4 measurements spanning 17 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 230–236 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Aug 2026, 10:06
232
-3
16 Aug 2026, 15:52
235
+4
8 Aug 2026, 10:05
231
no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:15
231
first reading
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 3 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
152 reactions across 9 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5298557903031005546
65
42.8%
custom 5381886680959562908
23
15.1%
custom 5219788039613594609
22
14.5%
custom 5215337255199066688
11
7.24%
custom 5199597604513522039
10
6.58%
custom 5381963389075470751
8
5.26%
custom 5314628888968588021
7
4.61%
custom 5382255691664734347
6
3.95%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 152reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 3 May 2026 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
32
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 9 we hold a reading for · 78%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @monologintroverta. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 May 2026 to 20 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
«Незнакомка из Уайлдфелл-холла» done 👍
Жалею, что откладывала этот роман несколько лет. И считаю, что вокруг него слишком мало хайпа!
Со школы мы слышим про Джейн Эйр и Грозовой перевал. А про «Незнакомку…» я узнала вообще случайно в буктоке пару лет назад.
Напомню сюжет: молодая женщина сбегает от мужа-тирана и алкоголика, чтобы защитить сына.
Дальше разбор без спойлеров 🙏🏼
Обычно, когда в классическом романе прис…
2 часа до конца чтения «Незнакомки из Уайлдфелл-холла»
Если верить киндлу конечно 😁
Всю прошлую неделю я страдала от боли после удаления двух зубов мудрости.
Зато! Пока мне было так больно, я читала фрагменты где муж нашей «Незнакомки…» наконец показывает себя во всей красе, и, возможно, я бы не смогла их прочитать будучи полностью здоровой. Вся энергия уходила на боль и чтение, сил на злость не было.
Мне очень н…
Треть «Незнакомки из Уайлдфелл-холла» прочитана
И мне ужас как нравится ❤️
Давно я не испытывала такого интереса! Не могу не сравнить Энн с ее сестрами Эмили и Шарлоттой, и пока Энн зацепила больше всех.
Сначала меня насторожило, что роман эпистолярный — у меня к этому жанру душа вообще не лежит, но, как я писала ранее, письма это скорее просто рамка, в которую вписана одна большая история, и читать ее очень легко…
Вы выбрали мне следующую книгу для чтения 🤩
С моей стороны, конечно, поступок сомнительной честности, ведь я предоставила вам выбор из четырех книг, которые я сама хотела прочитать 🐀
Ну и на этом моя честь не перестает подвергаться испытаниям — мы же выбирали мне книгу НА ОТПУСК? А в отпуске я не читала 🫠
Поездка выдалась насыщенной, времени вообще не было.
Но карма настигла меня, и я оказалась в обстоятельствах, …
The shares total 130%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
👿👿👿 Это пост-нагоняй самой себе.
Стала меньше читать. Сначала пыталась договориться с собой по-хорошему, я все-таки человек нетоксичный. Но некоторые! По-хорошему просто не понимают!
Заявляю, что я официально блокирую себе доступ к рилсам; а также ограничиваю доступ на фикбук!
И это еще не все. Мало того что мало читаю — так я еще и книгу себе нормально выбрать не могу. Сейчас мучаю «12 стульев», и мне НЕ НРАВИТСЯ…
Теория печали Милевы Эйнштейн
Негативные отзывы доведут меня до ручки 👎
Погнали! Чувством беспросветной тоски накрывает сразу: Милева получает письмо от почти-бывшего мужа Альберта Эйнштейна с условиями сохранения брака, унижающими ее достоинство.
Вообще всю книгу автор старается проникнуть Милеве под кожу и поделиться ее страданиями с нами. Получилось отлично, иногда во время чтения становилось прям невыносимо 🙂
…
Подглядела в тредсе прикольный промпт для gpt 🪴
Please turn the whole image into a crayon-style drawing. Simplify the details so it looks like something a 10-year-old would draw. Don’t use the original colors from the photo. Make it look like it’s drawn on white paper, with a very cute and playful feel. You can add adorable elements like flowers, candy, stars, clouds, etc., to make it look more childlike and innocen…
📢 Ласт ньюз
💅 Мною В КРЫСУ было прочитано три книги еще в феврале. Потом отпуск, работа, второй отпуск, жизнь бьет ключом все такое (нет)
В итоге последние два месяца я читала ТОЛЬКО фанфики 💻 И вот наконец-то! Я свалилась в дофаминовую фанфиковскую яму так глубоко, что мне удалось оттолкнуться от ее дна и вынырнуть! Проснулось дикое желание прочитать что-нибудь с ISBN. Жду поздравлений! Начала «12 стульев» 🙃
Про …
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @monologintroverta. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 130%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 3 May 2026 to 20 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Монолог интроверта | книги” (@monologintroverta), 232 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/monologintroverta.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
