Channel
@mountmasha
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
156subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002083860916 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mountmasha |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mountmasha |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:35 | 156 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:45 | 155 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:53 | 155 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 18 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
84 reactions across 7 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 25 | 29.8% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 13.1% | |
| 👀 | 8 | 9.52% | |
| 💯 | 7 | 8.33% | |
| 😢 | 6 | 7.14% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 4.76% | |
| ☃ | 3 | 3.57% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 3.57% | |
| 🦄 | 3 | 3.57% | |
| custom 5197513299834459752 | 2 | 2.38% | |
| 👨💻 | 2 | 2.38% | |
| 💅 | 2 | 2.38% | |
| 😈 | 2 | 2.38% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 2.38% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 1.19% | |
| 🌭 | 1 | 1.19% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 1.19% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 1.19% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 84reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 18 March 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
В этой чудесной истории про самолет — вспоминать её уже на грани актуальности — есть еще такой жизнеобразующий момент. Когда я только вышла из автобуса в аэропорту, я записала задорное голосовое. Дескать, можно же щас вообще выйти из парадигмы страха и преодоления. Не «боюсь и не делаю» и «боюсь, но делаю». Есть же и другие варианты — любопытство (было), удовольствие (тоже было). Если без восторженности, пусть буд…
❤6🔥2👍1🤔1
Unexpected flight и ДАРЫ ВОЛХВОВ (LIVE) О, я вам сейчас расскажу, как можно проезжать мимо аэропорта, купить билет и улететь. Смотрите, это прям большой рассказ. И если вы так сильно не боялись летать, вам нужно будет подставить что-то свое Мутная история с самолетом началась, когда прошло уже дней шесть моего пути в каком-то сладком дурмане, знаках. Везде сдают нужные мне билеты, в одном поезде сосед — первый быв…
🔥8❤4👀3
🔽
❤5
РБ виси (про кино без попкорна и трейлеров) Это типа ресурный подход, написала Витебск-обзор в моменте (в Витебске) часа за два (не больше), ну и полчаса на перечитывания — но когда наблюдения реальны и тебе есть что сказать, так быстро и должно получаться ) + время Стаса на обложку 🥔🐤 про неизбежно вдумчивый поход в кино про дизайн-код туалетов про систему скидок в отеле (система «тянем до последнего» ) https:/…
👀5🦄3💅2❤1
Желтые волосы (и лучше думать, что умрешь) Когда же еще должны обрушиться все эти чувства, кроме как когда ты на высоком этаже отеля (дождь летит над городом и над далями) в шелковых трусах (ладно, лонгслив с Флинстоунами тоже имеется) и случайно открыл док трехлетней давности (ноут завис, от злости кликала на всё подряд в закладках), а там черточки-овечки на склонах и такое поэтическое состояние (если слово “поэти…
❤6💯3😈2custom 51975132998344597522⚡1🔥1🤝1
Почему такие описания в книжках норм, а в постах не норм Полезная статья про эмоции в контент-маркетинге ) Сразу могу вам основную мысль спойлернуть — если идете в эмоции, сверяйтесь, это реалистично вообще, чувствовать такие вещи, которые вы описываете? Вы сами это чувствуете? Я тут смотрю СДВГ-пересказы сумерек, и услышала лучшую шутку по всей саге эвер — Белла приезжает в Сиэтл за доками, и чел-юрист выражает о…
😁4☃3❤3🎉3
Работа за еду за стол Вот это отлично отражает всю нашу природу "привычного дискомфорта". 🍄 Смотрите, я реально люблю писать и редачить. Типа, мне это прям приятно: выстраивать текст, чистить, как задачки решать (я с физмата, не с филфака!)) Даже SEO-статьи, если не идти в страдания, типа "годы идут, а SEO-статьи остаются" — и в тех можно найти удовольствие, легкость и иронию. Часто думаю, что же мне не дает спок…
😢6💯4👨💻2🌭1🤝1
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @mountmasha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 866,507 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Маша на горе🏔” (@mountmasha), 156 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mountmasha.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.