Channel
@monsterreviews
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
75subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001491485377 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @monsterreviews |
| Created | 2 July 2021 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/monsterreviews |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:55 | 75 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:31 | 75 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 2 July 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 28 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
Happy New Year, Monster Reviewers! Wishing you a happy, healthy New Year!
🏦 Dear Monster Reviewers 🏦 Please Note: 💰 The minimum amount of payment will be 2$ from now on! ⚡ As you know, there are several tasks available right now, and you will be provided with more tasks soon! 🔥 Therefore, take and complete the tasks, and inform our colleague (@alexgooglemaps) after reaching 2$ to get paid. Thank you for understanding!
🤖 Dear Monster Reviewers, All of us are interested in having more and more tasks on our Bot! Therefore, we have started offering services to other platforms, such as Twitter. 🐦 We agree that Google Maps reviews are well-rewarded, but Twitter is better in terms of low rate of dropping/banning reviews and the speed of getting rewards. ⚡️ Please notice: Businesses interested in promoting their brands on Twitter requi…
New Twtitter task available at https://t.meMonsterReviewsBot
Dear All Notice: We can only pay for the reviews verified by Google! Please, before taking the task, read the simple rules and instructions available in the channel and bot! Please, consider the messages you receive regarding how to act before taking the task! You and us make a team, and we don't want to lose our efforts! Reviews have to be verified by Google.
We are All Here for Your Benefits! Dear all, Monster Reviews Bot hopes you have a great day! It's obvious that we are all here to earn some crypto. Therefore, I invite you guys to take the accessible task(s). Those guys who have not completed the task(s) yet, please take it and complete it. If you encounter any issue, don't hesitate to contact me! No worries if you understand English, but you cannot communicate…
💥 Finally The Great News Came Out! 💥 🤖 We are proud to announce that Our Dedicated Telegram Bot is launched! 🚀 Now you can see live review tasks, do them, invite your friends to get commissions (up to 3 tiers!) and earn money faster and easier than ever! 💸 💻📱 Just start the bot using the link below to experience an effortless new way of making money online! 🔥https://t.me/MonsterReviewsBot 📍 Current Live Task…
Dear all, Most of you aware of a tool we are building for all of you. A Telegram bot we make will 👍 have lots of tasks, 👍 you’ll be earning money, 👍 there will be 3-tier referral system 👍👍it’s FREE We announced we’ll make it by the end of July… Please accept our sincere apologies. You know how hard to find proper IT team that meets terms they announce. But we will finish the Bot really asap and announce it here. …
📍 Task 02.07.2021 Payment: 2$ Steps: 1) Contact @alexgooglemaps 2) Receive the link and review text 3) Write it, put 5 stars and Submit. 4) Get back to @alexgooglemaps with a screenshot.
👋 Greetings. We are a team of Online Marketing guys. Here we invite people who want to do some Quick & Easy money on making reviews on Google Maps. 💼 We provide various online marketing services including Google Maps reviews. And sometimes we need a spare pair of hands or sometimes even many of them. 🙋♂️ Since you are here, you know the rules and how it all works, but let's revise them: 1️⃣ You use the Google Ma…
Channel photo updated
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @monsterreviews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,399,530 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@monsterreviews named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Monster Reviews Bot (Earn LTC / DOGE / USDT / QIWI)” (@monsterreviews), 75 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/monsterreviews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.