Channel
@mospogoda20
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,446subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001765408188 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mospogoda20 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mospogoda20 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 10:25 | 2,446 | +3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:01 | 2,443 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:32 | 2,446 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:15 | 2,445 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:05 | 2,445 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 21 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
895 reactions across 15 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 382 | 42.7% | |
| 🔥 | 164 | 18.3% | |
| 👍 | 152 | 17.0% | |
| 👏 | 44 | 4.92% | |
| 🍾 | 28 | 3.13% | |
| 🐳 | 27 | 3.02% | |
| 🎉 | 25 | 2.79% | |
| ❤🔥 | 23 | 2.57% | |
| ⚡ | 17 | 1.90% | |
| 😱 | 7 | 0.782% | |
| 👌 | 6 | 0.67% | |
| 🤩 | 6 | 0.67% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 0.559% | |
| 💅 | 3 | 0.335% | |
| 👻 | 2 | 0.223% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.112% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.112% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 0.112% | |
| 🙈 | 1 | 0.112% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 895reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 21 May 2026 to 28 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Дорогие друзья, если кто-то сегодня планировал быть рядом, милости просим к нашему шалашу! https://russia.ru/events/issleduem-rossiiu-otkuda-i-pocemu-duet-veter Надо только зарегистрироваться!
❤10👌6🔥3
Signed Москва.Погода2.0
Именно сейчас (мы в районе истинного полудня) высота Солнца над Москвой - максимальная в году! С Днем летнего солнцестояния всех!
👍41🍾28🎉17🔥6❤🔥5💅2
Signed Москва.Погода2.0
"Городской остров конвекции" или "The Road to CAPE" сегодня днем
🔥25👍14❤11
Signed Москва.Погода2.0
В ночном эфире над горизонтом - серебристая облачность или по-правильному Noctilucent clouds (лат.) Такие облака лучше всего наблюдать на северной половине небосвода. Физически, это облака из ледяных кристаллов, расположенные в мезосфере на высоте 70-80 км (самые высокие!) и подсвечиваемые Солнцем из-под горизонта. Для их образования необходимо наличие влаги на таких больших высотах, а также высота Солнца около …
❤36👍5🔥5
Signed Москва.Погода2.0
Дорогие друзья! Завтра в музее Москвы большое событие - День нашего совместного университета МГУ-ППИ. Будет много интересного про обучение в Китае, виртуальный тур, и, конечно публичные лекции. Среди академиков на этот раз затесался и Ваш покорный слуга как лектор самого крупного в мире русскоязычного курса по городскому климату. Я буду рассказывать про климатические изменения, и что нам всем с ними делать. Упо…
❤32🔥13
Signed Москва.Погода2.0
Результаты вчерашней водной феерии в Москве и области Когда говорят, что различия в пределах Московской области сравнимы с различиями внутри небольшого государства (выберем похожее по площади - Швейцарию), то в этом есть зерно истины. Оцените разницу в сумме вчерашних осадков по данным ГМЦ: пестрота впечатляет. Особенно разница между Клином и Коломной - в 47 раз!
👍23😱7❤🔥6❤2🔥2💅1🤩1
Signed Москва.Погода2.0
Наверняка, многие уже слышали, что предстоящая фаза колебания Эль-Ниньо 2026-2027 годов, оказывающее влияние на климат (как минимум!) тропической зоны и Южного полушария ожидается едва ли не рекордной ("супер Эль-Ниньо"). Классическое нагнетание в СМИ, саспенс - но давайте спросим специалистов (СМИ так делают редко) . Ниже - комментарий, наверное на текущий момент специалиста №1 в России по тропической метеорологи…
🔥42👍23❤10🤔3💯1
Signed Москва.Погода2.0
На юго-западе Москвы в результате прохождения холодного атмосферного фронта полный набор неблагоприятных погодных явлений: ливень, гроза и град диаметром до 1-2 см (на видео)
🔥23⚡16🐳4🙈1
Signed Москва.Погода2.0
А вот и герой дня (+ повелитель климатических рисков )
❤55👏36🔥21👍4🎉3❤🔥1
Signed Москва.Погода2.0
Рейтинг российских городов-миллионеров по климатическим рискам/опасностям (тизер) Кто-то отмечает 2 июня День здорового питания, а мы с прилежным и старательным студентом 4 курса географического факультета МГУ Григорием Королевым защитили бакалаврский диплом по довольно горячей теме. Иначе говоря, впервые в РФ Григорий статистически грамотно создал рейтинг городов с населением > 1 млн человек по пяти климатическим о…
❤53👍15🔥14❤🔥11🎉5👎1
Signed Москва.Погода2.0
"Вопросы о климате с Павлом Константиновым. Часть 9 и заключительная Что же делать с климатическими изменениями?" В выпуске поговорим об опасных последствиях климатических изменений: смене режима осадков, о лесных пожарах, климатических адаптации и митигации, и о том, почему что-то делать надо было "уже вчера". Интересно, но мало? Вот что можно почитать/посмотреть дополнительно: 1. Доклад о климатических рисках…
❤24
Signed Москва.Погода2.0
В последний день мая - последний выпуск нашего учебного курса "Вопросы о климате с Павлом Константиновым. Часть 9. Что же делать с климатическими изменениями?" В нем поговорим об опасных последствиях климатических изменений: смене режима осадков, о лесных пожарах, климатических адаптации и митигации, и о том, почему что-то делать надо было "уже вчера". Так что сегодня вечером - премьера ! Серию роликов подготови…
❤25👏6👍3
Signed Москва.Погода2.0
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @mospogoda20. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 743,956 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Климат и погода для умных” (@mospogoda20), 2,446 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mospogoda20.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.