Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

🥩 Mora 𝟔𝟗 Mrucks 🪽

@moramrucks

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

320subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003830304829
TypeChannel
Username@moramrucks
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 26 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/moramrucks

Growth

319320319.57 Aug 2026, 22:30 — 319 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 07:33 — 319 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 18:46 — 320 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 22:308 Aug 2026, 18:46
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 319–320 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 18:46320+1
8 Aug 2026, 07:33319no change
7 Aug 2026, 22:30319first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 26 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
96.4%
avg views ÷ 320 subscribers
Avg views / post
309
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
20.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held16 (26 June 20263 August 2026)
Views total2,160
Reactions total435
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 07:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,002 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 528316270442764288336736.6%
26025.9%
custom 544961967672213541115915.9%
custom 5244664799429695657969.58%
custom 5251558161810224708828.18%
custom 5474349333908328115383.79%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,002reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
302
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 16 we hold a reading for · 50%
Most on one post
159
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @moramrucks. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 June 2026 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 20:23 UTC130 views41 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ставь лаик ЕСЛИ бесит делать уроки

31custom 54496196767221354117custom 52831627044276428833

3 Aug 2026, 17:40 UTC150 views45 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 52831627044276428832113custom 52515581618102247088custom 52446647994296956572custom 54496196767221354111

1 Aug 2026, 10:36 UTC197 views39 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

КОММИШКИ ОТКРЫТЫ ❗️ 👉 ТЫК @moramrucksinfo

custom 544961967672213541126custom 52831627044276428836custom 525155816181022470852

31 Jul 2026, 20:27 UTC217 views36 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

https://t.me/+VsIBuDIVKQ9jYTk6

custom 528316270442764288327custom 525155816181022470854

30 Jul 2026, 14:55 UTC380 views100 reactions9 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

с др рион 🤩

58custom 528316270442764288321custom 544961967672213541119custom 52446647994296956571custom 52515581618102247081

21 Jul 2026, 13:00 UTC569 views82 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 528316270442764288336custom 525155816181022470821custom 5449619676722135411193custom 52446647994296956573

20 Jul 2026, 16:47 UTC517 views92 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

❤️like for keisuke's crack❤️

custom 52515581618102247084223custom 528316270442764288320custom 52446647994296956577

13 Jul 2026, 11:13 UTC757 views77 reactions12 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

поздравим профессора Анаксагора с т-переходом в комментариях!🤗❤️

custom 528316270442764288350custom 52446647994296956571511custom 54496196767221354111

13 Jul 2026, 10:19 UTC607 views44 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

18custom 544961967672213541112custom 528316270442764288310custom 52446647994296956574

12 Jul 2026, 02:25 UTC568 views62 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

first attack😭

custom 52831627044276428833812custom 544961967672213541112

9 Jul 2026, 08:06 UTC614 views69 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 524466479942969565741custom 52831627044276428831511custom 54496196767221354112

5 Jul 2026, 12:01 UTC724 views59 reactions159 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Твоя предположительная долговременная склонность исписывать каракулями эти изображения на самом деле твое подсознание, пытающееся передать что-то тревожащее тебя внутри. прикольненково милашкУуУУ с дршечкой

custom 528316270442764288334custom 52446647994296956571411

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @moramrucks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 530,408 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🥩 Mora 𝟔𝟗 Mrucks 🪽” (@moramrucks), 320 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/moramrucks.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.