Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

MORFI . ᴘᴏʀᴛ

@morfuses

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

335subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002408515891
TypeChannel
Username@morfuses
DescriptionOwner : @morfisee — 𝖬𝗈𝗋𝖿𝗂 | 𝖬𝗈𝗋𝖿𝗂𝗇 𝖲𝗍𝖺𝗋𝗍: 19.07.25 сотрудничаю с — @Alternative_banners | @liliDeStorm PNG ⥥ https://t.me/addlist/04Xo3WrVppVmMTli
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/morfuses

Growth

33511 Aug 2026, 14:17 — 335 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 14:30 — 335 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 14:1711 Aug 2026, 14:30
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 334–336 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 14:30335no change
11 Aug 2026, 14:17335first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
91.7%
avg views ÷ 335 subscribers
Avg views / post
307
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
17.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held20 (20 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total6,141
Reactions total425
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 14:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
101
Links
51

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

425 reactions across 7 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 51994292761552854606615.5%
custom 51997407128238536745713.4%
custom 51974411701537077205613.2%
custom 53168888664000089754911.5%
custom 54656125543844722784510.6%
custom 5999054089617413496399.18%
custom 5339229465207663650378.71%
custom 5336985709867724548307.06%
custom 5339467565309651634286.59%
custom 5190802374779767852174.00%
custom 533279144666991731910.235%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 425reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
169
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 20 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
118
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @morfuses. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 16:18 UTC58 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @tsysonderPhoto

🌟🧪 Good 🥹 Morning Morfi ! @tsysonder – new work – 20:00 h 🎀 𝐛𝐲 𝐦𝐞 : у меня глаз дёргаться начал, без шуток хпха.. но этот формат — дуэта, очень зашёл :") обсуждать все со своим партнёром, думать, делать вместе в конце концов, так прикольно оказывается, рада что моим партнёром тут была именно морфи. даже если мы ниче не получим, это был хороший опыт, спасибо организаторам ! — #banner 🧪 pri

9 Aug 2026, 14:42 UTC269 views95 reactions20 Starsread 11 August 2026
Photo

⚪️ ✅─ 𝘔𝘖𝘙𝘍𝘐.𝘯 : 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍 🤩 🐏 : Good . night ┅ 𝓣𝗌𝗎𝗄𝖾 🎀 🌟 спасибо огромное за совместную работу дорогой Цуке : 𝓁𝑜𝓋𝑒 𝓎𝑜𝓊 . . . 🌟 𝖨𝖿 𝖨 𝗐𝖾𝗋𝖾 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗆𝗈𝗈𝗇, — 🐏 𝗐𝗈𝗎𝗅𝖽 𝗒𝗈𝗎 𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗅𝗅 𝗅𝗈𝗈𝗄 𝖺𝗍 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋𝗌? 🐏🐏 ✅ for : @CHEESE4FACTORY

custom 533922946520766365037custom 533698570986772454830custom 533946756530965163428

8 Aug 2026, 11:47 UTC143 views19 reactionsread 11 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 54656125543844722787custom 53168888664000089756custom 59990540896174134966

8 Aug 2026, 11:46 UTC163 views114 reactions31 Starsread 11 August 2026
Photo

⚪️ ✔️─ 𝘔𝘖𝘙𝘍𝘐.𝘯 : 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍 🤩 ⚪️ thank for 300 🐏 🧸 хочу сказать огромное спасибо, за такое прекрасное число подписчиков на моём канале, а именно — 300 ! трактористов / ⚪️ всего этого я добилась благодаря вам, мои дорогие, мне очень приятно за ваши реакции, ваш актив, и вашу любовь к моим работам которые вы продолжаете ждать несмотря ни на что! Я также замечаю свои упоминания в других канал, особенно в дм, возможно

custom 531688886640000897543custom 546561255438447227838custom 599905408961741349633

5 Aug 2026, 18:40 UTC211 views15 reactionsread 11 August 2026

скоро новая работка, я всё ещё живаа 😏 пока доделываю, может у вас есть пожелания с каким/и персонаж/ами могу я сделать практику?

custom 519080237477976785215

28 Jul 2026, 12:27 UTC524 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 51908023747797678522

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @morfuses. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 932,728 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MORFI . ᴘᴏʀᴛ” (@morfuses), 335 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/morfuses.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.