Channel
@momminiEV
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
328subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003004754222 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @momminiEV |
| Description | ~здесь находятся моменты, которые не хочется забывать🤍 •материнство|лайф|распаковки|уют |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/momminiEV |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:18 | 328 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:03 | 328 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (27 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,618 |
| Reactions total | 1,432 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 07:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,432 reactions across 11 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 249 | 17.4% | |
| 😍 | 241 | 16.8% | |
| ❤ | 240 | 16.8% | |
| 💘 | 145 | 10.1% | |
| custom 5397915559037785261 | 136 | 9.50% | |
| 🥰 | 109 | 7.61% | |
| custom 5465467040892476722 | 65 | 4.54% | |
| ❤🔥 | 63 | 4.40% | |
| 🍓 | 54 | 3.77% | |
| 💔 | 37 | 2.58% | |
| custom 5465511459444235288 | 34 | 2.37% | |
| 💋 | 29 | 2.03% | |
| 🐳 | 22 | 1.54% | |
| custom 5282816560128336499 | 4 | 0.279% | |
| custom 5436040291507247633 | 3 | 0.209% | |
| custom 5472178859300363509 | 1 | 0.07% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,432reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Для нее каждая перекладина или то, что находится над землей, это турник😄 Спортсменами не становятся, ими рождаются🤍
😍35🍓29❤🔥25❤8custom 54654670408924767228🔥7custom 53979155590377852616
💅💛
😍49💘40❤🔥38❤12custom 539791555903778526111🔥9🥰9
😢
🥰50custom 539791555903778526134💔30🍓17custom 54654670408924767229❤8🔥7custom 54655114594442352882
Еще в нашей библиотеке +3 новые книжки, одна из них ароматная (действительно пахнет тем, что нарисовано на картинке, Васин фаворит это попкорн)📚 Еще взяла эту (у нас есть такая от другого производителя, и, честно? Другая мне нравится больше), ну и эту, не тосковать же первой части одной😏
❤50🔥39custom 546551145944423528832🥰11😍11💋10custom 546546704089247672210
Такие они милые и уютные🤍
🔥47💘37😍36❤12custom 53979155590377852619custom 54654670408924767229
🥹💔
😍46❤40💘39🔥9🍓8custom 54654670408924767228💔7
Сравнивали ли вашего ребенка со своим? Как вы к такому относитесь?🤍
🔥51🥰39custom 539791555903778526136❤9💋7custom 54654670408924767227🐳4
Я ее и не приучаю Было такое, что я показала на примере куклы, что нужно с ним делать, это было в момент, когда горшок только-только появился в ее поле зрения Сейчас я не настаиваю и не сажу на него «насильно», она сама идет к нему и делает с ним, что хочет Вася сама решила сходить именно в горшок, пусть это было всего несколько раз, это показало то, что она начинает понимать, для чего он действительно стоит в комн…
❤27🔥21💋12😍1
Горшок у нас был просто стулом😂 И вот уже около 2-3 недель Василиса активно проявляет к нему интерес Без уговоров, без высаживаний и без принуждения ДАЖЕ, несколько раз сходила в него самостоятельно Что я для этого сделала? Ни-че-го😂 Просто всегда ставила его на видное место и именно в самую жару, когда подгузники отошли на второй план и она весь день могла проводить время на улице и в бассейне, ей стало интересно Н…
😍42💘29custom 539791555903778526129❤16🔥14custom 546546704089247672211
Такая маленькая радостная новость🥳 Очень надеюсь, что мои опасения ложные, так как считаю, что это очень крутое предложение🤍 Журнал, кстати, называется «Волшебные дети»🌸 Что бы вы сделали на моем месте? И как бы отнеслись к такому предложению?🐰
❤35🔥31😍21custom 52828165601283364994custom 53979155590377852614custom 54360402915072476333custom 54654670408924767223
🤍
❤23🐳18🔥14custom 53979155590377852617custom 54721788593003635091
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @momminiEV. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 955,316 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“|между моментами✨” (@momminiEV), 328 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/momminiEV.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.