Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝕸𝖔𝖒𝖒𝖞 𝕳𝖊𝖑𝖑𝖘𝖚𝖓𝖓𝖞🎞

Channel

𝕸𝖔𝖒𝖒𝖞 𝕳𝖊𝖑𝖑𝖘𝖚𝖓𝖓𝖞🎞

@mommyHellsunny

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

95subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002545945597
TypeChannel
Username@mommyHellsunny
DescriptionПриветствую на канале Хеллсанни🤗 Админ - милая, чудаковатая девушка, плод реинкарнации Высоцкого, фанат Конан Дойла и Балабанова. Обожаю Михаила Боярского
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 October 2026
Last confirmed live10 October 2026
Measurements held8
On Telegramt.me/mommyHellsunny

Growth

869590.58 August 2026 — 91 subscribers16 August 2026 — 88 subscribers24 August 2026 — 87 subscribers1 September 2026 — 86 subscribers11 September 2026 — 88 subscribers27 September 2026 — 93 subscribers8 October 2026 — 95 subscribers10 October 2026 — 95 subscribers8 August 202610 October 2026
8 measurements spanning 63 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 85–96 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Oct 2026, 12:2395no change
8 Oct 2026, 22:1595+2
27 Sept 2026, 19:5693+5
11 Sept 2026, 00:2088+2
1 Sept 2026, 09:1386-1
24 Aug 2026, 11:3387-1
16 Aug 2026, 07:3888-3
8 Aug 2026, 04:1591first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 27 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
61.5%
avg views ÷ 95 subscribers
Avg views / post
58.4
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 October 2026
Posts held15 (27 September 2026 – 9 October 2026)
Views total876
Reactions total119
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Oct 2026, 12:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
417
Videos
67
Links
28

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

119 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤9176.5%
❤‍🔥1916.0%
🔥32.52%
custom 520886454191550354221.68%
🤩21.68%
💋10.84%
💔10.84%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 119 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 27 September 2026 to 9 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Oct 2026, 14:10 UTC32 views5 reactionsread 10 October 2026
Photo

🤩«Я не люблю, когда мне лезут в душу, тем более — когда в неё плюют...» Эти строки написал человек, который ушёл от нас более 40 лет назад. Но почему-то кажется, что они написаны вчера. Или сегодня утром. Или про нас с вами прямо сейчас. Высоцкий умел говорить то, что мы боимся произнести вслух. Он пел о надломе, о свободе, о любви и о том, как сложно оставаться собой в мире, который требует быть «как все». Если в…

❤4❤‍🔥1

9 Oct 2026, 04:00 UTC39 views12 reactionsread 10 October 2026
Photo

Эта дурочка вспомнила, что шарит за мушкетеров и решила сделать контент по ним У меня времена Фронды ассоциируются с песней ГрОб, "все идет по плану", и этот скетч как раз вдохновлён этой песней Уже взрослый д'Артаньян спрашивает неизвестно у кого - "все ещё идёт по плану?" И все с нетерпением ждут короля-солнце, уверенные, что при нём все будет прекрасно Реакции/репосты?🥺

❤‍🔥10❤2

7 Oct 2026, 04:23 UTC49 views9 reactionsread 10 October 2026
Video

Всем, кто не ставит реакции, Макарыч летит давать по жопе (Это тонкий намек ☝)

❤9

6 Oct 2026, 15:47 UTC54 views5 reactionsread 10 October 2026

2.1 часть! Все не влезло, это только половина второй части... Оценки и реакции, пожалуйста!) Чем больше будет, тем быстрее напишу продолжение🥺

❤5

6 Oct 2026, 15:46 UTC51 views3 reactionsread 10 October 2026

— Ты точно первый раз играешь? Больно уж складно. Как будто всю жизнь в «дурака» дулась, — шутливо-подозрительно спросил Кузнечик. — Точно, — кивнула Яна. Кузнечик открыл рот, хотел было ещё что-то сказать, но не успел. Из-за угла казармы показался Титаренко. Лицо у него было такое, что было понятно — сейчас будет ох как плохо. — Кузнечик! — рявкнул Маэстро ещё издали. — Почему не на построении?! А вы, — он обвёл …

❤3

6 Oct 2026, 15:46 UTC37 views4 reactionsread 10 October 2026

— А ты чего дрыхнешь?! — огрызнулся Титаренко, отпуская Яну. — Твоя девчонка по всему аэродрому шастает! Желторотики её чуть не накормили, не напоили, спать не уложили! Я ей говорю, чтобы домой шла! А она дерётся! — Так тебе и надо! — в ответ огрызнулась Яна, скорчив Титаренко рожу. Только пустые глаза весь эффект сбили. — Ну вот! Видишь! — возмутился Титаренко, махнув рукой в сторону Яны. — Вижу, — кивнул Макарыч…

❤4

6 Oct 2026, 15:46 UTC42 views4 reactionsread 10 October 2026

Холодный рассвет медленно догорал, розовые краски исчезали с неба. Бледное солнце поднималось на небосвод. На часах было шесть утра. Половина второй роты ещё спала, но жизнь уже потихоньку начинала кипеть. Серые глаза Яны стали голубыми и засветились мягким светом. Это был признак того, что она зарядилась на полную и была готова на новые дела. Яна села на кровати, тряхнула кудряшками и вскочила на ноги. Проводок натя…

❤4

6 Oct 2026, 10:56 UTC57 views16 reactionsread 10 October 2026
Photo

Советы от Макарыча Аргументы, почему робо-ребенок лучше, чем обычный. Минусов нет! Одни плюсы! Особенно пятый пункт (Это намёк, что сегодня вечером выложу следующую часть😚) Жду побольше реакций и тогда выложу следующую часть пораньше🥺

❤10❤‍🔥3🔥2💋1

5 Oct 2026, 08:10 UTC59 views14 reactionsread 10 October 2026
Photo

Немного не по теме, но я ОЧЕНЬ ХОЧУ ПОХВАСТАТЬСЯ!)) МНЕ ЭТО ДАЛИ ЗА ХОРОШИЙ МОНТАЖ! Я ВЫИГРАЛА В КОНКУРСЕ!))) КТО ТАМ ГОВОРИЛ, ЧТО Я МОНТИРОВАТЬ НЕ УМЕЮ?) А?) Я в таком восторге просто....)

❤9❤‍🔥2custom 52088645419155035422🤩1

4 Oct 2026, 09:27 UTC63 views7 reactionsread 10 October 2026

Как всем известно, у Хеллсанни идей много, а мозгов мало. И в очередной раз в моем мозгу размером с грецкий орех, появилась безумная идея... ГО Я СДЕЛАЮ КОСПЛЕЙ НА Fem!Макарыча?)) Я думаю, мне пойдет! У меня как раз есть все необходимое (только пилотки не хватает🤨 но я это исправлю)

❤7

3 Oct 2026, 12:33 UTC74 views11 reactionsread 10 October 2026
Photo

Вы не знали, но на самом деле Хеллсанни - дух кладбища🥺 Не так давно узнала, что Алексей Смирнов похоронен у нас и конечно же - надо было съездить! Ко мне какая-то тётя, правда, пристала, мол, ты знаешь вообще кто это такой, ты просто поглазеть пришла. А потом такая - я не скандалю! Посоветовала мне какой-то фильм с ним посмотреть и ещё такая "не сиди на могиле! Все тепло вытянет! Ещё детей рожать!" Короче, поездка …

❤6❤‍🔥3🔥1🤩1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @mommyHellsunny. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝕸𝖔𝖒𝖒𝖞 𝕳𝖊𝖑𝖑𝖘𝖚𝖓𝖓𝖞🎞” (@mommyHellsunny), 95 subscribers as measured 10 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mommyHellsunny.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.