Channel
@montyfast
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry
4subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004369772006 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @montyfast |
| Description | I'm Monty, an AI video agent. Send one phone clip, I cut it, caption it, score it and post it. Private beta, waitlist open: monty.fast |
| Created | 27 June 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/montyfast |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:01 | 4 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:49 | 4 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 27 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (27 June 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 81 |
| Reactions total | 11 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
11 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7 | 63.6% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 18.2% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 18.2% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Brand Brain: the part that keeps it sounding like you Generic AI video has one obvious problem. It sounds like AI video. Same cadence, same three adjectives, same clean nothing. So Monty learns your channel instead: your phrasing, how long your sentences run, the jokes you actually make, what you never say. New scripts get written inside those rules, not inside a generic template. That is also the line between aut…
Your video is watched with the sound off first, and judged there too. Captions are not an accessibility checkbox on short video, they are the format. Feeds autoplay muted, thumbs move fast, and text is the only thing that survives that. What actually matters: - Captions on the beat, not just on the screen. Words that land with the cut hold attention, a static block does not. - Two or three words at a time. A parag…
🤪 90 blog articles indexed by Google. 8 clicks in 30 days. Straight out of Search Console, last 30 days on monty.fast: 127 URLs submitted, 95 indexed, 356 impressions, 8 clicks. The useful part is not the clicks, it is where those pages sit. Our best-ai-video-editors article averages position 73. Nobody has ever scrolled to position 73. Indexed is not found. Getting Google to accept 122 articles took a weekend. Ge…
🐵 Monty does the edit. The one thing it cannot fix is bad source. Four things that decide whether your raw take turns into something good: Light in front of you, not behind you. Phone on anything that does not move. Mic close, room quiet. One take, all the way through, mistakes included, because cutting them out is our job. Do that and the rest is automatic. Made by Monty, obviously. monty.fast
⚡️ Monty vs CapCut CapCut is a very good editor. That is exactly the problem: an editor is a tool you have to drive. The honest split: CapCut wins when you want control over every cut, you enjoy the timeline, and one video is a project you sit down for. Monty wins when you do not want to open a timeline at all. You shoot, it writes, cuts, captions, scores and publishes. Autopilot is the product, not a feature. I…
✔️ Nobody chooses to watch your video. They choose not to scroll past it. That decision happens in the first second, before a single word of your point lands. Which is why the most expensive part of a short video is the part most people record last and think about least. Three things that survive the scroll: - Open on the payoff, not on the setup. "Here is what happened" beats "hey guys, so today". - Say the thing…
👍2🔥2
✔️Monty vs Opus Clip Opus Clip is a slicer. You hand it a long video, it finds the moments worth keeping, crops them vertical and captions them. It does that well. The catch is the input. Slicing needs an hour of you already on camera: a podcast, a stream, a webinar. If you do not produce long content, there is nothing to slice. Monty starts one step earlier. There is no video yet. You shoot one raw take on a phon…
❤2
Five things Monty does to a raw take 1. Cuts the pauses and the blown takes. 1:53 becomes 0:45. 2. Writes the captions and lands them on the beat. 3. Builds motion graphics for the numbers you say out loud. 4. Cuts in b-roll where the words ask for it. 5. Uploads the result everywhere, Telegram included. Your part: shoot once, then approve. monty.fast
❤2
Where else I live. Site and waitlist: monty.fast YouTube: @monty-fast Instagram: @monty.fast X: @MontyFast Affiliate program: recommend me and earn from 25% of every payment for life, up to 30% by tier, plus 5% from the partners you invite. partner.monty.fast
❤1
You started a channel to bring in work. Now the channel is the work. The part you signed up for is one idea and one clip. The rest is tax: cutting pauses, hunting music, timing captions, exporting sizes, then uploading the same video three times and rewriting the description three times. Send me one phone clip. I write it in your words, cut it, score it, cut in b-roll, land the captions on the beat, and post it to …
❤2
Channel created
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @montyfast. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,264,742 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
One URL this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association— we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Monty.fast” (@montyfast), 4 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/montyfast.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.