Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Молочный путь | Консультант по ГВ в Стамбуле

Channel

Молочный путь | Консультант по ГВ в Стамбуле

@mommy_lactaa

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

699subscribers

-8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001937108768
TypeChannel
Username@mommy_lactaa
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mommy_lactaa

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

694707700.57 August 2026 — 707 subscribers8 August 2026 — 707 subscribers15 August 2026 — 704 subscribers24 August 2026 — 699 subscribers30 August 2026 — 705 subscribers8 September 2026 — 694 subscribers15 September 2026 — 699 subscribers6997 August 202615 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 39 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 692–709 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 11:39699+5
8 Sept 2026, 09:19694-11
30 Aug 2026, 14:43705+6
24 Aug 2026, 04:44699-5
15 Aug 2026, 15:37704-3
8 Aug 2026, 02:18707no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:44707first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

125 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5846.4%
👍2620.8%
custom 51882303808591852611512.0%
🍓129.60%
❤‍🔥108.00%
🔥43.20%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 125 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 May 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mommy_lactaa. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 May 2026 to 24 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

24 Jul 2026, 10:13 UTC181 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Уа алейкум ассалям уа рахматуЛлахи уа баракатуху. В целом, это состояние безобидно для ГВ. Но я бы обратила внимание ещё на то, в какой момент возникают неприятные ощущения и как долго это длится. Вполне возможно, что неприятные ощущения связаны с т.н. «приливами» — рефлексом отдачи молока, их отмечают многие кормящие мамы, в том числе и не имеющие ФКМ в анамнезе. Постарайтесь вспомнить, замечали ли эти ощущения д

👍31custom 51882303808591852611

24 Jul 2026, 10:13 UTC182 viewsread 8 August 2026

السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته Сестра я бы хотела узнать , ФКМ груди может ли влиять на гв? Именно могут ли быть неприятные ощущения при кормлении из за мастопатии

15 Jun 2026, 11:50 UTC450 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Тот самый момент, когда ты на своём месте и результат работы приносит глубокое удовлетворение. «…моё грудное вскармливание прошло просто отлично.» «…два года и два месяца я кормила и наслаждалась каждым моментом.» Счастье! 💗

9🍓5custom 51882303808591852614

5 Jun 2026, 17:33 UTC477 views17 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Красивое число 700 на канале, Аллахумма барик 💖 Добро пожаловать, я очень рада всем вам! Перейдя по ссылкам ниже, можно подробнее узнать: Какие услуги я предоставляю и расценки на них Немного обо мне И в каких случаях я могу быть полезна вам Оставайтесь, на канале уже есть и периодически выходят интересные посты. Признаюсь честно, я не веду канал так активно, как хотелось бы, так как большую часть времени зани

11❤‍🔥3👍3

18 May 2026, 14:20 UTC570 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Подошло к концу еще одно сопровождение онлайн. Запросом мамы было уйти от докорма смесью к исключительно грудному вскармливанию. Планомерно снижая дозировку докорма, раз в трое суток, мы отслеживали прибавку в весе малыша, оценивая её в совокупности с самочувствием и наполняемостью подгузника. Шаг за шагом, мы плавно снижали суточную дозировку докорма, а организм мамы подстраивался к возрастающим нуждам малыша в мо

12custom 51882303808591852614🍓2

18 May 2026, 10:22 UTC343 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @blocknot_pediatra

«ГАЛЯ, У НАС ОТМЕНА!» © "Нет" коликам или о новом пересмотре *Римских критериев. Каждый раз, когда я на консультации или вебинаре затрагивала тему младенческих колик, мне было стрёмно называть их коликами: термин "колика" дословно означает "боль в толстой кишке". Как будто у ребенка болит живот и надо искать причину, устранять ее. Хотя на самом деле это не так. На деле это нарушение равновесия между ресурсами малы

5🔥2👍1

14 May 2026, 21:23 UTC310 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Мне, как стороннему специалисту, который вел новорожденную маму совместно с сестрой Кариной и невольно наблюдал за ее ответами, оооочень понравилось отношение сестры и ее консультации😍 Очень подробные, на понятном простом языке, с бережным подходом, максимально доступно, с использованием фото/видео для простоты восприятия😍👍 Очень рекомендую! Аллахумма барик 🤲🏻🌷 Побольше бы таких отзывчивых специалистов!💞

2

14 May 2026, 21:23 UTC322 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Сестра Амина — врач-педиатр, к которой я с большим доверием ношу свои тревоги и вопросы, касающиеся здоровья ребёнка! Потому что уверена в её профессионализме и качестве оказания помощи. Обращаясь к ней, я знаю, что на консультации получу действительно эффективные рекомендации. Хочу поделиться с вами её сообщением и сказать, что для меня особенно ценно получить такой отклик именно от неё! Доверие и поддержка коллег

4❤‍🔥3🍓3

13 May 2026, 23:09 UTC452 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ура!!! Колики отменили официально!!! То, о чем мы рассказываем много лет, теперь есть и в официальных документах! В мае 2026 г вышел 5-й пересмотр Римских критериев (международные согласительные диагностические критерии для функциональных заболеваний желудочно‑кишечного тракта (ЖКТ), разработанные экспертной группой) и теперь официально нет диагноза "младенческие колики" Теперь это называется Синдром младенческог

👍162🔥2

9 May 2026, 09:26 UTC350 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Помню, что обещала вам рассказать о новой услуге — патронаже по налаживанию грудного вскармливания и уходу за малышом. Размышляю, в каком виде это будет лучше всего организовать. А ещё в планах — написать пост о чепчиках для новорождённых, шапочках и иже с ними. В заметках также пост о корректном использовании молокоотсоса.

❤‍🔥3custom 518823038085918526132🍓1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mommy_lactaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Валентина Жукова
@nutriciologzhu · 38,466
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 31 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Молочный путь | Консультант по ГВ в Стамбуле” (@mommy_lactaa), 699 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mommy_lactaa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.