2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 417–419 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 05:32
418
no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:12
418
first reading
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 1 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
312
Videos
56
Links
88
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
20s
Average length
7s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
242 reactions across 12 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
110
45.5%
🔥
40
16.5%
❤🔥
37
15.3%
👍
16
6.61%
🎉
10
4.13%
👏
7
2.89%
👾
6
2.48%
💯
6
2.48%
⚡
4
1.65%
👀
3
1.24%
☃
1
0.413%
🕊
1
0.413%
🥰
1
0.413%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 242reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 1 October 2025 to 18 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 12 we hold a reading for · 58%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @morozgen. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 October 2025 to 18 December 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Подводим итоги 9 сезона
Финальный рейтинг (после сведения всех голосов):
1. Воспоминания о мечте / Yar Kirsanov — 43,39% (5 голосов DAO)
2. Луч / Galia Li — 39,90% (1 голос DAO)
3. Отсутствие присутствия / Арсений Меньщиков — 16,71% (3 голоса DAO)
Разница между двумя сильнейшими работами остаётся минимальной и находится в пределах погрешности, поэтому осознанно оставляю за собой право объявить двух победителей в эт…
9 season / голосование
сильный выдался сезон, на финальное голосование вышли три работы:
отсутствие присутствия / Арсений Меньщиков
Работа - не автопортрет, а попытка зафиксировать то состояние, когда человек присутствует физически, но не успевает за собой внутренним. Исчезновение не как драма, а как обыденность. Внутреннее "я" растворяется, и только пальто - единственная устойчивая идентичность
воспоминания о мечт…
9 SEASON
Что происходит?
Продолжаю небольшую личную программу поддержки начинающих цифровых (традиционных тоже) художников
Какие условия?
Главное — уникальность работы, отсутствие передачи прав на работу третьим лицам и то, что она ранее не продавалась
Бюджет в рамках девятого сезона
— 500$ (общая сумма для покупки 1-2 работ)
Что по дедлайнам?
Подача заявок на девятый сезон будет происходить на сайте до 7 Декабря…
8 сезон / финал
Благодарю всех за голоса, разрыв вышел минимальный, после всех подсчётов итоги получаются следующее:
«Fire Walk With Us» / kolbovskiy — 58.6% (победитель)
«look at nothing» / fieldren — 41.4%
Поздравляю!
на следующей неделе стартуем 9
8 season / голосование
в DAO результаты подведены, теперь голос за вами: в этом сезоне в финал вышли сразу два цифровых триптиха
«look at nothing» / fieldren
Триптих видео коллажей имеет в основе реальные локации Москвы (ГЭС2, парк Горького, типовой дом в районе станции Электрозаводская), зафиксированные в момент поиска необходимого ощущения пустоты посреди сенсорного перегруза от количества людей, звуков, движения …
Подготовили новую онлайн-лекцию 🎓
Выставка-переход: мультимедиа, коллаборация и трансформация
23 октября | 19:00 (МСК)
Вас ждёт вебинар от кураторов и участников выставки «Формат был изменён» — совместного проекта компании dreamlaser и Anna Nova Gallery, представленного в пространстве ЦЕХ *.
Спикеры:
Артём Мороз — генеративный аудиовизуальный художник, куратор от Anna Nova Gallery
Анна Гагарина — куратор выставоч…
8 SEASON
Что происходит?
Продолжаю небольшую личную программу поддержки начинающих цифровых (традиционных тоже) художников
Какие условия?
Главное — уникальность работы, отсутствие передачи прав на работу третьим лицам и то, что она ранее не продавалась
Бюджет в рамках восьмого сезона
— 500$ (общая сумма для покупки 1-2 работ)
Что по дедлайнам?
Подача заявок на восьмой сезон будет происходить на сайте до 21 Октябр…
❤18🔥12👍6
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @morozgen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 1 October 2025 to 18 December 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Артём Мороз” (@morozgen), 418 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/morozgen.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
