А вот и Ярослав, который проехал, на минуточку, целых 90 км⚡️ Мы гордимся тобой, @swyatoslavsky С нетерпением ждем результатов Артема!
❤6

Channel
@motoricans
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
4,176subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001457033678 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @motoricans |
| Created | 13 May 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/motoricans |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:13 | 4,176 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:53 | 4,178 | -10 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:36 | 4,188 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:41 | 4,188 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (16 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 9,653 |
| Reactions total | 242 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 12:14 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
242 reactions across 16 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 75 | 31.0% | |
| ❤ | 69 | 28.5% | |
| 👍 | 53 | 21.9% | |
| 👏 | 19 | 7.85% | |
| custom 5433805508353996553 | 10 | 4.13% | |
| custom 5217824874487101321 | 8 | 3.31% | |
| ⚡ | 6 | 2.48% | |
| custom 5226609177824096246 | 1 | 0.413% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 0.413% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 242reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
А вот и Ярослав, который проехал, на минуточку, целых 90 км⚡️ Мы гордимся тобой, @swyatoslavsky С нетерпением ждем результатов Артема!
❤6
Video message, posted without a caption
❤3
Фидбэк от нашего первого спортсмена! Сергей уже проплыл свои 1,9 км из 113 и успешно передал эстафету Ярославу. Вперед, Моторика 🔥
❤7👏3
Video message, posted without a caption
❤4👍3🔥2🍾1
Команда «Моторики» впервые преодолевает сложную дистанцию🔥 8 августа на соревнованиях «ЛИГА ТРИАТЛОНА & IRONSTAR МОСКВА 113 2026» наша компания представит своих спортсменов. Дистанция 113 включает в себя плавание 1,9 км, велогонку 90 км и бег 21,1 км. На каждом этапе будет преодолевать себя настоящий Моториканец! 💪 В составе сборной: ✨Плавание - Сергей Куценко; ✨Велоэтап - Ярослав Святославский; ✨Бег - Артём Пути…
❤11🔥2👏1
Чем выше инвазия — тем выше риски? Где заканчивается человек и начинаются технологии? Является ли технология частью человека или просто сторонним устройством? Об этом и многом другом расскажет на IT-Пикнике руководитель департамента инноваций ГК «Моторика» Юрий Матвиенко. Ⓜ️ На реальных кейсах из мировой практики Юрий покажет: ⭕кибербезопасность медицинских устройств — это вопрос жизни и смерти, а не только техноло…
❤9👍4🔥4
📍 Уже сегодня в 16:00 мск! Как создаются современные бионические протезы? Что уже умеют российские технологии, а что пока остается задачей будущего? Об этом поговорим на открытом вебинаре «О технологиях, меняющих жизнь, глазами инженеров». Вместе с инженером и нашим подписчиком Виталием Глазуновым, а также разработчиками и руководителями ГК «Моторика»: ⭕️ Алексей Ахметшин — руководитель «Моторика НЕМО» ⭕️ Кира Хло…
🔥8❤4custom 54338055083539965534
Ⓜ️ Сделано в России: инженерный взгляд на развитие протезирования Этот вебинар появился благодаря нашему подписчику Виталию Глазунову. Он прислал нам список вопросов о протезировании — не общих, а с инженерной точки зрения. Мы решили не отвечать в комментариях, а собрать разработчиков и руководителей ГК «Моторика» и обсудить всё в прямом эфире. На вебинаре поговорим: ⭕️ Что уже умеют современные бионические протез…
👍10🔥7👏5❤2
🔥 Группа «Моторика» заняла 2⃣ место на международном конкурсе дизайна адаптивной одежды «На крыльях»! В Выборге завершился региональный этап конкурса дизайна адаптивной одежды «На крыльях», и мы рады поделиться отличной новостью: Группа «Моторика» стала серебряным призером в номинации «Повседневный комфорт»🥈 Мы убеждены, что комфорт складывается из деталей. Именно поэтому мы создаем решения, которые учитывают реаль…
🔥17custom 52178248744871013216custom 54338055083539965536
Ⓜ️ Уже сегодня! Вебинар «Карьера в протезировании и ассистивных технологиях». Как прийти на работу в сферу, где технологии меняют жизни людей? Разберем сегодня. 📍 30 июля, в 16:00 (МСК). Поговорим: ⭕️ какие профессии уже востребованы в ассистивных технологиях и какие появятся в ближайшие годы; ⭕️ как составить резюме, которое заметят; ⭕️ как выстраивать работу в команде разных поколений. Спикеры — эксперты ГК «…
👍11🔥5❤3⚡2custom 52178248744871013211custom 52266091778240962461
Первый протез — новые горизонты! Встречайте Абдурахманова Шамшода и его первый бионический протез от «Моторики». ⭕️«Я по-другому себя ощущаю!» — с такими словами Шамшод делится своими первыми впечатлениями. Раньше он никогда не показывал свою руку, а теперь... теперь он может свободно делать любые жесты. Это невероятное чувство свободы и уверенности, которое возвращают наши технологии. ⭕️ Отдельный пункт — выбор д…
🔥10👏3⚡1👍1custom 52178248744871013211
❓«Зачем тяговый протез, если есть бионический?» — этот вопрос мы слышим чаще всего. ⭕️В новом видео отвечает Максим Помятихин. Он не инженер и не врач, он — пользователь протеза. Объясняет просто и честно: кому подходит тяга, почему она не устарела и в каких случаях остаётся лучшим решением. 📢 Смотрим рилс. А если вам интересна не только технология, но и карьера в протезировании, в первом комментарии — ссылка на в…
👍11🔥5👏4
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @motoricans. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@motoricans edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 68,206 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Моториканцы” (@motoricans), 4,176 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/motoricans.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.