Срочно ищем Олега Владыко! По поводу вступления писать: @Aglaya_09 #длясоюзов

Channel
𝑴𝑶𝑶𝑵𝑺𝑯𝑨𝑫𝑶𝑾ˡⁱᶠᵉ
@moonshadolife
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
23subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004321543015 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @moonshadolife |
| Description | в этот тгк будут пересылаться все посты союзов инфо: @moonshadowfl |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 9 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/moonshadolife |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:33 | 23 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:51 | 23 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:16 | 22 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 9 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 70.2%
- avg views ÷ 23 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 16.1
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 8.33%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (9 August 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 323 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 11:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 19
- Links
- 6
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💘 | 1 | 50.0% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 50.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
— 《🌟。、— 𝒩𝐸ℰ𝖣𝓮𝒟 𝖱𖦹𝖫𝓮𝑆 𝅄 ┄.’ ༢. в средне/многострочную ролевую по мотивам сериалов «дневники вампира» и «первородные» срочно нужны активные ролевики на такие р𖦹ли как: ᰍ ࣪» ‘ 𝗏𝗂𝗇𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍 𝗀𝗋𝗂𝖿𝖿𝗂𝗍𝗁‘ ˖ 🌟໑۫ ᰍ ࣪» ‘ 𝖽𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗇 𝗌𝖺𝗅𝗏𝖺𝗍𝗈𝗋𝖾 ‘ ˖ 🌟໑۫ ᰍ ࣪» ‘ 𝖾𝗅𝗂𝗃𝖺𝗁 𝗆𝗂𝗄𝖺𝖾𝗅𝗌𝗈𝗇 ‘ ˖ 🌟໑۫ ᰍ ࣪» ‘ 𝗃𝗈𝗓𝗂𝖾 𝗌𝖺𝗅𝗍𝗓𝗆𝖺𝗇 ‘ ‘ ˖ 🌟໑۫ ᰍ ࣪» ‘ 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗇𝖺 𝗀𝗂𝗅𝖻𝖾𝗋𝗍 ‘ ˖ 🍒໑۫ ᰍ ࣪» ‘ 𝖻𝗈𝗇𝗇𝗂𝖾 𝖻𝖾𝗇𝗇𝖾𝗍 ’ ‘ ˖ 🥀໑۫ ᰍ ࣪» ‘ 𝗆𝖺𝗋𝖼𝖾𝗅 𝗀𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗋𝖽 ‘ ˖ 🧛໑۫ (списо́к р𖦹лей — жми
Срочно ищем!! Наша Беренис давно ждёт ,будет : любить, ценить, пылинки сдувать, кормить Найдись скорее тебя ждут ❤️ По поводу вступления писать: @Aglaya_09 #длясоюзов
Ребята мы срочно ищем Зейда для нашей прекрасной Аделин! Пожалуйста Зейд найдись Для вступления пишите: @Miria_Arlert #длясоюзов
Ребята мы срочно ищем Зейда для нашей прекрасной Аделин! Пожалуйста Зейд найдись Для вступления пишите: @Miria_Arlert #длясоюзов
𝚗𝚎𝚠 𝚞𝚗𝚒𝚘𝚗 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 Crownhollow
💘1
Ищем Белль Ардер и Даррелла Лагранжа из цикла,, Нежеланная Невеста,, По поводу вступления писать: @Aglaya_09 #длясоюзов
мне за него пообещали добить 100 пдп в инфо, найдись пж 😭
😁1
нам СРОЧНО нужен активный участник для брака с Нелли Радовой вступление @moonshadbot @tyriiiiil #UN
Ищем Игната Елецкого Писать в бот:@librarysanbath_bot #длясоюзов
💘💝👁️🗨️💖🤨 ☺️ы находимся в поисках следующих ролей: ☺️ужья для: кея, агаты, каи нери, дориана Серж Даня Матвеев Скэриэл Лоу Лавинию Браун (найдитесь пожалуйста, либо меня съедят.. ) ☺️ак же к нам можно вступить с любой ролью из дорамы, фильма и даже лакорна. ☺️исать: @tudicy #для_союзов
🤩сем здравствуйте! На связи романские. Хотела сообщить, что у нас снова была перезагрузка и мы сменили наше оформление назад на серо-белое🥹 🤩ы союзы пока не заключаем, так как у нас максимальное количество 🤩 так же мы ищем очень много нью в наш чат😇 🤩чень нуждаемся в таких ролях: — ЛУКА ВИТИЕЛЛО!!!!! — муж или жена для Маттео — Кейд Митчелл — Тобиас Митчелл — Шаннон Линч — Джонни Кавана — Патрик Фили — Эйден Кинг …
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @moonshadolife. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 114,829 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@Flod18 · 213 posts෫ ოᧉ𝒓𐐷ׅꪱ๋ꪱ๋𝘅𝆬 ᧉ𝕤ᧃֺྀི︩︪ 𐐼ִթᧉ 𝓊ṉࣲⅈ𝆈𖹭⃘ṉ ˖ 𖥻 ๋ᰍᰍ
@merviix_unions · 753 posts𝘼𝙢𝙤𝙧 𝙒𝙞𝙩𝙘𝙝 𝙞𝙣𝙛𝙤⋆౨ৎ˚⟡˖ ࣪
@amor_winfo · 1141 postB᧐᧐κ ɗrᥱᥲⲙ./info.
@BOOK_DREAM0 · 401 post𝐼𝑛𝑓𝑜 𝐴𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎 𝑁𝑜𝑣𝑎
@floodAstraNova · 901 post𝕁'𝕒𝕣𝕣𝕖̂𝕥𝕖𝕣𝕒𝕚 𝕕𝕖 𝕥'𝕒𝕚𝕞𝕖𝕣 𝕕𝕖𝕞𝕒𝕚𝕟 {𝕃𝕚𝕗𝕖}
@for_union_posts · 521 post𝓕𝓸𝔁-𝓟𝓱𝓸𝓮𝓷𝓲𝔁 𝓫𝓸𝓸𝓴 𝓲𝓷𝓯𝓸
@Fox_Flyd_01 · 931 post𝐼𝑛𝑓𝑜 𝑙𝑖𝑏𝑟𝑎𝑟𝑦 𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑏𝑎𝑡ℎ
@info_library_sabbath · 271 post𝙢𝙞𝙡𝙬𝙞𝙭 𝙞𝙣𝙛𝙤
@milwixinfoflood · 1141 post︵ 𝐌𝐎𝐎𝐍..𝐓𝐈𝐃𝐄 #𝓜𝐓 ◌Ⳋ || инфо
@moonTibeMTflood · 461 post✧𝑹𝒂𝒓𝒊𝒔𝒔𝒊𝒎𝒆 𝒊𝒏𝒇𝒐✧
@Rarissim · 1631 postㅤ#𝘙𝘖𝘔𝘈𝘕𝘚𝘒𝘐𝘌𐙚
@ROMAnsk1e · 1331 post𝖲𝖠𝖵𝖨𝖮𝖴𝖱𝖲 𝖮𝖥 𝖧𝖤𝖠𝖱𝖳𝖲 ˗ˏˋ
@savioursofhearts · 231 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@Flooding_all_books · 2223 posts𝐼𝑛𝑓𝑜 𝑙𝑖𝑏𝑟𝑎𝑟𝑦 𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑏𝑎𝑡ℎ
@info_library_sabbath · 273 posts✧𝑹𝒂𝒓𝒊𝒔𝒔𝒊𝒎𝒆 𝒊𝒏𝒇𝒐✧
@Rarissim · 1633 posts𝘼𝙢𝙤𝙧 𝙒𝙞𝙩𝙘𝙝 𝙞𝙣𝙛𝙤⋆౨ৎ˚⟡˖ ࣪
@amor_winfo · 1142 posts𝘽𝙤𝙤𝙠𝙛𝙞𝙧𝙚𝙛𝙡𝙮 𝙞𝙣𝙛𝙤
@Bookfireflyy · 3472 posts𝘨𝘭𝘰𝘰𝘮𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘨𝘩𝘵𝘴 #𝘨𝘵
@newsgloomythoughs · 1861 postㅤ#𝘙𝘖𝘔𝘈𝘕𝘚𝘒𝘐𝘌𐙚
@ROMAnsk1e · 1331 post𝖲𝖠𝖵𝖨𝖮𝖴𝖱𝖲 𝖮𝖥 𝖧𝖤𝖠𝖱𝖳𝖲 ˗ˏˋ
@savioursofhearts · 231 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@moonshadowfl · 1012 posts𝘼𝙢𝙤𝙧 𝙒𝙞𝙩𝙘𝙝 𝙞𝙣𝙛𝙤⋆౨ৎ˚⟡˖ ࣪
@amor_winfo · 1141 post:«ʙᴏᴏᴋᴍᴀɴ ғʟᴏᴏᴅ»: ||инфо
@Flod18 · 211 post𝐼𝑛𝑓𝑜 𝐴𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎 𝑁𝑜𝑣𝑎
@floodAstraNova · 901 post𝓕𝓸𝔁-𝓟𝓱𝓸𝓮𝓷𝓲𝔁 𝓫𝓸𝓸𝓴 𝓲𝓷𝓯𝓸
@Fox_Flyd_01 · 931 post𝒇𝒍𝒖𝒇𝒇𝒚𝗹𝗶𝗳𝗲
@lifefluffy · 451 post𝙢𝙞𝙡𝙬𝙞𝙭 𝙞𝙣𝙛𝙤
@milwixinfoflood · 1141 post𝑴𝑶𝑳𝑳𝑨𝑵𝑺 𝑭𝑳𝑶𝑶𝑫|𝑰𝑵𝑭𝑶
@mollansflood · 1081 post✧𝑹𝒂𝒓𝒊𝒔𝒔𝒊𝒎𝒆 𝒊𝒏𝒇𝒐✧
@Rarissim · 1631 post𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝖇𝖔𝖔𝖐 𝖒𝖆𝖟𝖊/𝕴𝖓𝖋𝖔
@thebookmazeinfo · 801 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝑴𝑶𝑶𝑵𝑺𝑯𝑨𝑫𝑶𝑾ˡⁱᶠᵉ” (@moonshadolife), 23 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/moonshadolife.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.