first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 14 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.7%
avg views ÷ 249 subscribers
Avg views / post
74.0
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held18 (14 May 20265 August 2026)
Views total222
Reactions total17
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

131 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 547210980052122031610378.6%
🙏86.11%
custom 547195341646700659153.82%
👍53.82%
🕊43.05%
🦄43.05%
🤩21.53%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 131reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 18 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mozhnooli. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 May 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 13:35 UTC42 views6 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Почему бывает так тяжело о себе заботиться (особенно при комплексной травме) Бывает так, что человек прекрасно знает, что ему нужно поесть, лечь спать, принять лекарство, отменить лишнюю встречу или перестать читать новости в два часа ночи. Он может даже подробно и рационально объяснить, почему это важно. Но между «я понимаю» и «я делаю» как будто несколько километров ползком по засасыващему болоту. И почему-то окру

custom 54721098005212203166

19 Jul 2026, 13:10 UTC91 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @bodyneutralzonePhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 547210980052122031611

19 Jul 2026, 13:10 UTC89 viewsread 8 August 2026

Сегодня картинка вместо сложного текста, gentle reminder ✨

24 Jun 2026, 09:33 UTC159 views8 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Если заметить идеализацию и не испугаться ее немножечко поисследовать, можно спросить себя: • Что я боюсь увидеть, если этот человек окажется просто человеком? • Что будет с нашей связью, если я разозлюсь? • Можно ли уже оставаться в контакте не только через восхищение, но и через несогласие? • Что для меня значит любить и восхищаться человеком именно за эти качества? Что мне дают эти отношения в таком виде как сейча

custom 54719534164670065915🙏3

24 Jun 2026, 09:33 UTC109 views10 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Идеализация — это клей Звучит, конечно, не очень романтично, потому что мы привыкли думать об идеализации как о чём-то возвышенном и прекрасном: «он особенный», «она меня спасла», «не место, а мечта», «мой психолог - самый лучший». И тут вдруг "клей". Но если посмотреть внимательнее, клей соединяет то, что само пока не держится, и идеализация часто делает ровно это: помогает нам входить в отношения и удерживаться в

custom 54721098005212203167🙏3

22 Jun 2026, 12:32 UTC99 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Мы почему-то привыкли считать травму индивидуальной проблемой, хотя она часто является следствием нашего провала как общества. Несмотря на то, что в последнее время стрелочка постепенно поворачивается в профессиональной среде в сторону коллективной ответственности, тем не менее разговоры о травме на мой взгляд все еще слишком сосредоточены на том, как исправить пострадавшего человека. Научиться выбирать других парт

custom 547210980052122031618🕊4

22 Jun 2026, 11:20 UTC90 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Меня поражает низкая активность на новых форматах, даже не знаю что и думать, на самомо деле. Неужели вам нравятся больше мои абстрактные лонгриды? Вы удивительные 😊😊😊

custom 54721098005212203169

19 Jun 2026, 10:55 UTC121 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 54721098005212203166

19 Jun 2026, 10:55 UTC133 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

3️⃣ сериала которые помогут сэкономить на психотерапии, если вам когда-нибудь казалось, что с вами слишком сложно быть рядом Мне на самом деле очень нравится, что сейчас стали снимать сериалы не про героев которых из-за их отличий никто не принимает, и они вынуждены страдать, не в состоянии это изменить, ну, условно, как доктор Хаус. А про людей, которым не обязательно довести себя до идеала, чтобы получить принятие

custom 54721098005212203164👍1

17 Jun 2026, 18:19 UTC123 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

🦄4custom 54721098005212203164👍1

17 Jun 2026, 18:19 UTC130 viewsread 8 August 2026

Записала миниподкаст про самокритику Тестирую формат: знаю, что мы тут все привыкли больше к текстам, так что буду рада обратной связи - если вдруг такое нужно и вам удобнее слушать, чем читать, накидайте стикеров в комментарии 🫶

7 Jun 2026, 14:18 UTC197 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Если вы часто думаете «наверное у меня СДВГ, это бы всё объяснило», эта мысль уже работает на вас. В рамках функционального анализа поведения (а мысли - это кстати наше внутреннее поведение) нам важно обращать внимание не только на то, подтвердится диагноз у психиатра или нет, а вообще на функцию этой мысли «наверное, у меня СДВГ/БАР/ПРЛ/подставьте свое». Что эта мысль делает для человека? Описание диагноза, котор

custom 54721098005212203169👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @mozhnooli. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,156,494 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мама, можно?” (@mozhnooli), 249 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mozhnooli.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.