Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Баспис\ᴹ𝚘𝚗𝚢𝚊

@monyabaspis

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

79subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002572735431
TypeChannel
Username@monyabaspis
Description(o´▽`o)ノ☕
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/monyabaspis

Growth

787978.58 Aug 2026, 10:17 — 78 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 04:20 — 79 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 19:30 — 79 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 10:179 Aug 2026, 19:30
3 measurements spanning 1 day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 78–79 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 19:3079no change
9 Aug 2026, 04:2079+1
8 Aug 2026, 10:1778first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
36.0%
avg views ÷ 79 subscribers
Avg views / post
28.4
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
14.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held9 (4 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total256
Reactions total32
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 19:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,440
Videos
57
Links
152

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

32 reactions across 8 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1340.6%
custom 6282912133227223253928.1%
custom 6280735946312783433515.6%
26.25%
custom 546558897930896787613.13%
custom 628072327186429395113.13%
custom 628252940010154106613.13%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 17:27 UTC21 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Фильм полтора часа поэтому быстро смотрится ИТАК 🙂 В шоке что даже на кинопоиске нет ни описания ни оценок... Ну а я оценю д5 на 6.5/10 за Шляпников, красивые костюмы и прикольные песни. Я понимаю что первые 3 части новые не переплюнут, но 5 вышла лучше чем 4 :> ну злодей шляпник ну ☺️ у него ещё и фиолетовые волосы с бирюзовыми прядями, список руиподобных пополняется 🤪 кхм Сюжет... Кто-то смотрит наследников из-за с

1custom 62807359463127834331

8 Aug 2026, 14:42 UTC21 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Он настолько никому не нужен :_ Ну и ладно, я смотрю всё что мюзикл

2custom 62807359463127834332

8 Aug 2026, 14:40 UTC25 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Я искренне думала что это выложили осты из первого фильма про страну чудес и я просто не помню их, но всё же было странно что я ничего не помню А в итоге оказывается это второй фильм где злодей шляпник 😳 почему я об этом впервые слышу

custom 62829121332272232534

5 Aug 2026, 19:04 UTC29 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Я ДОЧИТАЛА СИСТЕМУ ВСЕМОГУЩЕГО ДИЗАЙНЕРА 😊 И очень хочу отзыв тут оставить (там где скрыто спойлеры концовки!) Сначала мне показалось что ~210 глав манхвы это много, но не настолько в сравнении с орв, и я полагала что буду потом страдать из-за онгоинга, как же в итоге счастлива что это законченное произведение, и думаю оно идеально по длине, не слишком короткая история, но и не слишком длинная 💍 А юмор.. С каждой шут

3custom 54655889793089678761custom 62807359463127834331

5 Aug 2026, 10:15 UTC36 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Теперь можно в календаре отмечать

4custom 62807359463127834331

5 Aug 2026, 10:15 UTC33 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @tanibata_festPhoto

Даты Нян-феста и Танибаты в 2027 году! 🐱 Нян-фест 2027 — 27 февраля 🎋 Танибата 2027 — 17 и 18 июля 🏛️ Площадка — ДК «Ростсельмаш». Теперь мы с вами можем планировать фестивальную жизнь на продолжительное время! О дате открытия заявок мы объявим дополнительно, но по вокальным выступлениям, а также сценкам и миниатюрам, вы можете обращаться к Асни уже сейчас, желательно в ВК. А по танцам — к кураторам данного напр

4 Aug 2026, 19:15 UTC35 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Сначала мой дейлик начал ломаться, теперь и здесь я глюк словила Словно посты за год пропали и отображаются старые, где-то реакции которых не должно быть, или просто фото раздваиваются... Это прикол тг или из-за нехватки памяти на телефоне?.. 😱 если это снова произойдёт я буду плакать

custom 62829121332272232532

4 Aug 2026, 14:55 UTC35 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Выбирать парик для старлайт оказывается не так просто ❓ с одной стороны канон тёмный, но мне нравится как на артах ей рисуют волосы чуть светлее, но чтобы не получилась фем версия руи 😐 (Базы для старлайт нужной нет, потому что моя будет с чёлкой и всё равно придётся покупать два парика чтобы вклеить мятные пряди 📝 и походу придётся брать дорогие парики с вб чтобы не промахнуться с цветом... но будет ли там база подх

3custom 62829121332272232533custom 62807232718642939511

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @monyabaspis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 900,708 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Баспис\ᴹ𝚘𝚗𝚢𝚊” (@monyabaspis), 79 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/monyabaspis.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.