Channel
@moonkittensjilix
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
834subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001531799819 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @moonkittensjilix |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/moonkittensjilix |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:35 | 834 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:21 | 833 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:35 | 833 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (5 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,040 |
| Reactions total | 745 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 01:21 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
745 reactions across 12 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5377492396839832681 | 319 | 42.8% | |
| custom 5219905399594956773 | 190 | 25.5% | |
| custom 5363805650327450240 | 169 | 22.7% | |
| custom 5283217795973134096 | 67 | 8.99% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 745reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
У них всё стабильно: Джисон очаровательный хаотик, а Феликс всегда находит повод потрогать его мышцы под шумок 🫂
custom 537749239683983268122custom 536380565032745024012custom 52199053995949567739
Феликс главный фанат песен Джисона, как всегда🥺
custom 537749239683983268130custom 521990539959495677313custom 53638056503274502409
Сейчас я радуюсь тому, что они просто рядышком сидят 🫣 Милашки 💚
custom 521990539959495677330custom 537749239683983268119custom 53638056503274502409custom 52832177959731340965
В this&that есть джиликсовый припев! Как же вкусно звучат 😍
custom 536380565032745024028custom 537749239683983268114custom 521990539959495677311custom 52832177959731340962
У меня есть hear me out и мысль, о которой думаю уже долгое время. У Гаона (Джисока) из героев очень джиликсовый вайб, он буквально ребёнок джиликсов!! 🐣 Я просто так чувствую, но есть и несколько милейших причин: Он такой же очаровательный нердик, как и Хан, который любит выдавать интересные факты о животных или динозаврах (например, смотреть тут или тут), плюс у него определённо есть silly вайб как у джили (самый …
custom 521990539959495677327custom 528321779597313409618custom 537749239683983268113custom 53638056503274502403
Ещё порция красоты, джиликсы такие джиликсы⭐💕
custom 537749239683983268134custom 528321779597313409621custom 521990539959495677312custom 53638056503274502404
Красивые очень 💜
custom 537749239683983268132custom 536380565032745024014custom 52199053995949567739custom 52832177959731340963
Моя честная реакция на все фотки Джисона:
custom 537749239683983268142custom 521990539959495677316custom 536380565032745024012custom 52832177959731340964
Это очень мощно, пустите мне эти две песни по венам 🔥😇
custom 536380565032745024036custom 537749239683983268114custom 521990539959495677310custom 52832177959731340966
Им очень идут нежные украшения с жемчугом🌟 Изящные аристократы 🤍
custom 537749239683983268131custom 521990539959495677317custom 536380565032745024012custom 52832177959731340961
Это уже вторая фотосессия в сотрудничестве с nars (и просто потрясающие мейки, которые так подчёркивают его красоту) 🌟 Возьмите нашего Хани в амбассадоры, это же сколько фантастической красоты мир увидит 🥺
custom 537749239683983268136custom 521990539959495677317custom 536380565032745024012custom 52832177959731340964
Самый красивый человек на свете.🤍
custom 537749239683983268132custom 521990539959495677319custom 536380565032745024018custom 52832177959731340963
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @moonkittensjilix. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 981,847 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“лунные котики джиликсы ¹⁴¹⁵ jilix” (@moonkittensjilix), 834 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/moonkittensjilix.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.