Channel
@mowj_app
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
658subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001921828957 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mowj_app |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mowj_app |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 06:35 | 658 | -7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:40 | 665 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:01 | 665 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (26 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 685 |
| Reactions total | 22 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 16:40 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
22 reactions across 14 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 86.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 19 | 86.4% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 9.09% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 4.55% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📣همراهان عزیز موج، این پنجشنبه، به خاطر شرکت میزبانها و سفیران محله در پیاده روی ایام اربعین حسینی، توزیع نداشتیم. اما میدونیم که سفرههای پر برکت شما مثل همیشه با نیت های قشنگتون به راه بوده. ▪️اگه دوست داشتین، از لحظههای پخت و پخش نذریهاتون، یا قصهی نیت دلهاتون، برای ما عکس و دل نوشته بفرستین؛ تا با هم، این عطر و حال خوب رو به اشتراک بگذاریم. ✨ حاجاتتون روا، نذریهاتون قبول🙏 🆔 @mowj_add
حالا جذابیتش به اینه که پای قرار موندن تو موج، فقط یه شکل نداره: ▪️گاهی با پختن یه غذای اضافه، میزبان یه سفره میشی. ▪️گاهی با سفیر شدن، کمک میکنی مهمونا شناسایی بشن و این غذا به دست مهمانان موج برسه. ▪️گاهی با تأمین هزینه یک یا چند غذا، سهمت رو از این قرار هفتگی حفظ میکنی. 🔔این هفته اما یکی از سادهترین راههای همراهی با قرار هفتگی موج در حال اجراست: 👈شما هر مبلغی که در توانت هست رو واریز میکنی و موج از طرف تو…
❤1
قرار هر پنجشنبه موج، یکی از همین قراراست: ▪️قرار نیست هر هفته شرایطمون عالی باشه. ▪️قرار نیست همیشه وقت و انرژی اضافه داشته باشیم. اما قراره راهی پیدا کنیم که پای این قرار بمونیم. 📌یه حرکت کوچک، اما مداوم که اثرش دیده میشه
❤1
فکر کن امروز صبح، همهی ما با این حس از خواب بیدار میشدیم که: «امروز مسئولیتش با من نیست... یکی دیگه انجامش میده.» چه اتفاقی میافتاد؟🤔
❤1
دقت کنیم میبینیم که خیلی از کارهامون هم، نه به خاطر اینکه سختن، چون به اونها متعهد نمیمونیم، کمکم از زندگیمون حذف شدن.... برای ساختن یه چیز لازمه: اینکه خودمون رو هر جور شده پای یه قرار نگه داریم. نه فقط تو روزایی که انگیزه داریم یا وقتهایی که شرایط مهیاست... 🔔 گاهی لازمه خودمون رو هر جور شده پای یه روتین خوب نگه داریم، حتی وقتی حس و حال و وقتش رو نداریم. اثر واقعی، از استمرار میاد؛ نه از یه تصمیم لحظهای …
❤2
این روزها که دلهای همه با زائران در مسیر پر نور اربعینه، به چشم میبینیم که... هر خدمت کوچیک و هر قدم ساده حتماً روزی، بخشی از یه دریـــــــــای بیکران و اثربخش میشه... 🏴فرارسیدن اربعین حسینی رو تسلیت عرض میکنیم، اگه زائر بودید و هستید زیارت قبول و التماس دعا 🙏
👌2
توی پویش های موج، ما هدف بزرگمون رو خرد کردیم تا برای همه ما ممکن بشه: ۱. تمرین هفتگی داریم: چون میدونیم استمرار مهمترین تکنیکشه. ما برای مهربونی هر هفته یه قرار میذاریم تا یادمون بمونه. 📅 ۲. حتی یه پرس غذا مهمه : اینجا هیچ فرقی بین یه لقمه نون و پنیر با یه پرس چلوکباب نیست. هر پرس غذا ارزشمنده، محبت خونوادههای موج توشه و با زحمت و عشق توی خونههامون آماده میشه.
تا حالا شده حس کنید هر چیزی توی دنیای اطرافتون تلاش میکنه توجهتون رو بدزده؟ فرانچسکو چیریلو هم همین حس رو داشت! 👀 اون برای اینکه بتونه روی کارش عمیق بشه یا استفاده از یه تایمر گوجهای، تکنیکی رو ابداع کرد که دنیا رو تکون داد: ۲۵ دقیقه تمرکز کامل و ۵ دقیقه استراحت. اسمشم به یاد زمانسنجش گذاشت پومودورو که یعنی گوجهفرنگی. 🍅 راز موفقیت این روش، «خرد کردن کارهای بزرگه». مثلا وقتی یه کتاب قطور رو به بخشهای کوچیک تقس…
شما هم مثل من، تجربه شروع کردن یه کار و از وسطش رها کردن رو دارین؟
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
ما معمولا برای انجام کارهای خوب، منتظر یه فرصت ویژه میمونیم؛ در حالی که بیشتر وقتها، فقط به یه تصمیم ساده نیاز داریم. پویش «یک تیر و دو نشان» همون تصمیم ساده است؛ یه مشارکت، با دو اثر موندگار. 🎯 تو پویش یک تیر و دو نشان داستان اینه که، کمکهای شما صرف تهیه غذا از آشپزخانههای مردمی میشه که سود حاصل از درآمدشون رو صرف انجام کارهای خیر میکنن. این هفته مبلغ شما میتونه همزمان هم صرف تهیه غذا برای نیازمندان و هم بر پا…
❤2
این هفته یه فرصت خیلی خاص داریم تا خیلی راحت، هم سفره یه خانواده نیازمند رو گرم کنیم و همزمان، سهمی داشته باشیم تو پذیرایی از زائرای اربعین تو کربلا. ✨ با هر میزان کمک، شما در واقع دو تا کار خیر بزرگ انجام دادین:🎯 ▪️ غذای گرم میرسه به سفره خانوادههای نیازمند. ▪️ کمک میکنید تا موکبهای زائرای اربعین تو کربلا برپا بشه. داستان اینه که: تو پویش «یک تیر و دو نشان»، کمکهای شما صرف تهیه غذا از آشپزخانههای مردمی …
❤1
همه ما یه لیست بلندبالا از بایدها تو سرمون داریم... باید بیشتر ورزش کنم... باید کمتر قضاوت کنم... باید بیشتر کنار خانواده باشم... باید به بقیه کمک کنم... ولی حقیقت اینه که زندگی ما رو دانستههامون نمیسازه؛ بلکه عادتهامون میسازنش. شاید حکمت، دقیقاً همون فاصله کوچیکی باشه که بین میدونم و انجام میدم هست. همون پلی که اگه ازش رد نشیم، هر چقدر بریم باز هم همون جای اولیم. امروز چهارشنبهس😅 به جای گفتن از شنبه امر…
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mowj_app. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
شما هم مثل من، تجربه شروع کردن یه کار و از وسطش رها کردن رو دارین؟
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
به نظرت کدومش خطرناک تره؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
تا حالا پیش اومده یه تبلیغ ببینی و جذبش شی، یا یه تعریف ساده از یه دوست، اثرش بیشتر بوده؟
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 194,144 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“حرکت مردمی موج 🌊” (@mowj_app), 658 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mowj_app.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.