Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

мунси

@moonnsypic

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry

428subscribers

+10 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003954787240
TypeChannel
Username@moonnsypic
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 30 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/moonnsypic

Growth

4184284238 August 2026 — 418 subscribers8 August 2026 — 420 subscribers15 August 2026 — 428 subscribers8 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 417–430 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 10:23428+8
8 Aug 2026, 14:26420+2
8 Aug 2026, 08:31418first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
56.6%
avg views ÷ 428 subscribers
Avg views / post
242
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held13 (30 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total3,150
Reactions total376
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

376 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 601926068238444673613937.0%
custom 60168609080625128697620.2%
custom 60192806969320467325715.2%
custom 60193009691776841314211.2%
custom 6016893133202133919349.04%
custom 6019362275540866398287.45%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 376reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
38
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 13 we hold a reading for · 92%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @moonnsypic. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 19:15 UTC116 views22 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌑 STYLE: CAMERA_AND_ANGLE: Cowboy shot framing from the top of the head down to the mid-thighs. Slightly low angle, looking up at the figure. COLOR_AND_LIGHTING: Bright, crisp studio lighting originating from the upper left side. Sharp, distinct shadows fall across the right side of the figure's body and underneath the folds of the clothing. High contrast between the dark outerwear and light inner garme

custom 601689313320213391910custom 60192606823844467366custom 60168609080625128694custom 60193009691776841312

6 Aug 2026, 10:49 UTC194 views22 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑 STYLE: CAMERA_AND_ANGLE: Medium close-up, eye-level camera, slight upward tilt. COLOR_AND_LIGHTING: Bright, harsh direct sunlight from above and slightly to the side. High contrast, sharp specular highlights on wet skin and metallic surfaces. Reflected water caustics illuminating the shadows. Natural balanced color palette — neutral skin tones with healthy warmth, no color cast. BACKGROUND_AND_ENVIRO

custom 601926068238444673613custom 60168609080625128694custom 60193009691776841312custom 60193622755408663982custom 60192806969320467321

5 Aug 2026, 16:57 UTC230 views23 reactions4 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌑🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌑 STYLE: CAMERA_AND_ANGLE: Top-down flat lay perspective for the overall composition. Within the three polaroid frames: Extreme close-ups, eye-level camera. COLOR_AND_LIGHTING: Bright, sunlit outdoors. Harsh direct sunlight creating crisp, dark drop shadows beneath the polaroid frames and the cat, emphasizing the flat lay composition. Warm, vibrant green hues for the grass. Natural balanced color palette

custom 601926068238444673610custom 60168931332021339196custom 60192806969320467325custom 60168609080625128692

5 Aug 2026, 15:47 UTC198 views28 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌑🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑 STYLE: CAMERA_AND_ANGLE: Medium shot, eye-level camera, slight Dutch angle for dynamic composition. COLOR_AND_LIGHTING: Soft cinematic rim light from the side, simulating late afternoon sun. Warm golden-hour palette, gentle dappled shadows. Natural balanced color palette — neutral skin tones with healthy warmth, no color cast. BACKGROUND_AND_ENVIRONMENT: Tranquil traditional garden path. Soft bokeh

custom 601928069693204673212custom 60168609080625128698custom 60192606823844467367custom 60168931332021339191

4 Aug 2026, 17:57 UTC240 views37 reactions10 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌑 STYLE: CAMERA_AND_ANGLE: Full body shot. Low angle, slight Dutch angle to emphasize dynamic movement and tension. COLOR_AND_LIGHTING: Harsh cinematic rim light from behind, casting deep, sharp shadows forward. Monochromatic base palette with stark, saturated crimson accents in the effects. Natural balanced color palette — neutral skin tones with healthy warmth, no color cast. BACKGROUND_AND_ENVIRONMEN

custom 601926068238444673616custom 601686090806251286911custom 60193009691776841319custom 60168931332021339191

3 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC239 views43 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌑 у меня немношка промптовая импотенция🕊 STYLE: CAMERA_AND_ANGLE: Eye-level, close-up portrait shot. COLOR_AND_LIGHTING: Harsh direct lighting on the figure, deep contrasting shadows. Overall color palette: striking crimson and deep black with stark white highlights. High contrast. BACKGROUND_AND_ENVIRONMENT: Collage-style graphic backdrop. A distressed, textured dark red surface overlaid with large,

custom 601926068238444673620custom 601686090806251286910custom 601936227554086639810custom 60192806969320467323

2 Aug 2026, 13:17 UTC271 views33 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Добавила на сайтик 3 новых стиля, ваще они там валяются уже неделю ахахахха (кроме последнего) 1 и 3 из поста очень нравится юзать в таверне, все последние картинки из рп что выкладывала были с первым, даже с нб2 очень даже приятно смотрится!! 😊

custom 601926068238444673616custom 60168609080625128699custom 60168931332021339197custom 60192806969320467321

2 Aug 2026, 12:46 UTC267 views30 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌑🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌑 STYLE: CAMERA_AND_ANGLE: Extreme close-up, overhead top-down angle, flat lay perspective. COLOR_AND_LIGHTING: Soft diffused overhead light. Desaturated, earthy color palette with pale, ghostly highlights. Low contrast, muted shadows. Natural balanced color palette — neutral skin tones with healthy warmth, no color cast. BACKGROUND_AND_ENVIRONMENT: Dense bed of intertwined roots, dried vines, and pale d

custom 601926068238444673614custom 60168931332021339198custom 60168609080625128696custom 60193622755408663982

1 Aug 2026, 12:52 UTC294 views30 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌑 STYLE: CAMERA_AND_ANGLE: Low angle, medium-full shot for Figure 1, extreme close-up for Figure 2. Forced perspective. COLOR_AND_LIGHTING: Soft diffused overhead lighting, casting sharp shadows downward. Cool, desaturated color palette with stark contrasts. Natural balanced color palette — neutral skin tones with healthy warmth, no color cast. BACKGROUND_AND_ENVIRONMENT: Surreal void space. The gro

custom 601928069693204673214custom 60168609080625128698custom 60193622755408663985custom 60192606823844467362custom 60193009691776841311

31 Jul 2026, 19:07 UTC283 views27 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌑 STYLE: CAMERA_AND_ANGLE: High angle, medium shot, looking down at the water's surface. COLOR_AND_LIGHTING: Soft, diffused dappled lighting filtering through an unseen canopy. Shimmering water reflections bouncing light back onto the subjects. Natural balanced color palette — neutral skin tones with healthy warmth, no color cast. BACKGROUND_AND_ENVIRONMENT: A tranquil, shallow body of water covered in

custom 601926068238444673612custom 60192806969320467327custom 60168609080625128696custom 60193622755408663982

31 Jul 2026, 12:01 UTC303 views36 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑 🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑🌑 STYLE: CAMERA_AND_ANGLE: Medium shot, eye-level camera relative to the kneeling figure, capturing the dynamic theatrical composition. COLOR_AND_LIGHTING: Dramatic cinematic rim light mixed with soft diffused spotlighting. High contrast, rich theatrical palette with deep shadows and vibrant saturated highlights. Natural balanced color palette for the figures — neutral skin tones with healthy warmth,

custom 601926068238444673614custom 60193009691776841319custom 60168609080625128698custom 60192806969320467322custom 60193622755408663982custom 60168931332021339191

30 Jul 2026, 17:21 UTC304 views29 reactions3 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

моя работяжка трудится не покладая рук!!! чтобы мы могли смотреть на красоту в 2к!!🙏

custom 601930096917768413113custom 60192606823844467369custom 60192806969320467327

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @moonnsypic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 25,195 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“мунси” (@moonnsypic), 428 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/moonnsypic.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.