小男孩为日本带来小女孩

Channel
inside class
@moonvoidclass
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,265subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001305368128 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @moonvoidclass |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/moonvoidclass |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:44 | 1,265 | +3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 1,262 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:05 | 1,266 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:02 | 1,266 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 18.8%
- avg views ÷ 1,265 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 238
- 16 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.755%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 16
- of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (30 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,801 |
| Reactions total | 13 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 21:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
13 reactions across 5 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐳 | 6 | 46.2% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 23.1% | |
| 🌚 | 3 | 23.1% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 7.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
😀
这是知乎 67w followers 的大V,这是他最新回答的流量(点赞数)。 知乎上市前的用户粉丝有价值,现在应该没价值。
アニメ「青春ブタ野郎」シリーズ公式: ━━━━━━━━━━━━━ メモリアルビジュアル 牧之原翔子 ver. 公開👰 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 最後に思い出をくれませんか? 『青春ブタ野郎はディアフレンドの夢を見ない』 10月16日 劇場公開 “青ブタ”完結へ―― ao-buta.com/dearfriend/ #青ブタ https://twitter.com/aobuta_anime/status/2050894387060879668 https://x.com/teru_teru_009/status/2050896141966057665
🐳3
10月份动画放映,根据现在的经济趋势预测,有机会看到日元,美债和久留美的亲妈一起起飞。真正的 4D 动画。
什么神人漫画 ▎Source
Photo, posted without a caption
今天久留美发信息给我说,这是她成年以来最糟糕的夏天。上半年她眼红身边同学都靠炒外汇赚了大钱,连打工时认识的前辈都换了新手机,下半年的第一天她就把自己五年来打工攒下的三十万日元本金全部扔进了外汇市场,还加了二十五倍杠杆,信誓旦旦地说要把妈妈当年亏掉的两千万赚回来。结果碰上瑞士央行突然放弃汇率干预,瑞郎瞬间崩盘,她没设止损,直接爆仓强制平仓,倒欠平台一亿三千万。日元今年贬值了20%,身边同学纷纷取消了出国计划,而她连下周的房租都凑不齐,还偷了爸爸存折里最后三百万保证金想翻本,也一并打了水漂。今天走在东京的街上,突然所有人都停下手头的事蹲在路边抱头痛哭,因为世界杯日本队被其他队做局淘汰了。她说很难过,感觉掉进了人类的至暗时刻,就像八年前妈妈从楼顶跳下去之前看到的世界一样黑。她说她已经买好了绳子,这次是真的想去找妈妈团圆了。
❤3
为什么英国在布尔战争中打的如此艰难? | 原文
https://t.me/quickpaste/1740 梁叔叔用 300B 击落先进闭源大模型
🤣1
https://www.zhihu.com/question/451774491/answer/2066900080083334465 【你们觉得现在知乎存在最大的问题是什么? - 刘斯坦 的回答】 他那个项目分析的结论是知乎官方对关注多的答主限流。猜测的原因是如果不给大V限流的话致知计划太费钱? 为了省钱而给高质量回答限流,我相信知乎做得出来。
🌚3
一个瞎子和一个哑巴组成的好 homie
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @moonvoidclass. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 460,323 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“inside class” (@moonvoidclass), 1,265 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/moonvoidclass.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.