Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ася

@monamourlit

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

481subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001915822001
TypeChannel
Username@monamourlit
Created1 December 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/monamourlit

Growth

481486483.56 August 2026 — 486 subscribers6 August 2026 — 486 subscribers7 August 2026 — 485 subscribers13 August 2026 — 481 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 480–487 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 03:24481-4
7 Aug 2026, 01:45485-1
6 Aug 2026, 18:48486no change
6 Aug 2026, 11:04486first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 14 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
102.4%
avg views ÷ 481 subscribers
Avg views / post
492
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
13
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held16 (14 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total6,401
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 18:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 13:11 UTC≈1,050 viewsread 6 August 2026

люди пишут про индивидуальность, хотя сами не знают значения этого слова, и думают, что смогут заработать уважение с помощью красивых фраз, которые ничего не значат. этот мир станет лучше, когда мы научимся вдохновляться, стараться, строить свой собственный путь и перестанем воровать чужое, выдавая за своё. когда люди перестанут думать, что их действия никто не заметит и можно выйти сухим из воды. чужой труд нужно ц

3 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC270 viewsread 6 August 2026

какие ваши самые любимые сериалы?

1 Aug 2026, 20:26 UTC315 viewsread 6 August 2026

сегодня случилось великое чудо и мы попали на одиссею нолана. я оставлю этот день где-то под сердцем

27 Jul 2026, 11:20 UTC404 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

это бюджетное комбо от catrice отлично сочетается между собой. создает приятный эффект загара и в то же время красивый румянец, где нет больших блесток, а лишь деликатное свечение это была отличная находка на лето

27 Jul 2026, 10:33 UTC346 viewsread 6 August 2026

это тяжело назвать укладкой, но было хорошим решением купить солевой спрей. можно сделать отличный объем, укладка держится намного дольше и волосы буквально как пластилин, можешь лепить всё что хочешь

26 Jul 2026, 19:21 UTC317 viewsread 6 August 2026

так интересно лицезреть то, как ты меняешься. смотреть старые посты и сравнивать с тем, как меняется твой стиль и понятие о красоте. какие мысли были изложены и вспоминать о своих прошлых интересах. как меняются твои предпочтения с возрастом и люди, которые когда-то были частью твоей жизни. возможно придет время и этих постов не будет, но пока что я оставлю их. хочу иногда обратно возвращаться в то время и вспоминат

16 Jul 2026, 14:10 UTC≈1,740 viewsread 6 August 2026

моя любовь не всегда громкая. иногда она стесняется показать свои истинные чувства и поэтому хранит внутри все эмоции и мысли, которые хотела бы поведать любимому человеку. иногда ей тяжело проявить себя в словах, но всегда будет совершать поступки подтверждающие значимость человека. ей тяжело прямо сказать «я тебя люблю», но она выскажет слишком много слов, которые как раз и будут описывать безграничную любовь. она

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @monamourlit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 321,724 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ася” (@monamourlit), 481 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/monamourlit.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.