Automotive — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 42 days, net -62. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 670–750 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 11:01
679
-13
10 Sept 2026, 18:21
692
-19
1 Sept 2026, 06:08
711
-7
24 Aug 2026, 06:34
718
-9
16 Aug 2026, 19:14
727
-12
9 Aug 2026, 04:21
739
-2
8 Aug 2026, 10:01
741
first reading
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 45s
Average length
53s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
444 reactions across 12 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5337300818733338566
74
16.7%
👏
51
11.5%
custom 5341332483059255336
40
9.01%
custom 5341512137246279732
34
7.66%
custom 5339188078902805937
22
4.95%
❤🔥
22
4.95%
🫡
22
4.95%
🐳
20
4.50%
✍
16
3.60%
custom 5377507755642888418
13
2.93%
custom 5307495098613773492
12
2.70%
🥰
12
2.70%
custom 5249432273257765278
11
2.48%
custom 5425014363134135034
11
2.48%
🤣
9
2.03%
custom 5309882984466228650
8
1.80%
⚡
8
1.80%
💯
8
1.80%
🤔
8
1.80%
custom 5217726154663796197
7
1.58%
14 further kinds
36
8.11%
Custom emoji. 10 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 444 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
30
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 12 we hold a reading for · 83%
Most on one post
8
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @morda_kirpi4om. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🏍 ФОТО, КОТОРОЕ Я ДОЛГО НЕ ПОКАЗЫВАЛ
На первом кадре я красивый. Сын на баке, мотоцикл под нами, вечер, город. Чёрно-белое фото, взгляд вдаль. Хоть на обложку журнала.
А теперь посмотрите, что на мне надето. Кроссовки. Джинсы. Кожаная куртка - «мотоциклетная» примерно в той же степени, в какой чехол от гитары является бронежилетом. Шлем есть. На этом список закончился. Я тогда искренне считал, что защита нужна тем,…
🍩 ПОЛНОТЕЛЫЙ КИРПИЧ С ДЫРКАМИ
Сцена повторяется у нас в офисе примерно раз в неделю. Человек просит полнотелый кирпич на цоколь. Кладем перед ним образец. Он видит три отверстия и отодвигает кирпич обратно с лицом человека, которому вместо стейка принесли соевую котлету.
И вот стою я. Взрослый мужик. В одной руке кирпич, в другой пончик. Объясняю, что это одна и та же физика. Со стороны - цирк. По факту - лекция.
…
🧱 КЛЕЙМО ЕСТЬ. ЗАВОДА НЕТ
В четверг к нам в офис в Набережных Челнах пришёл мужчина. В руках - кирпич. Не образец из каталога. Настоящий. Оставшийся от постройки дома или выломал из стены и привёз показать.
Дальше история, которую я слышу каждый год. Дом начали строить еще родители в начале двухтысячных. Денег хватило ровно до перекрытия. Первый этаж успели закрыть кирпичом. Второй закрыли профлистом. Решили: подко…
ЭКОНОМИКА-2026 НА ОДНОЙ КАРТИНКЕ
Птица - государство. Рыба - предприниматель. Полёт нормальный.
Билет на этот рейс рыба не покупала. НДС - 22%. Порог упрощёнки и патента уронили с 60 миллионов до 20. Ставку ЦБ снижают десятый раз подряд по четверти пункта. До вменяемых денег доползём аккурат к пенсии - своей или ставки, кто первый. У розницы худшая оценка дел за всю историю. Стройка за первый квартал - минус десять…
ПЯТАЯ ЧАСТЬ ВАШЕГО ФАСАДА — ЭТО НЕ КИРПИЧ
Неделю меня здесь не было. Кто ждал - спасибо. Кто не заметил - сейчас исправим: возвращаться положено с темой, на которой теряют деньги молча.
Кирпич у нас выбирают серьёзнее, чем машину. Полгода каталогов. Поездки по выставкам. Образцы стоят на подоконнике, как трофеи. Семейный совет по баварской кладке проходит жёстче, чем переговоры о даче у тёщи. И это правильно: фасад…
⚠️ У НАС УГНАЛИ ССЫЛКУ. ЧИТАТЬ ВСЕМ
Я тут который месяц рассказываю, как разводят на стройке. Сегодня наглядное пособие: попытались развести нас.
Что случилось. Раньше у канала был адрес mk_abalin. На время розыгрыша я закрывал канал - и не знал одной детали: как только канал становится частным, Telegram отпускает его ссылку в свободное плавание. Сразу. Как место на парковке: отъехал на минуту - стоит чужая машина.
…
Пост для 400 случайных прохожих, или Зачем вам этот бронежилет 🛡🧱
Понедельник, 20 июля. Открываю статистику и вижу аномалию. Нас стало в два раза больше. Плюс четыре сотни человек за неделю. Обычно такой трафик приваливает в строительный канал, только если на объекте подрались экскаваторщики, и кто-то слил видео в сеть.
Но мы просто честно разыграли робот-пылесос.
Давайте сразу расставим точки над «i». Я знаю, что…
🛑 СТОП-ИГРА! Пыль осела. Мы знаем, к кому уезжает черный киборг! 🤖💦
Ровно 12:00. Рубильник опущен, опрос остановлен.
Я смотрю на итоговые цифры (скриншот прикрепил) и просто снимаю шляпу.
782 живых голоса. Вы устроили здесь такую предвыборную мясорубку, что любой политтехнолог позавидует. Ссылки летали по чатам, родственники поднимались по тревоге, голоса шли до последней минуты.
Это была не просто голосовалка. Эт…
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @morda_kirpi4om. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Морда кирпичом” (@morda_kirpi4om), 679 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/morda_kirpi4om.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.