Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Moth cosplays

@moth_cosplays

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

340subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002102573501
TypeChannel
Username@moth_cosplays
DescriptionМоль косплеит здесь и тут https://vk.com/moth_cosplays
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/moth_cosplays

Growth

3406 Aug 2026, 21:18 — 340 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 21:33 — 340 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 21:186 Aug 2026, 21:33
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 339–341 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 21:33340no change
6 Aug 2026, 21:18340first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
63.3%
avg views ÷ 340 subscribers
Avg views / post
215
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
19.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held10 (20 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total2,153
Reactions total422
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 21:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
782
Videos
11
Links
225

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

422 reactions across 10 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥8720.6%
custom 54450300360149030017517.8%
4711.1%
custom 54001222702847859554510.7%
custom 52176847339992025384410.4%
custom 5373311405090938996286.64%
🔥143.32%
custom 5472164874886846699133.08%
😁133.08%
custom 5197250739893708508112.61%
💘102.37%
🙏102.37%
👀71.66%
🥰71.66%
custom 519994601655554342161.42%
🫡20.474%
🏆10.237%
👏10.237%
😍10.237%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 422reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 18:26 UTC132 views36 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 544503003601490300114❤‍🔥7👀7custom 52176847339992025385custom 54721648748868466992custom 51972507398937085081

4 Aug 2026, 13:41 UTC112 views30 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Posted without readable text

❤‍🔥14custom 53733114050909389968custom 54450300360149030016🙏1custom 51972507398937085081

4 Aug 2026, 10:08 UTC121 views35 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Posted without readable text

❤‍🔥14🙏8🥰6custom 51999460165555434213custom 544503003601490300131

4 Aug 2026, 06:42 UTC121 views35 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 540012227028478595518custom 53733114050909389968custom 52176847339992025385🫡2custom 51999460165555434212

31 Jul 2026, 06:42 UTC277 views48 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🥂 Поздравляю нас с выходом праздничного патча в ZZZ! Только сейчас смогла добраться до обновления игры и теперь планирую все выходные залипать в новый контент! Есть идеи, кого заберу в качестве бесплатного S-агента? 😏 А как ваши успехи? Хвастайтесь своими итогами года и крутками в ZZZ и не только! 🔥 💬 Фото Gentleman_Cat💬 #косплей #игры #ЗЗЗ #АстраЯо #ZZZ #AstraYao

custom 54450300360149030012113❤‍🔥9💘2🔥1🥰1custom 54001222702847859551

30 Jul 2026, 19:22 UTC176 views35 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @st_grassVideo

🙂 Вечер глупи видосов. 😂 Когда я наткнулась на этот звук я осознала, что он идеальный для наших бэков. 😂 #грасс_бэки #грасс_тикитоки

15😁13custom 52176847339992025384🏆1👏1custom 51999460165555434211

28 Jul 2026, 06:44 UTC306 views55 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

😊😊😊😊😊😊 😊😊😊😊😊😊😊 💀 На выходных снималась программа сдохни или умри! 😵 Вся Вселенная была настроена против нас и этого фотоса, но мы оказались слишком тупыми, чтобы считывать её знаки! Сняли похоронный Амфореус вопреки всему.✌️ Когда Пичи предложила поехать сниматься куда-то под Тулу я не думала, что это место будет настолько глубоко под Тулой. Вот небольшой чек-лист наших приключений: 😊 ехали толпой на элке с огр

custom 540012227028478595522custom 544503003601490300113custom 53733114050909389969❤‍🔥6custom 521768473399920253821🔥1custom 51972507398937085081

26 Jul 2026, 11:35 UTC235 views48 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

💡 Моль получила свет! 💡 Немного всратых беков со вчерашней съёмки ПОД ТУЛОЙ! #бэки

custom 521768473399920253825❤‍🔥11custom 51972507398937085088🔥2🙏1custom 54450300360149030011

21 Jul 2026, 06:42 UTC318 views37 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🌼Пока я дописываю статью про вот этот парик, принесла свое баловство для следующего проекта по Хоёверс (помогите, оно меня не отпускает). 🌼Это пока тестовые образцы: экспериментировала со способами нанесения краски, толщиной линий и размерами самих бутонов. Заодно примерила этот цветочный ободок на (тоже ещё процессный) паричок. Отгадаете девочку? 🌷 #процесс

17custom 544503003601490300111💘8🔥1

20 Jul 2026, 06:44 UTC355 views63 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🦋 🌸🌸🌸🌸 🦋 Мне снился такой прекрасный сон... Будто я оказалась в волшебной деревушке, где всё было из бумаги! И деревья, и животные! Малыши-зверьки попросили раскрасить их мир яркими красками, и я... Ой! Падисара, это ты? Так это был не сон? Порой сны оказываются настолько чудесными, что не хочется просыпаться. Вот бы уснуть и путешествовать в сновиденческом мире осознанно или вообще остаться там навсегда, согласись?

❤‍🔥26custom 547216487488684669911🔥9custom 54450300360149030016custom 54001222702847859554custom 52176847339992025383custom 53733114050909389963😍1

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @moth_cosplays. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 707,119 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Moth cosplays” (@moth_cosplays), 340 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/moth_cosplays.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.