Channel
@mostafamousapoor
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
30subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001054214297 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mostafamousapoor |
| Description | بماند به یادگار از من بعد از من |
| Created | Between 1 May 2016 and 31 December 2016— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mostafamousapoor |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:47 | 30 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:05 | 30 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 23 October 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (23 October 2021 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 18 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 03:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
📌اگر درآمدت خوب است، پس چرا اینجایی؟ سالها پیش برای همکاری در پروژهای تبلیغاتی، با فردی ملاقات کردم. او برای تحتتأثیر قرار دادن من، دستهچک صدبرگیاش را با چنان پرستیژی روی میز گذاشت که گویی سوئیچ آخرین مدل ماشین لوکس یا جدیدترین آیفون است! رفتارش دقیقاً مثل معلمهای سختگیر دهههای گذشته بود که برای زهرچشم گرفتن از کلاس، همان اول کار یکی را تنبیه میکردند. او با همان ژست طلبکارانه پرسید: «کارت چیست؟» گفتم: «نمای…
❓شغل شما چیست؟ پیشتر نوشتم که فضای مجازی پر شده از فعالان و کارشناسان مختلف، اما کسی خود را کارشناس «فکر کردن» معرفی نمیکند. https://t.me/mostafamousapoor/575 📌مدتی پیش در جمعی از فعالان اقتصادی، فردی که کنارم نشسته بود پرسید: حوزه کاری شما چیست؟ گفتم: معمار حل مسئله هستم. مکث کرد. احتمالاً منتظر عنوانی آشناتر مثل؛ مشاور، وکیل، کارآفرین، مدیر یا کارمند بود. 💡اجازه دهید توضیح بدهم. اگر با تفکر سیستمی آشنا باشید، …
#چرا_تفکر_نقادانه در روزهایی که جامعه در سوگ و ابهام ایستاده، بیش از همیشه به کسانی نیاز داریم که میانِ هیجان و خشم، «تفکر» را زنده نگه دارند. فضای مجازی پر شده از فعالان و کارشناسان رسانه، کارشناسان نظامی و سیاسی، کارشناسان روابط بین الملل ، خانواده، کار و کسب، هر جور کارشناسی بخواهی میتوانید پیدا کنید حتی مشاوره اسلامی🤔 اما هیچ کسی ادعا نمیکند که کارشناس #فکر کردن است. اساساً فکر کردن سختترین کاری است که انسان…
در روزهایی که جامعه در سوگ و ابهام ایستاده، بیش از همیشه به کسانی نیاز داریم که میانِ هیجان و خشم، «قانون» را زنده نگه دارند. روز وکیل فقط بزرگداشت یک شغل نیست؛ یادآوریِ این است که عدالت، در اوج فشارهای هیجانی هم باید عقلانی بماند.⚖️ در اقتصادِ بحرانزده، خطاهای شناختی جمعی فعال میشود؛ ترس، خشم، تعمیمهای شتابزده… و اینجاست که وکیل، تنها مدافع یک پرونده نیست؛ مدافعِ فرایندِ منصفانهٔ تصمیمگیری است. ⚖️به همهٔ و…
Photo, posted without a caption
در روزهایی که خبر از ما جلوتر میدود، مکث کردن یک مهارت است، نه ضعف. #این_روزها @mostafamousapoor
خلیج فارس @mostafamousapoor
امروز،( یازده بهمن) روز ویراستار است؛ آنکه کلمات را نجات میدهد تا معنا، زیر فشارِ ترس و شتاب، تحریف نشود. در این روزها، بیش از همیشه به ویرایشِ فکر، امید و تصمیم نیاز داریم. @mostafamousapoor
سلام به آنهایی که رفتند، اما قطبنمای تصمیمشان خاموش نشد. ایران با تصمیمهای شجاعانه زنده میماند، نه با ترسهایی که به ما تزریق میکنند. مراقب ذهنمان باشیم. @mostafamousapoor
در اولین کنفرانس بینالمللی بلاکچین deBlock حضور داشتم؛ جایی که نوآوریهای بلاکچین، داراییهای دیجیتال و نقش آنها در اقتصاد آینده مرور شد. بهعنوان پژوهشگر مالیدرمانی و کارشناس اقتصادی اسبق شرکت ققنوس، همیشه روی پیوند میان سواد مالی دیجیتال و رفتار سرمایهگذاری مردم تأکید میکنم. شناخت بلاکچین و رمزداراییها دیگر یک انتخاب نیست؛ یک ضرورت شناختی برای تصمیمگیری درست مالی است. برای من این رویداد فرصتی بود برای بهر…
📝مقاله با موضوع فناوری و مالیات به قلم فرشید رستگار مصطفی موسی پور 📊 https://nakhostnews.com/?p=132143 @mostafamousapoor
سلام امید موجود بالداری است که بربلندیهای روح مینشیند و بی کلام، نغمه میخواند و هرگز دست نمیکشد.🧿 شاید این پیام برای شما همان موجود بالدار باشد زیرا من امیدوارم که شما را دوباره ببینم 🌹 مشتاق سلامتی شما مصطفی موسی پور یکشنبه اول تیر ۱۴۰۴ https://t.me/mostafamousapoor
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mostafamousapoor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@mostafamousapoor named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“نگاهی به آینده” (@mostafamousapoor), 30 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mostafamousapoor.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.