Channel
@montazht
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
796subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001243685360 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @montazht |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/montazht |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:46 | 796 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 795 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (3 August 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,202 |
| Reactions total | 99 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 02:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
99 reactions across 11 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 32 | 32.3% | |
| 🔥 | 24 | 24.2% | |
| 👍 | 16 | 16.2% | |
| custom 5431766464040283359 | 14 | 14.1% | |
| custom 5303438381743618017 | 6 | 6.06% | |
| custom 5197155404504642051 | 5 | 5.05% | |
| custom 5359536263856667601 | 1 | 1.01% | |
| custom 5429196643373169783 | 1 | 1.01% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 99reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Стало известно, что буквально ВСЕ вернутся к своим ролям в четвертой части «Мумии», которая выйдет спустя 20 лет после третьей части, а именно 25 октября 2027 года. Ждем!
❤3custom 53034383817436180171custom 54317664640402833591
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥3❤2custom 54317664640402833592custom 53034383817436180171
Не до конца понял, это реальная реклама или творческий проект. В конце конечно стоит логотип Lidl (немецкая сеть супермаркетов-дискаунтеров, работающая в большинстве стран Европы, а также в США). Но я не уверен, что это реклама, 1 минуту гуглил, ничего не нашел🤡. В любом случае это не важно. Тут меня сильно зацепил цвет, он какой-то красивый и одновременно "потный". Вроде как закос под пленку, а вроде зерна почти не…
🔥6👍2custom 54317664640402833592custom 54291966433731697831
Рубрика "картина недели", делаем?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤2👍2🔥2
Вчера писал небольшой пост про склейку в финальном побоище женихов в «Одиссее». Поискал картины на эту тему, захотелось поразглядывать. В целом есть картины на эту тему. Можно подчеркнуть композиционное решение, световое решение, позирование и многое другое. Раньше на канале была рубрика «Картина дня», но я быстро выдохся, каждый день искать картины. Вот думаю возродить рубрику, но не дня, а недели. Раз в неделю ис…
❤5🔥1custom 53034383817436180171
Во всю монтирую, вторую серию, нашего трипа по Сербии🇷🇸 Димаста, лучший танцор! Танцы на ТНТ из-за него закрыли! Боялись что придет!
👍6custom 54317664640402833595🔥3
Video message, posted without a caption
❤4custom 51971554045046420512custom 53034383817436180172
Ля, какой стилек (близкий мне)! Есть очень креативные ходы и сложные решения. Автор роликов xinc.vfx
❤5👍2🔥2custom 51971554045046420512custom 54317664640402833591
Осторожно, спойлер, хотя какой там! Кто не знает, что Одиссей всем женихам, пездюляторов раздаст? Вдруг вспомнил, что при просмотре «Одиссеи» Нолана в конце, в сцене побоища с женихами, заметил такую мини-склейку. Приятную (моему) глазу. Столом накрывают Одиссея, и тут же открывается дверь. По сути, склейка по фазе (разных объектов) или схожему движению, но в обратную сторону: стол сверху вниз, а дверь справа на лев…
🔥5❤3custom 54317664640402833593👍2
Начинаем рабочую неделю, коллеги! (У кого-то она, наверное, не заканчивалась)
❤2custom 51971554045046420511custom 53034383817436180171custom 53595362638566676011
УФ! СТИЛЬ! Художница Александра Родригес Варела-Грандаль, делает такие художественные переосмысления футболистов.
❤6👍2🔥2
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @montazht. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Рубрика "картина недели", делаем?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 109,322 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“МОНТАЖЪТ” (@montazht), 796 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/montazht.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.