Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝙈𝙤𝙧𝙥𝙝𝙚𝙪𝙨

@morpheus_spn

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

335subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002425496769
TypeChannel
Username@morpheus_spn
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/morpheus_spn

Growth

335338336.511 Aug 2026, 14:47 — 338 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 15:01 — 338 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 02:52 — 335 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 14:4712 Aug 2026, 02:52
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 335–338 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 02:52335-3
11 Aug 2026, 15:01338no change
11 Aug 2026, 14:47338first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 10 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.2%
avg views ÷ 335 subscribers
Avg views / post
47.5
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.56%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held19 (10 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total903
Reactions total11
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

11 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥327.3%
🍓327.3%
👍327.3%
💋218.2%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 13:55 UTC10 viewsread 11 August 2026

تعداد he ها زیاد شد خوشحالم دیگه🎀

Signed 𝐑𝐞𝐳𝐯𝐚𝐧″ᴰᵉᵉ ᵂⁱⁿᶜʰᵉˢᵗᵉʳ″

11 Aug 2026, 13:55 UTC10 viewsread 11 August 2026

حتمااا

Signed 𝐑𝐞𝐳𝐯𝐚𝐧″ᴰᵉᵉ ᵂⁱⁿᶜʰᵉˢᵗᵉʳ″

11 Aug 2026, 13:53 UTC11 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

اجی این اینجا باشه بعدش میام جواب میدم اگه میشه😭

👍1

Signed 𝐑𝐞𝐳𝐯𝐚𝐧″ᴰᵉᵉ ᵂⁱⁿᶜʰᵉˢᵗᵉʳ″

11 Aug 2026, 13:53 UTC8 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @Demon_motel

خب خب خب به سومین چالش هتلِ شیطان خوش اومدید.🛎 این بار قراره بفهمیم اگه با یه سری کارکتر تویِ یه سناریوی رندوم قرار میگرفتید چه بلایی سرتون می‌اومد. در صورت‌تمایل، این پیام رو فور کنید. اسمتون/نیک‌نیمتون رو بگید. سه تا از کارکترهای سوپرنچرال رو انتخاب کنید.ولی لطفا فقط موردعلاقه هاتونو انتخاب نکنید.. برای هرکدوم یکی از این چند حالت رو انتخاب کنید عاشقشم/دوستش دارم/حسی بهش ندارم/ ازش متنفرم/ همین الان می‌تونم بکشمش.

Signed 𝐑𝐞𝐳𝐯𝐚𝐧″ᴰᵉᵉ ᵂⁱⁿᶜʰᵉˢᵗᵉʳ″

11 Aug 2026, 13:49 UTC10 viewsread 11 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed 𝐑𝐞𝐳𝐯𝐚𝐧″ᴰᵉᵉ ᵂⁱⁿᶜʰᵉˢᵗᵉʳ″

11 Aug 2026, 13:46 UTC14 viewsread 11 August 2026

بفرمایید

Signed 𝐑𝐞𝐳𝐯𝐚𝐧″ᴰᵉᵉ ᵂⁱⁿᶜʰᵉˢᵗᵉʳ″

11 Aug 2026, 12:44 UTC33 viewsread 11 August 2026

رضوان جغد سبز سوپرنچرال Radiohead/ The neighbourhood تئو ریکن 

Signed 𝐑𝐞𝐳𝐯𝐚𝐧″ᴰᵉᵉ ᵂⁱⁿᶜʰᵉˢᵗᵉʳ″

11 Aug 2026, 12:43 UTC32 views0 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @W_inchester

💢این پیامو فور کن چنلت💢 اسمتو حیوون،رنگ،سریال،خواننده‌ی موردعلاقت و یک کاراکتر بهم بگو تا من یه نقاشی از چیزایی که گفتی برات بکشمممم جواب ها طول میکشه صبر داشته باشین توی چنل جوین باشین نقاشیی که میکشم قرار نیست پرفکت باشه ظرفیت:۱۵تا(برای واقعی بیشتر نشه ناسجساسنسو)

Signed 𝐑𝐞𝐳𝐯𝐚𝐧″ᴰᵉᵉ ᵂⁱⁿᶜʰᵉˢᵗᵉʳ″

11 Aug 2026, 12:09 UTC46 viewsread 11 August 2026

پیامم پاک نکنید بی‌زحمت گمتون میکنم

Signed 𝐑𝐞𝐳𝐯𝐚𝐧″ᴰᵉᵉ ᵂⁱⁿᶜʰᵉˢᵗᵉʳ″

11 Aug 2026, 12:04 UTC50 viewsread 11 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed 𝐑𝐞𝐳𝐯𝐚𝐧″ᴰᵉᵉ ᵂⁱⁿᶜʰᵉˢᵗᵉʳ″

11 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC309 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026

این پیام رو فور کنید داخل چنل هاتون تا بگم اگه یه قاتل سریالی بودید الگوی انتخاب قربانی هاتون و نحوه کشتن اونها چطوری بود لیمیت تا وقتی خط بخوره لطفاً جنسیت موردنظرتون رو هم مشخص کنید اگه میشناسمتون پارتی دارید

❤‍🔥3💋2🍓1

Signed 𝐑𝐞𝐳𝐯𝐚𝐧″ᴰᵉᵉ ᵂⁱⁿᶜʰᵉˢᵗᵉʳ″

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @morpheus_spn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 187,941 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝙈𝙤𝙧𝙥𝙝𝙚𝙪𝙨” (@morpheus_spn), 335 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/morpheus_spn.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.