Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Привет, Московский Политех

@mospolyab

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,818subscribers

+38 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001408244599
TypeChannel
Username@mospolyab
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mospolyab

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (2 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@mospolyab/1664 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 11:10 UTC@mospolytech/78923 Aug 2026, 11:11 UTC1.00under a minute
@mospolyab/1666 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 13:06 UTC@mospolytech/78933 Aug 2026, 13:08 UTC1.002 minutes
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@mospolytech14 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0072 secondsthis entry (104)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 17 comparable posts for this entry, running 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @mospolyab — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

3,7803,8183,7996 August 2026 — 3,780 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,780 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,785 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,818 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net +38. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,774–3,824 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 02:523,818+33
7 Aug 2026, 00:383,785+5
6 Aug 2026, 04:313,780no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:463,780first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
56.5%
avg views ÷ 3,818 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,160
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.876%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (31 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total38,803
Reactions total340
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 06:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 06s
Average length
42s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

330 reactions across 17 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
11735.5%
👍4613.9%
🔥3510.6%
👏247.27%
🦄216.36%
💋175.15%
❤‍🔥123.64%
💘113.33%
103.03%
🏆103.03%
👾82.42%
custom 538866403627343557541.21%
😭41.21%
👨‍💻30.909%
🤓30.909%
👎20.606%
💔10.303%
😁10.303%
😢10.303%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 340reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC221 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @mospolytechPhoto

🎉 Опубликованы приказы о зачислении по общему конкурсу! Если вы участвовали в основном конкурсе на бюджетные места, самое время проверить результаты. 📄 Ознакомиться с приказами можно на официальном сайте Московского Политеха. Поздравляем всех, кто стал частью нашей большой семьи! Добро пожаловать в Московский Политех! 💙 Напомним: прием документов в магистратуру продолжится до 12 августа, а заключение договоров на

🔥178🏆43💘2

6 Aug 2026, 11:03 UTC≈3,020 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

⏳ Напоминаем: уже через 2 часа! В 16:00 Центр карьеры Московского Политеха проведёт прямой эфир для абитуриентов. Обсудим, как ещё во время учёбы получить первый профессиональный опыт, собрать сильное портфолио и повысить свои шансы на успешный старт карьеры. Если вы ещё не успели зарегистрироваться — сделать это можно прямо сейчас. → Регистрация Ждём вас в эфире! 🤍 Проголосовать | @mospolyab | Мы в МАХ

🔥32👍1🦄1

6 Aug 2026, 08:10 UTC≈2,950 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🗓 Когда дни открытых дверей Московского Политеха в августе? В этом месяце приглашаем на две встречи: 〰️ 19 августа — вечер открытых дверей магистратуры (регистрация); 〰️ 27 августа — онлайн-день открытых дверей для абитуриентов бакалавриата и специалитета (регистрация). Узнайте больше об образовательных программах, особенностях поступления и получите ответы на все интересующие вопросы 🩵 Проголосовать | @mospolyab

👍3🦄21

5 Aug 2026, 17:55 UTC349 views113 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @mospolytech

🎓 День приёма согласий на зачисление завершён. Самое волнительное впереди — уже 7 августа будут опубликованы приказы о зачислении в университет. А пока давайте посмотрим, кто сегодня с Московским Политехом. Отметьтесь реакцией: ❤️ — абитуриент, поступаю в этом году 🔥 — студент Московского Политеха 🏆 — выпускник Московского Политеха 💯 — сотрудник университета 👏 — родитель Посмотрим, кого среди нас сегодня больше!

66👏24🔥11🏆6custom 53886640362734355754💋1😢1

5 Aug 2026, 15:59 UTC≈2,930 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🏠 Напоминаем: у поступающих на бюджет осталось 7 дней, чтобы выбрать приоритетность общежитий Московского Политеха! Если вы планируете проживать в общежитии Московского Политеха, не забудьте выбрать приоритетность общежитий в установленные сроки. Чтобы всё прошло без ошибок, рекомендуем заранее ознакомиться с памяткой — в ней собрана вся необходимая информация: порядок заселения, сроки, перечень документов, медицин

5👍3🦄2👾1💋1🤓1

5 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC362 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @mospolytechPhoto

🥳 Ты в команде Московского Политеха! Если ты уже зачислен по особой, отдельной и целевой квотам и без вступительных испытаний, для тебя уже создан личный кабинет студента. Что важно сделать прямо сейчас? Получить реквизиты единой учетной записи (ЕУЗ). Для этого пройди по ссылке и следуй инструкции. После этого ты сможешь войти в личный кабинет. В личном кабинете уже доступны: — справка об обучении — важная информ

💋94👍2🦄2💔1

5 Aug 2026, 11:03 UTC≈2,620 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

📢 Уже завтра — прямой эфир о карьере! Хотите узнать, как начать строить карьеру ещё во время учёбы? 📅 6 августа в 16:00 присоединяйтесь к прямому эфиру с Центром карьеры Московского Политеха. Расскажем, как собрать портфолио, пройти стажировку и получить первый оффер ещё до выпуска. Не забудьте зарегистрироваться по ссылке. 💬 Вопросы к спикерам можно оставить здесь. Проголосовать | @mospolyab | Мы в МАХ

💘5❤‍🔥4👍3

4 Aug 2026, 19:35 UTC≈2,880 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🦄92👍2

4 Aug 2026, 15:08 UTC≈2,870 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🎮 Любишь игры? Попробуй создавать их сам В Московском Политехе на направлении «Программное обеспечение игровой компьютерной индустрии» студенты проходят путь от идеи до собственного игрового проекта. Уже с первых курсов — работа с игровыми движками, реальные проекты, хакатоны, командная разработка и портфолио. А после выпуска — возможность построить карьеру в игровой индустрии, создавая игры, интерактивные приложен

42👍2👨‍💻2👎1🦄1

4 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC340 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @mospolytechPhoto

✨ Абитуриент, твои старания заслуживают большего! Напоминаем: в Московском Политехе для первокурсников с высокими результатами поступления действует скидка 25% на оплату проживания в общежитии. Если твой средний балл по вступительным испытаниям составляет 85 и выше (без учёта индивидуальных достижений) или ты поступаешь без вступительных испытаний, ты можешь воспользоваться этой мерой поддержки. Пусть высокие резу

3👍3👾2👎1😁1

4 Aug 2026, 11:16 UTC≈2,900 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

‼️‼️‼️‼️ Остались ровно сутки, чтобы подать согласие на зачисление в Московский Политех! 5 августа у абитуриентов останется последняя возможность подать согласие на зачисление на бюджетные места по общему конкурсу. Прием документов завершится в 12:00 по московскому времени. Также напоминаем о важных датах приемной кампании 2026 года: 5 августа (до 12:00 по мск) — завершение приема согласий на зачисление от поступа

😭43👍3👾2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mospolyab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 5,577 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Привет, Московский Политех” (@mospolyab), 3,818 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mospolyab.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.