Channel
@mowdotfm
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry
122subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001491041189 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mowdotfm |
| Description | City culture service Moscow → World https://mow.fm |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mowdotfm |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:17 | 122 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:49 | 122 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
316 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5228702325840838552 | 65 | 20.6% | |
| custom 5217845065128371254 | 64 | 20.3% | |
| custom 5228804180990263748 | 51 | 16.1% | |
| custom 5420456676983587239 | 43 | 13.6% | |
| custom 5244460406231020723 | 38 | 12.0% | |
| custom 5229190350089781561 | 28 | 8.86% | |
| custom 5228736062808948157 | 24 | 7.59% | |
| custom 5229133450363044369 | 3 | 0.949% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 316reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 December 2025 to 6 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mowdotfm. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 December 2025 to 6 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Choose your fighters
The shares total 139%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
custom 52288041809902637487
Всех гастролёров с ART&BASS EXHIBITION слушаем на SoundCloud: British Handsome b2b SM Rivers: → Слушать Kajdomu Svoe: → Слушать Malazoniya b2b Zakat 512: → Слушать Bokariush b2b Steppa: → Слушать SCRATCHDILLA b2b Zasada: → Слушать SB ODD b2b MIRRVGE: → Слушать Ig // YouTube // SoundCloud // Чат
custom 52287023258408385525custom 52288041809902637484custom 52178450651283712542
Это не диджей-сет, а сборник бэнгеров 🔫 SB ODD b2b MIRRVGE → Смотри на YouTube по ссылке. Ig // YouTube // SoundCloud // Чат
custom 521784506512837125411custom 52444604062310207235custom 54204566769835872394
Братья по низким частотам 🫂 SCRATCHDILLA b2b Zasada → Смотри на YouTube по ссылке. Ig // YouTube // SoundCloud // Чат
custom 54204566769835872397custom 52444604062310207233custom 52287023258408385522custom 52288041809902637482
Кто соединяет Восточное побережье🇺🇸, Лондон🇬🇧 и Москву🇷🇺 ? Bokariush b2b Steppa → Смотри на YouTube по ссылке. Ig // YouTube // SoundCloud // Чат
custom 52178450651283712545custom 54204566769835872394custom 52444604062310207232
Trappin’ & Dubsteppin’. Malazoniya b2b Zakat 512 → Смотри на YouTube по ссылке. Ig // YouTube // SoundCloud // Чат
custom 52287023258408385526custom 52178450651283712545custom 52287360628089481573custom 52288041809902637481custom 52291903500897815611
Грязновато и басисто. Kajdomu Svoe → Смотри на YouTube по ссылке. Ig // YouTube // SoundCloud // Чат
custom 52444604062310207237custom 54204566769835872395custom 52291903500897815614custom 52178450651283712543
Самый высокоэнергичный дуэт. British Handsome b2b SM Rivers → Смотри на YouTube по ссылке. Ig // YouTube // SoundCloud // Чат
custom 52178450651283712549custom 52287023258408385526custom 52287360628089481575custom 54204566769835872392custom 52444604062310207231
У нас было всё, но не было связи (привет глушилкам). Поэтому, к сожалению, столкнулись с проблемами с оплатами и не смогли обработать порядка 40 заявок на инвайты, которые поступали перед самой вечеринкой — увидели их уже по окончании мероприятия 😞
custom 52287360628089481578custom 52291334503630443693custom 52291903500897815613
Хайлайты прошедшей ART&BASS EXHIBITION уже в нашей инсте.
custom 52291903500897815615custom 52288041809902637484custom 52444604062310207234custom 52287023258408385523
Интернет вернулся в Москву. Как дела?
custom 522880418099026374811custom 52291903500897815617custom 52287023258408385523
Начали раскидывать инвайты в боте → @mowmarketbot. Проверяй!👹
custom 52287360628089481577custom 52287023258408385525custom 52288041809902637484
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mowdotfm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Choose your fighters
The shares total 139%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 December 2025 to 6 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 468,511 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
One URL this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association— we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MOW” (@mowdotfm), 122 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mowdotfm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.