Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Momoco ݁ ˖Ი𐑼⋆

Channel

Momoco ݁ ˖Ი𐑼⋆

@momocou

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

130subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 5 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004486849001
TypeChannel
Username@momocou
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 22 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded5 September 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/momocou

Growth

123130126.55 September 2026 — 123 subscribers5 September 2026 — 123 subscribers8 September 2026 — 125 subscribers15 September 2026 — 130 subscribers5 September 202615 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 10 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 122–131 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 22:00130+5
8 Sept 2026, 08:18125+2
5 Sept 2026, 15:23123no change
5 Sept 2026, 14:47123first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 22 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
112.1%
avg views ÷ 130 subscribers
Avg views / post
146
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
15.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 September 2026
Posts held19 (22 August 20265 September 2026)
Views total2,770
Reactions total439
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Sept 2026, 15:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 12s
Average length
1m 12s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

439 reactions across 19 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥11726.7%
8820.0%
💔4510.3%
🍓419.34%
👍286.38%
💘245.47%
😍214.78%
😭143.19%
❤‍🔥132.96%
👌122.73%
🙏92.05%
😢81.82%
🤩61.37%
💋51.14%
🤔40.911%
🤯20.456%
🎉10.228%
😱10.228%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 439 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 22 August 2026 to 5 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Sept 2026, 13:59 UTC19 views9 reactionsread 5 September 2026

میدونید که با ریکت خوشحال میشم😔🩷

7💋2

5 Sept 2026, 13:36 UTC22 views13 reactionsread 5 September 2026
Photo

امروز یکم همینطوری برای تمرین اسکیس زدم⚡ پروسه ی تمرین کردن از نقاشی های خودم بیشتر برام لذت بخشه🚶 (رفرنس هامو تو کامنتا میزارم)

🍓8😍3💋1💘1

3 Sept 2026, 19:16 UTC51 views26 reactionsread 5 September 2026
Photo

چون که قبلیه بک گراند نداشت و یه جوری بودم‌ و پس رهاش کردم:⁠-⁠)⁩ الان دارم با این پیش میرم و حس بهتری بهش دارم اونم البته فعلن😅

🍓16🔥42❤‍🔥1👌1👍1💘1

3 Sept 2026, 19:16 UTC51 views11 reactionsread 5 September 2026

بچه ها یه چیزی🥲 من اسکیسم از ناتسویا رو تغییر دادم👀

6💘2😭2😱1

1 Sept 2026, 11:55 UTC135 views37 reactionsread 5 September 2026
Photo

اتود کار جدید⁦:⁠-⁠)⁩ اگه گفتین OC جذابِ کیه؟😁🐈

🔥236😍3😭2❤‍🔥1🍓1💘1

30 Aug 2026, 12:34 UTC121 views26 reactionsread 5 September 2026
Photo

الان دیگه فقط گذاشتمشون دکور و اگه به مدل سه بعدی نیاز داشته باشم از مدل های کلیپ استدیو پینت استفاده میکنم:⁠-⁠)

14👍6👌3🤩2🔥1

30 Aug 2026, 12:33 UTC114 views20 reactionsread 5 September 2026
Photo

این تجربه رو گفتم بهتون که پولاتونو سر این به باد ندین و اگه واقعا میخواین این محصول رو بخرین حتما اصلش رو بگیرین،اول اینکه بدونین قیمت یکیش حدود ۳۶ دلاره،پس جایی ارزون دیدین شک کنین و دومین راه برای تشخیصش اینه که به شونه هاشون دقت کنین،باید به این شکل باشن میتونین مقایسه کنین😆

🙏94👌3😭2🍓1🤔1

30 Aug 2026, 12:33 UTC96 views22 reactionsread 5 September 2026
Photo

دومین نکته ای که فهمیدم اینکه شونه هاش چرا اینطوریه،گردنش چرا کجه و...🫪 تا اینکه متوجه شدم بله..من جنس فیک خریدم😃 میدونستم البته فیکه،ولی حداقل فکر میکردم های کپی باشه!

💔15😢4😭3

30 Aug 2026, 12:32 UTC82 views23 reactionsread 5 September 2026
Photo

اولین چیزی که زد تو ذوقم این بود که بدون اینکه فشاری بیارم دستش شکست و دیگه تبدیل به یه فیگور تک دستی شد⁦:⁠,⁠-⁠)⁩ پس متوجه شدم خیلی شکننده تر از این حرفان😭 الانم فقط بزور میتونم بزارمش تو،اما دست بزنم میوفته دستش

💔19😭3😢1

30 Aug 2026, 12:32 UTC94 views21 reactionsread 5 September 2026
Photo

این قسمت:پولمونو آشغال نریزیم‌:⁠-⁠)⁩ تقریبا ۵ سال پیش بود که اینارو با کلی ذوق از چین سفارش داده بودم و برای هر کدوم به پول خودمون ۷۵۰ تومن داده بودم بعد اینکه به دستم رسید و بازش کردم هنوز گرم بودم و متوجه یه سری حقایق نشده بودم⁦:⁠-⁠)⁩

💔11🤔3😢3💘2😭2

29 Aug 2026, 13:33 UTC98 views23 reactionsread 5 September 2026
Video

تایم لپس کارم✨

🔥13😍42❤‍🔥1🍓1👌1👍1

29 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTC90 views13 reactionsread 5 September 2026

همگی مرسی از حمایت هاتون و انرژی ای که دادین^^🩷

🍓5❤‍🔥3🔥21💘1😍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @momocou. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Momoco ݁ ˖Ი𐑼⋆” (@momocou), 130 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/momocou.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.