Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

mostcartoon

@mostcartoon

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

432subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002045358732
TypeChannel
Username@mostcartoon
Descriptioncontact: @pexdes
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/mostcartoon

Growth

4324344337 Aug 2026, 18:53 — 434 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 04:34 — 432 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 05:18 — 432 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 18:538 Aug 2026, 05:18
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 432–434 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 05:18432no change
8 Aug 2026, 04:34432-2
7 Aug 2026, 18:53434first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 28 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
54.7%
avg views ÷ 432 subscribers
Avg views / post
237
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
15.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held18 (28 June 20263 August 2026)
Views total473
Reactions total72
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 05:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
182
Videos
23
Links
68

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

872 reactions across 18 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
50157.5%
custom 52289442012190628248810.1%
custom 5251705371814287405768.72%
custom 5316831889363856683576.54%
custom 5328171071176713918343.90%
custom 5330356071364046086313.56%
🍓242.75%
custom 5469744063815102906222.52%
custom 5316964505069055314182.06%
custom 531440465302103095391.03%
custom 535254906073567429250.573%
custom 525400069253158179230.344%
custom 530335314382267503520.229%
custom 543817703773701074920.229%

Custom emoji. 12 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 872reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
110
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 18 we hold a reading for · 61%
Most on one post
50
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mostcartoon. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 June 2026 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 18:59 UTC136 views35 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

yes i like being treated like a cat ok?

21🍓6custom 53281710711767139184custom 53033531438226750352custom 52517053718142874051custom 52540006925315817921

18 Jul 2026, 17:47 UTC337 views37 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @cartoonmostPhoto

🎁Чиби формы 1000₽ -Фон,обработка входит в стоимость

custom 5228944201219062824226🍓4custom 53525490607356742922custom 52517053718142874051custom 53168318893638566831custom 53281710711767139181

14 Jul 2026, 20:08 UTC386 views52 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🎁Го 30 реакций и будет новый артик

custom 531683188936385668337custom 52289442012190628245custom 53303560713640460864🍓2custom 52517053718142874052custom 52540006925315817921custom 53281710711767139181

13 Jul 2026, 13:13 UTC404 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🔮Заходи в чатик художников https://t.me/+j76WWAp5kPJkNWJi

11🍓2custom 52289442012190628241custom 52517053718142874051custom 52540006925315817921custom 53281710711767139181

12 Jul 2026, 08:17 UTC428 views29 reactions10 Starsread 8 August 2026

Posted without readable text

18🍓3custom 53303560713640460863custom 53525490607356742922custom 52289442012190628241custom 52517053718142874051custom 53168318893638566831

11 Jul 2026, 09:36 UTC431 views60 reactionsread 8 August 2026

💀50 реакций и будет взрослая версия

44custom 53168318893638566836custom 53281710711767139186custom 52517053718142874052🍓1custom 52289442012190628241

11 Jul 2026, 09:35 UTC≈3,140 views100 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔮Fan art for AnsArt

72custom 531683188936385668312custom 525170537181428740510🍓3custom 52289442012190628241custom 53281710711767139181custom 53303560713640460861

7 Jul 2026, 11:38 UTC478 views36 reactions6 Starsread 8 August 2026

Спасибо за звёзды🥰

27custom 52517053718142874053custom 54697440638151029063custom 52289442012190628241custom 53281710711767139181custom 53303560713640460861

6 Jul 2026, 17:49 UTC523 views46 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🌸Хотел как-то поэкспериментировать с формой, и лайном

29custom 533035607136404608612🍓2custom 52289442012190628241custom 52517053718142874051custom 54697440638151029061

6 Jul 2026, 17:49 UTC546 views73 reactions50 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

so... u guys liked my gift? ^.^

58custom 52289442012190628246custom 52517053718142874056🍓1custom 53281710711767139181custom 54697440638151029061

4 Jul 2026, 14:49 UTC495 views39 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

50 реакций и сразу выпускаю новый арт

31custom 54697440638151029064custom 52517053718142874052custom 52289442012190628241custom 53281710711767139181

4 Jul 2026, 14:45 UTC499 views69 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔮 Art for zavarusha

53custom 53144046530210309539custom 53281710711767139185custom 52517053718142874052

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @mostcartoon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 253,085 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“mostcartoon” (@mostcartoon), 432 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mostcartoon.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.