اینکه زمان بهت ثابت کنه تمام حرفهای اون یه نفری که تا بیخ باهاش مخالف بودی، درست بوده.
❤22

Channel
@monalisaisbitab
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,385subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 6 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001250753681 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @monalisaisbitab |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/monalisaisbitab |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 13:57 | 2,385 | +1 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 13:16 | 2,384 | -2 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 11:41 | 2,386 | -3 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 07:22 | 2,389 | no change |
| 6 Sept 2026, 06:47 | 2,389 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (15 July 2026 – 4 September 2026) |
| Views total | 2,807 |
| Reactions total | 126 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Sept 2026, 07:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
873 reactions across 20 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 873 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 873 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 4 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
اینکه زمان بهت ثابت کنه تمام حرفهای اون یه نفری که تا بیخ باهاش مخالف بودی، درست بوده.
❤22
داستان از جایی شروع به تموم شدن میکنه که من دست از محافظت از تصوری که تو ازم داری، برمیدارم.
❤47
. خیلی از روزها اتفاقات، خبرها یا خاطرات، هر کدام مثل یک لکهی خاکستری روی هم سوار میشوند و یک لکهی سیاه بزرگ میسازند. این لکه جان میگیرد، مثل یک شبح دنبالم راه میافتد و قصد مغلوب کردن مرا میکند. من هیچوقت از او فرار نمیکنم چون حتی اگر تمام طول روز این کار را بکنم، شب که کلید در قفل میاندازم، میبینم آن شبح تمام خانه ام را فرا گرفته. به جای فرار، از اون فرصت میخواهم. فرصت اینکه کارهایم را انجام بدهم و بعد …
❤57
سوال عجیبی پرسیدی. بله فکر کردم ولی فقط و فقط یک نفر وجود داشت که میتونستم با وجود اون این قضیه رو تصور کنم. اونم چون تصورش شیرین بود. به طور کل از نظرم خیلی خطرناک و خیلی وحشتناکه. من شعور لازم رو ندارم براش.
❤19
#پیام_ناشناس به مادر شدن فکرکردی؟ @HarfBeManBot
❤3
همه جنگنده نیستن جانم، بعضیا رقصندهن. که خب اشکالی هم نداره.
❤21
#پیام_ناشناس بعد دو سال کات کردیم برای اون راحت بود انگار و برای من نه انتخاب کرد غمگین و شکست خورده باشه تا یه جنگنده که به آرزوش برسه تا سخت شد رفت. @HarfBeManBot
❤3
روزهام تغییر کردن چون من یه تغییراتی کردم. دوتاش خیلی مهمه. اولی اینکه اعتیادم به پارتنر و حضورش رو ترک کردم. درمورد شخص صحبت نمیکنما، درمورد کانسپت پارتنر صحبت میکنم. از دوست داشتن و عشق فراریام، قبلا هم گفتم. و دومیش اینکه با شبهایی که تنها میگذرونم، یعنی تمام شبها، ارتباط گرفتم. اینا جزو چیزایی بودن که به هم مربوط میشدن. درسته قسمتهای لذت بخش هم زیاد داشت اما در مجموع، اعتیادم به پارتنر و ناتوان بودنم در ت…
❤39
#پیام_ناشناس خب مگه نمیگی خبر زیاده؟ بگو روزات رو چجوری میگذرونی @HarfBeManBot
❤4
مامانم صبح پا شده خبر آتیشسوزی مغازههای گرگان رو خونده، بدون اینکه لود بشه و بیدار بشه زنگ زده به من میگه تو که مغازهت اونجا نیست؟:))) گفتم نه خیالت راحت من کلا مغازه ندارم:)))
❤44
چه دشمن بیوقاری هستی.
❤52
حالا، باید بخوابم. روز سختی داشتهام. روز صحبت های سخت، کارهای سخت و فکرهای سخت. در بارش شهابی تنها دو شهاب نصیبم شد و مقدار زیادی حرف بیهوده و یک مسیر طولانی با موزیک های چرند. زندگی گاهی اینطور است. بگذار بیشتر از این در خودم فرو بروم. چیزهایی هست که مایلم از این عمق بیرون بکشم و استفاده کنم.
❤51
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @monalisaisbitab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مونالیزا بیتاب است.” (@monalisaisbitab), 2,385 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/monalisaisbitab.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.