Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
4 measurements spanning 17 days, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 718–731 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Sept 2026, 19:20
728
-1
3 Sept 2026, 09:37
729
+10
25 Aug 2026, 23:15
719
no change
25 Aug 2026, 23:00
719
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 24 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
37.8%
avg views ÷ 728 subscribers
Avg views / post
275
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
16.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026
Posts held
18 (24 August 2026 – 25 August 2026)
Views total
4,676
Reactions total
750
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
25 Aug 2026, 23:15 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4m 19s
Average length
1m 05s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
750 reactions across 17 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 7.60% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5323298851686208823
57
7.60%
custom 5292029363762516368
53
7.07%
custom 5314552558809795659
45
6.00%
custom 5362032898281072743
44
5.87%
custom 5192916039855264626
40
5.33%
custom 5194942079008002366
37
4.93%
custom 5193112298385855821
34
4.53%
custom 5312152994941257987
32
4.27%
custom 5193018071098348179
29
3.87%
custom 5195140502202111420
29
3.87%
custom 5445180321215568412
29
3.87%
custom 5192787044807494366
27
3.60%
custom 5220034454772271066
26
3.47%
custom 5195154048528959726
25
3.33%
custom 5195347300582445287
25
3.33%
custom 5194957863012813621
24
3.20%
custom 5195270613941373696
24
3.20%
custom 5215218645382221137
23
3.07%
custom 5233595363037828478
23
3.07%
custom 5314343844874049964
22
2.93%
7 further kinds
102
13.6%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 750 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 24 August 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ЧЕЛЕНДЖ ПЛАНКА | СЕНТЯБРЬ
с 1 по 28 сентября 🚘
можно присоединиться к автопарку лены детки в новый месяц:
зарегаться можно до 30 августа (включительно), с 31 августа стикерочки уже не присылайте 🩷
оставляйте свой любимый стикер в комментариях к посту, я пришлю вам правила и информацию о челендже
это постановка 2021 года, возрожденная спустя 5 лет с легкими нотками преобразования, поставленная за два занятия 😂
choreography: @elena__detka
music edit: @nastoburskiy
camera: @alenka.video
video edit: @asedasaturov
place: @prodvizhenie.dancekmv
что конкретно сегодня работает в отказе «мужчинам»:
• здравствуйте, нет, я не знакомлюсь: ❌
• здравствуйте, нет, я замужем: ❌
• здравствуйте, нет, мне не интересно: ❌
• идите на хуй, и самой быть посланной на хуй: ✅
где я сегодня свернула не туда?
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @mothereelenadetka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Леночка Деточка” (@mothereelenadetka), 728 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mothereelenadetka.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.