Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Moon Call Official πŸ”¬

@mooonncalll

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

301subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002237417502
TypeChannel
Username@mooonncalll
DescriptionWell connected OG Many Will Know Me Dm @iconic_jules for business inquiries. TWITTER : x.com/kccueto09
CreatedBetween 1 May 2024 and 30 September 2024β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/mooonncalll

Growth

301302301.57 Aug 2026, 12:51 β€” 302 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 02:21 β€” 301 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 08:01 β€” 301 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 12:518 Aug 2026, 08:01
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 301–302 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 08:01301no change
8 Aug 2026, 02:21301-1
7 Aug 2026, 12:51302first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 April 2025 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β€” we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
515
Videos
72
Links
539

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 β€” not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
42s
Average length
42s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β€” not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no β‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

245 reactions across 18 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
πŸ‘8133.1%
❀6325.7%
πŸ”₯4920.0%
😁145.71%
❀‍πŸ”₯72.86%
πŸŽ‰62.45%
πŸ‘€62.45%
🍾52.04%
🀣52.04%
πŸ’―41.63%
😭20.816%
πŸ‘10.408%
🀩10.408%
πŸ₯°10.408%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 245reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2025 to 6 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 May 2025, 10:41 UTC793 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Elon bull posted this coin and changed his pfp yet can’t break 100m

πŸ‘3😁3🀣2😭2❀1

Signed Jules 🎭

5 May 2025, 12:27 UTCβ‰ˆ1,650 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Aped here $FRIED (SOL) 900k mc Deep fried memes looking good getting bags here pumping well from dips https://x.com/i/communities/1919234462874767692 https://dexscreener.com/solana/HheMTs1xEyeD514q4bDb2rKQiynC2qHBYWkA1qRFkj8K BpRMSjbQqm26f51HYKeBLfKEs43yXUhaKA8DXvCxpump

πŸ”₯6❀5πŸ‘3😁1

Signed Jules 🎭

5 May 2025, 08:54 UTCβ‰ˆ1,820 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Gm future crypto millionaires

πŸ‘9❀5πŸ”₯3😁2

Signed Jules 🎭

5 May 2025, 08:53 UTCβ‰ˆ1,970 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

After attending #SuiBasecamp in Dubai for Token2049. It’s clear that SUI had the biggest communities in crypto and that’s no surprise given how well the ecosystem has been performing I’ve always been a big fan and holder is $SUI as well as some of its meme Huge respect to the entire SUI community

❀9πŸ’―4πŸ”₯3

Signed Jules 🎭

5 May 2025, 08:48 UTCβ‰ˆ2,030 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @WatcherGuru

FUN FACT: Less than 7% of the global population is invested in crypto. @WatcherGuru

Signed Jules 🎭

4 May 2025, 23:12 UTCβ‰ˆ2,590 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Oh My God $FCW 3x Farting Chicken Wizard sending πŸš€

❀6πŸ‘2πŸ”₯1

Signed Jules 🎭

4 May 2025, 22:45 UTCβ‰ˆ2,780 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

2x for $SFCW. Volume looks good πŸ”₯🫑

πŸ‘11πŸ”₯3πŸŽ‰2❀1

Signed Jules 🎭

4 May 2025, 22:34 UTCβ‰ˆ3,090 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

πŸ˜‚

❀7πŸ‘5😁2🀣1

Signed Jules 🎭

4 May 2025, 22:31 UTCβ‰ˆ3,320 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://dexscreener.com/solana/3kjtwf2Y29pWcaVe4VfEJCN1tweh8q97iMc6fhLbQ5Df Good art πŸ˜‚ $FCW

πŸ‘9❀3🀣2

Signed Jules 🎭

4 May 2025, 17:55 UTCβ‰ˆ3,660 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Looking good 2x for y’all to munch on πŸ”₯

🍾5πŸ‘5πŸ”₯3❀1

Signed Jules 🎭

4 May 2025, 17:05 UTCβ‰ˆ3,420 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026

$VIBE White guy catching a vibe 6TCsjVnAw5v9GMEN39mKrs4KnvShn9c7rYx29fxcpump Trend on TikTok and other socials. This could be a sendπŸ‘€

πŸ‘8πŸ”₯4😁3❀2

Signed Jules 🎭

2 May 2025, 18:53 UTCβ‰ˆ3,600 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

$MODULE - / - ETH I’m watching this β€” good wallets are buying in. Let’s see https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x6252922513af1c335fa3a13b762fc11d133bd7cb

πŸ‘6πŸ”₯3❀2πŸ‘€2

Signed Jules 🎭

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mooonncalll. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œMoon Call Official πŸ”¬β€ (@mooonncalll), 301 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mooonncalll.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.