Channel
@moonlyapp
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
677subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001711017951 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @moonlyapp |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/moonlyapp |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:29 | 677 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:11 | 679 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:17 | 679 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 14 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
160 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 116 | 72.5% | |
| 🔥 | 17 | 10.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 16 | 10.0% | |
| custom 5262980730413134652 | 5 | 3.13% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 1.88% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 1.88% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 160reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 14 January 2026 to 17 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @moonlyapp. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 January 2026 to 17 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Предлагаем подписаться на новую страницу фаундера Moonly Ольги Раморы, где она рассказывает о личной практике, эзотерических инструментах и как с их помощью она выстраивает контакт с собой. Ольга говорит не об идеальной духовности и получении быстрых ответов, а делится живым процессом, в котором есть сомнения, поиск, рост и постепенное возвращение к себе. Если вам сейчас важно лучше понимать себя, чувствовать больш…
❤10
File, posted without a caption
❤8
Ezar Garuna — языковед, голосовой практик, исследователь сакральных языков, основатель проекта LinguaFUSION.online. Ezar создает голосовые практики, FUSION-карты и метаязыковые навигации. Помогает раскрыть живой голос души и настраивать внутреннее пространство через вибрацию и архетипические структуры. Мы давно сотрудничаем с этим мастером, именно его голос вы можете услышать в медитациях Moonly на испанском языке. Б…
❤8
Хватит быть заложником собственных реакций. Мы начинаем сегодня. ⏳🔥 Сколько раз вы обещали себе не злиться, не оправдываться или не замирать в сложные моменты, но в следующую секунду «автопилот» снова брал верх? Мы годами боремся с симптомами, пытаемся «взять себя в руки», но корень проблемы глубже — в подсознательных сценариях, которые управляют нами незаметно. Лада Хорошавина покажет вам, как на самом деле устрое…
❤1
Вы управляете своей жизнью или она управляет вами? 🔄 Замечали, как часто мы действуем на автопилоте? • Сказали что-то резкое в ответ на критику, а потом жалели. • Снова пошли по старому сценарию в отношениях, хотя обещали себе «больше никогда не наступать на те же грабли». • Чувствовали тревогу и замирали, вместо того чтобы принять решение. Это и есть уровень реакций. Когда наше состояние зависит от внешней среды, …
От реакций — к управлению: как стать автором своей жизни? ✨🧠 Часто нам кажется, что обстоятельства или люди диктуют нам, как себя чувствовать. Мы привыкаем «реагировать» автоматически: обижаться, защищаться или замирать. Но за пределами этих автоматизмов лежит навык, который определяет качество всей вашей жизни — Осознанное влияние. Это умение выбирать свою реакцию, управлять состоянием и выстраивать отношения не ч…
❤5
Какая тема откликается больше?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤5
Друзья, мы готовим для вас новый вебинар. На этот раз нашим проводником станет профессиональный психолог, и мы хотим, чтобы эта встреча ответила на ваш самый актуальный запрос. Какая из тем сейчас больше всего откликается в вашей жизни? Где вам больше всего не хватает ясности или инструментов? Голосуйте в опросе ниже или пишите свои мысли в комментариях Ваш голос определит программу эфира 💜
custom 52629807304131346525
File, posted without a caption
❤3
Рады представить новый выпуск подкаста на русском языке! Наталья Чиняева: Сепарация как освобождение энергии для отношений, денег и реализации 🩷 Наталья Чиняева — трансперсональный психолог, расстановщик и арт-терапевт, работает с глубинами бессознательного через символы, метафоры и образы. В этом выпуске мы обсуждаем: почему образ злой мачехи резонирует абсолютно со всеми, как в расставаниях мы попадаем в детскую…
❤8❤🔥4🔥2
🌙 Иногда кажется, что жизнь застряла в одной и той же фазе: вы читаете прогнозы, ждете правильного момента, но внутри есть ощущение, что пора что-то менять. Иногда для этого нужен не новый совет, а древний ключ. Наш друг, трансперсональный психолог и расстановщик Наталья Чиняева создала необычный инструмент трансформации — сказку «Три короны» о пробуждении архетипа Королевы. Это история о женщине, которая умеет гово…
❤7
Сегодня в 18:00 МСК мы встречаемся с Ольгой Prostosvoim, чтобы вернуть себе свою силу. Энергетическая работа требует тишины и особого настроя, поэтому мы рекомендуем начать подготовку заранее. Пусть эти простые действия станут первым шагом к вашей свободе. Чтобы практика прошла глубоко, безопасно и прошла максимально эффективно, важно заранее подготовить себя и свое пространство. Чтобы заранее подготовиться для глу…
❤6
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @moonlyapp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какая тема откликается больше?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 14 January 2026 to 17 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 970,568 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Moonly Souls” (@moonlyapp), 677 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/moonlyapp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.