3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 108–109 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 07:36
109
+1
9 Aug 2026, 08:01
108
no change
6 Aug 2026, 15:37
108
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 20 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
19s
Average length
19s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
52 reactions across 12 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
38
73.1%
❤
13
25.0%
🤗
1
1.92%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 52reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 January 2026 to 6 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Чунки эртанги куни шу ўсмирлар эр, ота ва қиз фарзанднинг отаси бўлади.
Агар биз бугун уларнинг онгига “аёлларга ишонма” деган ғояни сингдирсак, эртага улар ишончли оила қуришда қийналиши мумкин.
Менинг мақсадим вайнни тақиқлаш эмас.
Менинг мақсадим — контент яратаётган ҳар бир инсон бир саволни ўзига берсин:
“Мен одамларни фикрлашга ундаяпманми ёки уларнинг муносабатларини ҳам шакллантираяпманми?”
Чунки вайн би…
Келинг, бу вайнни муҳокама қилишдан олдин бир савол берайлик: нима учун бизнинг миямиз бу воқеада эркакнинг қарорини тез қабул қилади?
Бу ерда гап аёл ёки эркак ҳақида эмас. Гап инсон миясининг қандай ишлаши ҳақида.
Вайнда эркак ҳақиқатни текширмади. У тўлиқ маълумотга эга эмас. Лекин қарор чиқаради. Психологияда бу когнитив қисқа йўл деб аталади. Мия тез хулоса чиқаришни яхши кўради, чунки бу камроқ энергия талаб …
Энг оғир ҳақиқат
Манипулятор сени севмаслиги мумкин,
лекин сени йўқотишни истамайди.
Чунки сен —
унинг қулайлиги,
сабри,
кечирими.
Бу муҳаббат эмас.
Бу фойдаланиш.
#оғриқлиҳақиқат #руҳийозодлик
Назорат — муҳаббат эмас
“Мен сени севганим учун шундайман” дейди…
Қаерга бординг?
Ким билан гаплашдинг?
Нима учун жавоб бермадинг?
Севган инсон сени назорат қилмайди.
У сени хотиржам қилади.
Назорат — ишончсизлик белгиси.
#назорат #соғломмуносабат
Манипуляциянинг энг хавфли белгиси
Сен доим ўзингдан шубҳаланасан…
– “Мен ортиқча талаб қиляпманми?”
– “Нега доим мен тушунишим керак?”
– “Балким айб мендадир…”
Агар сен доим ўзингни айблаётган бўлсанг —
бу муҳаббат эмас.
Бу сени ичи-ичингдан синаётган манипуляция.
#айбдорликихисси #токсикмуносаб
Сиз яхши кўрган сиз билан узоқ йилдан берга бўлган инсонлар сизни манипуляция қилётган бўлиши мумкин! Чунки токсик муносабатларни сиз севганидан, сиздан хавотир олаётганидан деб ўйлаб келгандирсиз!!!
Бу китобни ўқишингиз билан кўзингиздаги “розавий очки” ечилади, тавсия қиламан! Бу китоб асосида фикрларим қизиқ бўлса инстаграмдаги профилимни кузатиб боринг!
Инстаграм профилимни биласизми? Оддийгина. Исм ва фамилиям😍
Signed Gulirano Erolova
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @monami_pc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 January 2026 to 6 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 446,891 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝙈𝙤𝙣𝙖𝙢𝙞 - 𝙥𝙨𝙞𝙭𝙤𝙡𝙤𝙜𝙞𝙮𝙖 𝙢𝙖𝙧𝙠𝙖𝙯𝙞” (@monami_pc), 109 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/monami_pc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
